Verified Reviews - JOURNAL OF VISUAL COMMUNICATION AND IMAGE REPRESENTATION
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

夏夜 2023-08-09

Submission Experience:
1.11 Submitted
3.05 Major revision
4.02 Revised and resubmitted
7.16 Accepted
7.22 Pre-proofing
7.29 Online

weLearn 2023-07-26

7.25 submit
7.26 with editor

Translation: Submit on July 25th. With editor on July 26th.

weLearn 2023-07-06

6.25 submit - Submitted on June 25th
6.26 with editor - Under editor's consideration on June 26th
6.30 with editor - Under editor's consideration on June 30th
7.16 under review - Currently being reviewed since July 16th
7.23 under review - Currently being reviewed since July 23rd

DexterYan 2023-05-10

Hello, I would like to ask about the approximate duration of the changes in the status of your manuscript.

Davidtang 2023-02-19

Posted in February 2022, during the Chinese New Year, I couldn't bear it any longer and urged for a response. However, when school started, I received only one review comment, and the editor directly rejected my submission. It was a complete waste of my article.

sunset 2023-01-07

The review comments are quite fair, just the speed is a bit slow. CCF-C has not a very high cost-performance ratio.

sunshine 2022-11-04

10.4 submit
10.11 with editor
10.29 with editor
11.2 under review Unknown outcome, hoping for quick results.

seecin hou 2022-10-30

The response is quite fast and the opinions are very pertinent. Looking forward to better and better.

波妞123 2022-10-26

May I ask the OP how to find the secretary for manuscript returns?

波妞123 2022-10-26

When did the original poster receive the feedback?

wwcczz 2022-10-11

2021.02.08 submitted
2021.05.20 major revision
2021.06.10 submitted the major revision/with editor
2021.06.17 under review
2021.08.20 minor revision
2021.08.25 submitted the minor revision/with editor
2021.10.01 decision in process
2021.10.09 accept

The journal assigned 6 reviewers, and they were quite strict in their review. The overall speed was average, comparable to a typical journal in the second tier of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Wishing for promotion to the second tier soon.

星火 2022-10-09

I highly do not recommend submitting to this journal. It is too slow. I can understand that expert reviews may take two months, but it is too slow for the editors to process a manuscript for 10 days. After waiting for over two months, they only give a "Transfer Pending" decision, which is even worse than rejecting the submission right after I submitted it. At least that way, it wouldn't waste my time.

July 23rd - Submitted
August 6th - Under Review
September 28th - Required Reviews Completed
October 3rd - Decision in Process
October 8th - Rejected (Transfer Pending)

Alpaca_ 2022-05-08

Update:
May 8, 2022 accept
It took a month from "decision in process" to acceptance. I thought maybe the reviewers had conflicting opinions, which made the editor hesitate. However, both reviewers in the email said there were no issues, so I'm not sure why it took so long. Maybe the editor was just busy, haha.

To sum up, the journal's speed is actually not slow. The single "under review" process takes about four months, which is considered average. Normally, with one major revision, it should take around 10-11 months. However, the processes of "with editor" and "decision in process" are a bit slow, each taking one or two months. So, in the end, it took me 13 months and 7 days to get accepted after one major revision. Overall, the speed is a bit slow.

Lastly, thank you to the person above for the support. Indeed, it was not rejected. I don't know if you have submitted as well, but I wish you good luck and hope you get accepted soon.

zfw 2022-04-14

Brother, your decision is in process. It won't be accepted immediately. It shouldn't be rejected either. Don't be nervous, hahaha.

Alpaca_07 2022-04-13

Update:
2022.4.4 required reviews completed
2022.4.13 decision in process
Waiting anxiously...

zfw 2022-04-08

I want to ask the original poster. During the period from August 17th when it was "under review" to "decision in process," did the status of "under review" change?

Alpaca_07 2022-03-09

Update:
Revision submitted on December 24, 2021.
With editor on December 26, 2021.
Under review as of February 14, 2022.
After the modifications, wish me good luck.

hua_938 2022-02-25

I submitted an article in mid-June of the 21st year. One month later, it was under review, and as of the beginning of February of this year, it is still under review. It has been 8 months since the first review, and I still haven't received any results. The process is frustratingly slow.

jackfan 2022-02-22

Hello, may I ask which journal you have switched to?

jackfan 2022-02-22

Hello, may I ask which journal you have transferred to?

jackfan 2022-02-22

Submitted on October 12, 2021, it was reviewed three months later on January 12, 2022, and was rejected on February 5th. There were two reviewers in total. The first one made minor revisions, while the second one provided a lot of feedback. They pointed out my grammar mistakes and inconsistencies in verb tenses. They also criticized that my paper lacked sufficient innovation and scrutinized it in great detail. They compared the contributions made by the references I cited with my own work, stating that my contribution to the field of tracking was insufficient. They suggested rejecting the paper... It's disheartening... Are the requirements so strict even in third-tier journals?

Zyric 2022-01-14

I submitted an article in mid-August 2021. After waiting for 3 months, I sent two reminders, but there was no response. After waiting for 4 months, I sent three more reminders, but received the same robotic replies. After waiting for 5 months, I asked a friend to contact the Editor-in-Chief, and the status changed to "Decision in Process". It has been two more weeks, but it still hasn't changed... This journal is considered to be of a lower level, and it takes 5 and a half months to review a submission? What's going on? I have already had two articles accepted elsewhere after a two-month delay. Usually, our participation deadline for reviewing is only one month, and I usually reply within two weeks.

I will notify the secretary to withdraw my manuscript and submit it elsewhere. From now on, I will no longer pay attention to this journal. It has caused a lot of harm~

uw21 2021-12-08

Now it is under review.

zfw 2021-12-08

Hello. I would like to ask, what is the current status of JVCIR?

uw21 2021-10-30

October 25th, Submitted
October 25th, With Editor
October 30th, The status has changed, but still With Editor.

Alpaca_ 2021-10-22

Update:
October 13, 2021 - Decision in process
October 22, 2021 - Major revision

Originally, I thought it would be a mediocre journal, but the reviewer's comments surprised me. One reviewer, who seems to be a junior colleague, provided more than ten valuable suggestions that hit the key points. Another reviewer, who is probably a senior colleague, only pointed out grammar and formatting issues, but in great detail, almost catching every single one. Regardless of the final outcome, I must give them a positive review. I wish the journal continuous improvement and an early promotion to the second tier.

Alpaca_07 2021-10-13

Update: October 13, 2021 Required Reviews Completed

wxfeng 2021-09-28

Finally received the news on August 10th, I was rejected. I have now switched to another option.

Burning6 2021-09-26

2021.05.28 Submitted
2021.06.10 Under review
2021.08.04 Major revision
2021.08.13 Submitted the major revision/With editor
2021.08.17 Under review
2021.09.14 Decision in process
2021.09.20 Decision in process
2021.09.25 Accept

Translation:

2021.05.28 Submitted
2021.06.10 Under review
2021.08.04 Major revision
2021.08.13 Submitted the major revision/With editor
2021.08.17 Under review
2021.09.14 Decision in process
2021.09.20 Decision in process
2021.09.25 Accept

JeffreyWong 2021-07-08

Submitted in late December 2020, received the first review information in late April 2021. Two reviewers provided a lot of comments. Personally, I believe that the two reviewers are colleagues in the same field and not particularly familiar with the specific area of research. Therefore, they asked some slightly strange questions, which were difficult to answer. Submitted revised manuscript and response to comments at the end of May 2021, received acceptance notice by the end of June 2021. Personally, I feel that the process was slightly slow, but the difficulty of the journal should not be particularly high. As long as the editor provides revision suggestions, the chances of acceptance are high if the revisions are made according to the editor's suggestions.

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now