sunset 2023-07-20

Why is this journal so slow? The time displayed on the official website doesn't match at all.

tobytong 2023-07-11

Already rejected, the reasons being lack of innovation and contribution compared to this journal.

yuuwt 2023-06-14

It has been about two weeks.

tobytong 2023-06-13

I am also an editor appointed now, how long have you been stuck?

yuuwt 2023-06-11

My editor appointment has been for a long time, and then the view submission details are the same as yours.

tobytong 2023-06-10

No, it is peer review.

yuuwt 2023-06-08

Is your display outside the editor appointed?

yuuwt 2023-06-08

Why does the interface outside show "editor appointed" for a long time?

tobytong 2023-06-05

2023.6.1 Submission received
2023.6.2 Initial technical check
2023.6.2 Peer review

eleanorTT 2023-03-29

2022.08.28: submit (S.I.)
2022.12.28: with editor
2023.01.17: major revise
2023.2.18: submit revision
2023.2.20: with editor
2023.2.23: under review
2023.3.38: accept
Both reviewers provided professional opinions, with one suggesting improvements in language and writing style, and the other questioning the inclusion of model inference indicators and the need for a summary of the innovative work. The reason for choosing this journal was the short review cycle mentioned on the official website, but the actual speed was frustrating, taking nearly 6 months to receive the first review. After that, the paper was revised and supplemented according to the suggestions, which took another month. Fortunately, it was eventually accepted. Ignoring the time factor, this submission experience was still good.

Skye风 2023-03-21

3.16 has been accepted.

好运666 2023-03-07

Do I have to use LaTeX typesetting for this?

gitsuck 2023-02-28

Submitted special issue, two reviewers. The first reviewer didn't say much, but the second reviewer provided more detailed feedback. The innovation is weak, and there may be additional parameters in the module. It is necessary to compare with the latest model from last year. Overall, the submission experience was good, and the review process was quite fast, except for the first review which took three months. After revisions, the speed was quick. However, the special issue was not released according to the timeline provided on the official website.

Timeline:
Submit: October 1, 2022
Under review: November 7, 2022
Major revision: January 11, 2023
Revised submission: February 11, 2023
Decision in process: February 15, 2023
Accept: February 21, 2023
Completed accept: February 23, 2023

扁桃体不发言 2023-02-20

How long did the first trial take?

hhhsmx 2022-12-13

Hello, may I ask how long did you spend on the first trial?

Skye风 2022-11-23

Submit special issue on September 30th, major revision given on November 17th, and there are peer reviewers. The comments are constructive, and it needs to be modified well. Hopefully, it can be accepted.

二仙桥居士 2022-11-09

Hello, may I ask which email you used to contact the editor? Was it the person with the username swathi.venkatesan provided by the manuscript submission system-about-contact?

eleanorTT 2022-11-09

I submitted it on August 29th. The official website still shows "with editor" status. I inquired at the end of September and was informed that the manuscript has not been reviewed yet. Someone downstairs said that there will be a response from the official on December 15th. Is there anyone else in the same situation as me?

二仙桥居士 2022-11-08

I would like to ask everyone, my second review has been over 2 months and there is still no response. What is the usual situation for everyone?
Also, how long does it take to be published after acceptance?

大脸猫是卷王 2022-11-04

2022.10.27 Submission
2022.11.03 Rejection, reason given is lack of innovation, um... it's funny, looking at those articles accepted by the journal, they just casually add an attention-grabbing title but don't make their code open-source. Upon closer inspection, all those articles have loopholes. Who's actually bluffing? Haha.
Impressive. I was the first one to do this in the field. Since they don't want it, goodbye. I'll submit to something even more awesome.

gitsuck 2022-11-03

It has been almost a month, and I am still "with editor." The official website promised that the first review notification would be on December 15, 2022, but I don't know if it will actually happen.

gitsuck 2022-10-24

More than 20 days have passed, and it is still "with editor" and not "under review."

Skye风 2022-10-09

The text translates to: "Submitted to SI at 9:30, directly. Number 1 under review. Not sure why it did not go through the editor."

gitsuck 2022-10-06

October 1, 2022, submit Special Issue
October 3, 2022, correct author information and resubmit
October 5, 2022, With Editor

zhouxy2021 2021-03-22

Mid-July 2020 submission
End of October 2020 notification of major revisions
Early December 2020 completion of revisions and submission
Mid-January 2021 notification of minor revisions
End of February 2021 completion of revisions and submission
Early March 2021 notification of acceptance
Two reviewers, one emphasizing application and both times asked me to provide more details on how to use it. The other reviewer provided detailed feedback, with 10 suggestions for major revisions and 6 suggestions for minor revisions.
After two rounds of revisions, there is a noticeable difference compared to the initial draft. I feel that it has improved significantly and I am very grateful to the editor and the reviewers.

兔兔斯基 2021-01-08

The first trial takes 10 months, and the second trial takes almost 6 months. I have been waiting for so long that even the flowers have withered. Why are your research papers so fast~~