xixi0428 2023-07-02

The translation of the text into English is:

In a similar situation as mine, I withdrew and resubmitted. After resubmission, it still went through three reviewers and took over six months. However, it came back as a major revision and was accepted directly after the changes were made. From the first submission to the final acceptance, it took nearly two years.

丢味 2023-04-17

Special thanks to Weiqi Zhou for editing, very efficient and responsible!

丢味 2023-04-17

08.23 submit
09.03 with editor
09.10 under review
10.27 major revision
12.13 with editor
12.17 under review
02.02 under review, updated time (with editor rejection)
04.17 Accepted

无敌破坏汪 2023-02-01

I have experienced being rejected and resubmitting, but after making revisions for a month and sending it back, the editor rejected it again without providing specific reasons.

gyj0619 2023-02-01

The initial review took 4 months and resulted in rejection with the option to resubmit. Both the editor and reviewers acknowledged the presence of innovation but requested significant revisions. The resubmission must include a revision statement. I would like to ask if any colleagues have encountered this situation with the journal and if the chances of acceptance are higher after making the suggested revisions and resubmitting.

公里之花 2022-10-29

After years of conducting interdisciplinary research, the study was innovative and required a significant amount of work. Two reviewers provided detailed feedback, greatly improving the overall quality of the article. The editing process was rigorous. Many additional experiments and arguments were added during the later stages, resulting in a year-long acceptance process. We hope that LANDUP, as a top journal in the field of urban research, continues to thrive and its impact factor continues to rise.

无敌破坏汪 2022-08-01

It took nine months to complete the review process. The initial review took three months, the second review took one and a half months, and the final review took one month. The remaining time was spent in the hands of the editor. Overall, the speed was relatively slow, especially the speed at which the editor processed the manuscripts, which usually took at least half a month. However, the industry recognition is high, so it was worth the time spent. I hope to have 1-2 more LANDUP papers during my doctoral period.

vv亚 2022-05-03

First review took 6 months, with two reviewers providing minor and major revisions respectively. The editor suggested major revisions, and I am very happy to receive the revised manuscript back after 20 days. The two reviewers provided many excellent suggestions that helped improve the paper. Thank you to both reviewers! Thank you to editor Zhou Weiqi! I am grateful! I will continue to work hard in the future and strive for more opportunities to publish in LANDUP!

遥感人 2021-12-05

No, I am a researcher in the field of remote sensing.

雨落凡尘 2021-12-05

Are you referring to the recent publication on the increased flood risk caused by changes in land use in China over the past 40 years?

遥感人 2021-12-05

The country with the highest acceptance rate for submissions is the United States, not China, as you may already know. At the same time, the annual publication volume is quite conservative, with just over 100 articles, making it difficult to ensure high quality.

遥感人 2021-12-05

Rejected by the Nature sub-journal, the work was done on a national scale, with a large amount of data and workload. It took four months from submission to acceptance.

黄里山人 2021-01-11

It has been 3 months, the outcome is unknown, and I am anxious.