Verified Reviews - KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

gogofly 2023-08-09

Rejected, there were 5 reviewers, and 1-2 of them had more negative opinions.

小帅0710 2023-08-09

The opinion is okay, not very negative, and they still rejected it???

呼啦啦sddd 2023-08-08

After the first review was completed, the editor did not come back with any comments. It took nearly 4 months for them to finally send me the feedback. It's quite frustrating. The topic of the paper is one of the three major computer vision tasks.

雁城雨 2023-08-08

The editor directly rejected and said, "Your manuscript does not have the scientific significance required by this journal." Does this mean that my article has major issues, or that it lacks innovation but does not meet the journal's requirements? Do any experts here know? Help me, thank you!

xc9873 2023-08-03

You are so fast. It has been almost 20 days and I still haven't received the result for my RCC.

letpubSCU123 2023-08-03

2023.08.02 Revise Three reviewers

开心一天 2023-08-02

In my system, it shows "under review", but I haven't received any track email.

letpubSCU123 2023-08-02

I don't understand, indeed 2 days is too fast...

letpubSCU123 2023-08-02

Yes, there is a track link.

letpubSCU123 2023-08-02

Not yet released, previously decisions seemed quite fast.

开心一天 2023-08-01

Brothers, after submitting for review, please send an email notification. Did you track it? I haven't received anything.

一往情深2 2023-08-01

Did the third reviewer finish reviewing it in just two days?

sheeperyang 2023-08-01

I am also a 7.31dip. May I ask if your results have come out?

514舍长 2023-07-31

Are you an editing relative? That's too fast!

letpubSCU123 2023-07-31

Record the submission process:

2023.06.17 Submitted, with editor
2023.07.08 Under Review
2023.07.25 Required Review Completed (2 completed)
2023.07.28 Under Review (invited the 3rd reviewer again)
2023.07.30 Required Review Completed
2023.07.31 Decision in Process (waiting, hoping for an opportunity to make revisions)

May I ask, is the "Decision in Process" recently fast or slow? I remember in the past this process took anywhere from a few hours to a day or two, and the editor has always been efficient.

呼啦啦sddd 2023-07-31

Compare the two papers with the AAAI and ICCV of that year. After comparing, if the performance is not better, reject.

昵称怎么都被占了 2023-07-29

I have been waiting for 40 days after submitting, and it has not been reviewed yet.

S 2023-07-28

How can I see how many reviewers have accepted the review? I have been waiting for a long time and haven't received any feedback from the first reviewer yet.

大菠萝hh 2023-07-28

Did it take almost two months for it to be under review? That's so long.

yuyuyun 2023-07-26

2023.5.20 submitted
2023.5.23 with editor
2023.6.8 with editor(AE)
2023.7.9 under review

昵称怎么都被占了 2023-07-24

It has been 35 days with the editor status, is it dead? Should I send an email to inquire?

Acstream 2023-07-20

A few days ago, I also sent a letter to the editor-in-chief, but there has been no response. Yesterday, I separately sent an email to the handle editor's mailbox, and finally received a reply and started processing. It seems that the email system of the editorial manager may not be working.

wusye 2023-07-20

I directly found the editor's email in the research paper online, although I feel like it's not the best way to do it. Sigh.

Acstream 2023-07-18

Brother, may I ask what the email address of the editor-in-chief is?

wusye 2023-07-18

Thank you to the previous contributor for sharing. It's time to summarize and share some information. I hope it will be useful for everyone.

2022.12.10: Submitted, turned into "with editor" after about two days.
2023.02.23: RRC
2023.02.25: Minor revisions
2023.03.20: Revised and submitted
2023.04.15: RRC
2023.06.20: RRC (No response after RRC, sent multiple reminder emails through the system, but received no reply. Many people also experienced no progress after RRC, possibly due to internal issues with the journal. Finally, had no choice but to email the editor-in-chief to handle the situation.)
2023.06.23: Conditional acceptance (mainly for proofreading, can opt not to use the recommended Elsevier proofreading agency in the email)
2023.06.26: Submitted with editor
2023.07.01: Acceptance (skipped RRC stage, directly accepted)

If you are stuck in a specific stage without any response, it is still necessary to remind them. Don't be afraid of rejection, editors often receive reminder emails.

Finally, I wish everyone success in publishing their papers!

pandaandyy 2023-07-15

Jul 11, 2023 Enviado
Jul 11, 2023 Con Editor

Tabe 2023-07-13

7/11 is being reviewed.

一往情深2 2023-07-13

What did you see in the reply that the editor gave you?

letpubSCU123 2023-07-13

It seems that there is no distinction. Excuse me for asking, but can anyone who has recently received manuscript review from KBS tell me how long the review period is usually? It seems to have become slower, this journal. Thank you.

一往情深2 2023-07-13

Hello, may I ask which documents need to be submitted when returning for repair? The editor's email to me mentioned that the revised manuscript should be submitted in Word format. I would like to know if you uploaded the modified draft in Word or LaTeX at that time. In addition to the cover letter and revision note, do I also need to re-upload a series of other files such as highlights? Thank you~

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started