xxcccccc 2023-08-08

As a traditional top journal in the field of chemistry, ACIE differs from JACS in that the initial review of the articles is conducted by professional editors rather than frontline chemists. Therefore, it is important for the articles to emphasize the innovative aspects, application value, and other relevant points. "Telling a good story" helps the editors quickly identify the highlights and challenges of the article.

In my case, the article was reviewed within two days, and the reviewer's comments were received after two weeks. After two minor revisions, the article was resubmitted and accepted on the same day. It went quite smoothly!

fighttu12 2023-08-02

First submission to JACS on April 25th, 2023. Surprisingly, it took 17 days in the hands of the senior editor without being sent for review.
Changed submission to Angew on May 11th, 2023. Under review within a week.
Received comments on June 9th, 2023. It went through arbitration and was rejected and resubmitted after major and minor revisions. Luckily, the editor gave the opportunity for resubmission.
Resubmitted after experiment modifications on July 6th, 2023.
Received comments on July 31st, 2023. All reviewers agreed to accept, but the editor raised a few formatting issues.
Revised and resubmitted in the middle of the night on July 3rd, in revision.
Accepted on August 1st, 2023, and soon after went online.
The submission process was somewhat stressful, and I often visited the forum to read about others' submission experiences. As a small researcher, I was very lucky to have my work recognized. It was fortunate that I had the courage to start from scratch. In answering questions, I also experienced the enlightenment of persevering. I wish Angew continued success!

Javey Zhu 2023-07-03

Is the editor Ye?

刘上人侃侃 2023-07-02

The result of the 29th was rejected. It went through two rounds of review. In the first round, there were two reviewers, one positive and one negative. The editor then found two more reviewers, but only one negative review was received. However, after reading the review comments, they were actually quite peaceful and did not deny the novelty. They just raised questions about the experimental results in the introduction.

揍他个小舅子 2023-06-29

Did the two big shots come up with the results?

乘风2023 2023-06-28

Journals prefer novel structures and have high requirements for the quality of single crystals. They also have high expectations for the novelty and completeness of the stories. It is best if the research results have a certain degree of universality and wide applicability!

Javey Zhu 2023-06-25

I have also been under review for two months now, probably because the reviewers are busy.

刘上人侃侃 2023-06-22

There are no results yet. I will remain calm for now.

一万次的开始 2023-06-18

Is there a result now? Boss.

一万次的开始 2023-06-18

Boss, is there any result now?

小太阳2022 2023-06-13

Hello sisters, Angew's editing speed is very fast, it just depends on the reviewer. I have encountered 20 days, 30 days, and even over 50 days for review. Don't worry, I wish all the sisters a smooth submission! In my personal experience, slower manuscripts are often not rejected. Keep it up!

刘上人侃侃 2023-06-12

Family, seeking clarification. The submission to Angewandte Chemie was made on April 20th, and it seems like it was sent for review on either April 23rd or 26th. However, it is still under review until today. Previously, the results for submissions from our research group usually came out within 30 days. I wonder if Angewandte Chemie has recently slowed down the review process? Hoping for good luck.

小太阳2022 2023-06-09

Angew Chem is more friendly and cheerful than JACS in terms of submission and atmosphere! It is important to tell a good story, and special attention should be paid to broad interest in abstracts and introductions.
Compared to specialized journals like JACS, Angew Chem not only reports Research Articles, Communications, and Reviews, but also includes some information on the birthdays of famous people and obituaries of chemists, making it suitable for science communication to chemists in every subfield!
Once a manuscript is submitted to Angew Chem, as long as it goes through the review process and the reviewers provide feedback, addressing the feedback point by point with sincerity is not a big issue!
Overall, Angew Chem may be slightly slower than JACS in terms of processing speed!

小太阳2022 2023-06-09

Fill in the Comment to Editor section in the EM system for the Cover Letter, no need to upload a separate file.

小太阳2022 2023-06-09

In the EM system, please fill in the "comment to editor" section of the Cover Letter. No need to upload a separate file.

小太阳2022 2023-06-09

Personal experience is best suited to templates! You can first copy all the text and insert the image at the end!

小太阳2022 2023-06-09

Angew Chem Submission Process:
2022.11.10 First submission
2022.11.15 Under review
2022.12.24 Review comments Reviewer: 1 Highly Important 20% 1 Important 24 questions Supplementary experiments, post-pandemic, holiday Editor's decision: Resubmit
2023.03.28 Second submission Response: 10,000 words
2023.03.28 Under review (within 3 hours on the same day)
2023.04.28 Review comments Reviewer: 1 Very Important 5% 1 Highly Important 20% 8 questions Editor's decision: Major revision in 14 days
2023.05.09 Third submission Response: 6,000 words
2023.05.09 Under review (within 3 hours on the same day)
2023.06.02 Acceptance Reviewer: 1 Very Important 5% 1 Highly Important 20% Also received request to upload PDF with deleted modification traces
2023.06.02 Uploaded PDF with deleted yellow background modification traces confirmed, online after 3 hours.

book_liu 2023-04-25

Thank you very much for your answer.

长庚 2023-04-24

Feb-23-2023 Submitted to Journal
Feb-23-2023 With editor (Received notice of assigned editor in the evening)
Feb-26-2023 Under Review (Logged into the submission system three days later and found out it was sent for external review, got a little excited)
Mar-20-2023 Major revision (Received several significant revisions from the first reviewer, made revisions in the morning, received a rejection letter from the editor in the afternoon, was shocked, then received another email stating the previous one was sent by mistake, please ignore it. Sent for external review in the evening)
Apr-6-2023 Accept (Very efficient)
This article was initially submitted to JACS and was rejected without review; then submitted to ACS Energy Letters, still rejected without review, and was advised to transfer to ACS AMI. Later, directly submitted to Angew, underwent review and received highly positive evaluations from the editor and two reviewers, and finally accepted. This is the first Angew article from our research group. Thank you, editor! Thank you, reviewers!

接接接啊 2023-04-06

May I ask if the cover letter should be sent directly to the editor or submitted together with the system?

接接接啊 2023-04-06

May I ask if I should send the cover letter directly to the editor or submit it together in the system?

cc-thri 2023-03-31

There is a template, it is best to follow the template.

木易angus 2023-03-30

230327 Submission to Angew
230330 Suggestion to submit to Small or Small structures
Previously suggested submitting to AEM and received confirmation
Now suggesting to submit to Small in addition to Angew, but I don't want to submit anymore
Changing publishing company, wish me good luck!

Leve 2023-03-30

Second revision, I received an email, but it has been four days and the status is still "In Revision". What could be the reason? Shouldn't it be "Submit" or "With Editor"?

GGD 2023-03-27

How long did the first trial take?

庆 2023-03-24

Two minor revisions were made. One suggestion is to switch to AOM. The editor has given a major revision, which has been returned for 10 days. The outcome is unknown and I am feeling anxious.

zhaoqi 2023-03-18

May I ask, is it necessary to use the template provided in the Author Guidelines of angew for submission?

book_liu 2023-03-15

May I ask if the submission to angew must be in the format of the official website's two-column layout, or if a regular Word document with double spacing is acceptable? I hope those who have submitted before can answer. Thank you very much.

我不是科研狗 2023-02-21

May I have the opportunity to read your article?

田所浩二 2023-02-21

20221201 Submission
20221204 Under review
20221219 Received first round of revision comments, major revision
20230107 Submitted revised paper
20230110 Revised paper under review
20230116 Received second round of revision comments, minor revision
20230122 Submitted paper with minor revisions
20230123 Under review
20230125 Accepted
20230126 Submitted the accepted version of the paper after removing yellow highlights in the submission system
20230126 Paper publicly available on the official website
20230206 Received proof
20230208 Submitted proof after modifications
20230210 Final version officially published

Very efficient submission. Thanks to Associate Editor Mathias Wiechen for the support and the two reviewers for their revision comments. I received the major revision comments on the sixth day of being infected with COVID-19. Despite the difficulties, I overcame them and finally completed the revisions. This paper was done by myself, without any co-first authors, co-corresponding authors, or collaborating institutions. I didn't rely on any famous names, but solely on my own abilities to publish it!