frybeef 2023-08-02

This person has invested too much in OA.

lucyy 2023-07-29

The editor is very irresponsible. The reviewers they found are not professional at all and seem to have no knowledge in the field. It feels like the reviewers didn't even read my article. They said I didn't write certain things and that my model is wrong. The content the reviewers said I didn't write is actually covered in the corresponding section of my third chapter. If the editor had just taken the time to read my article along with the reviewers' comments, they would realize how outrageous it is. This editor is also not like editors from other journals who frequently send emails. In the rejection letter, the editor did not provide their own opinion on the article. They only sent emails for submission, peer review, and rejection. I didn't even know the editor's name before receiving the rejection letter, as the previous two emails were automated replies.

不会迷路的麋鹿 2023-06-06

2023/4/24/ submit.
2023/5/24/ major revision and modification. Two reviewers are interested in the article and provide friendly feedback, giving 20 days for revisions.
2023/6/2/ resubmit.
2023/6/5/ accepted.

於瑜屿玉 2023-02-10

In English, the text "22年大小分区都是二区了" translates to "In the year 22, both the large and small zones are Zone 2."

於瑜屿玉 2023-02-10

Two weeks after submission, there was a major revision. One week after resubmission, it was accepted. The speed was quite fast. The reviewers were very meticulous and responsible, providing detailed suggestions, which was great. 666666666.

时光印记 2022-11-14

How long does it usually take with the editor? It has been a week for me already, do we need confirmation from all co-authors before it can be submitted for review?

a 2022-09-22

2022.8.5 submitted to the journal
2022.8.7 with editor
2022.8.8 under review
2022.8.29 minor revision
2022.9.14 revision submitted to the journal
2022.9.15 with editor
2022.9.17 accepted

Translated:
Submitted to the journal on August 5, 2022.
With editor on August 7, 2022.
Under review on August 8, 2022.
Minor revision on August 29, 2022.
Revision submitted to the journal on September 14, 2022.
With editor on September 15, 2022.
Accepted on September 17, 2022.

smilesgly 2022-04-24

Apr 21, 2022 Submission, Apr 22, 2022 With Editor

ZHAO J C 2022-01-27

Posted on January 3rd. Under review on January 9th. Required reviews completed on January 26th.

搬砖的皮皮虾 2022-01-26

Journal Log:
Jan 17, 2022 Editor Decision - Accept
Nov 30, 2021 Ad Hoc from Author support@elsevier.com 1
Jun 26, 2021 Author Submits Revision Confirmation
Jun 26, 2021 PDF Built and Requires Approval
Jun 20, 2021 Author Revision First Reminder
May 28, 2021 Editor Decision - Revise

搬砖的皮皮虾 2022-01-26

Mar 01, 2021: Author Notice of Manuscript Number
Feb 27, 2021: Author Submits New Manuscript Confirmation
Feb 27, 2021: PDF Built and Requires Approval
Feb 20, 2021: AuthorAutoReminder-Incomplete Submission
I returned the manuscript at the end of June 2021 and received a decision in progress on August 8th. It continued like this until the end of November when I followed up.
It took a year for the resubmission to be accepted, but fortunately, I don't urgently need this paper.

搬砖的皮皮虾 2022-01-26

Super slow.
First submission on Dec 23, 2020, rejected on Jan 26, 2021 by a journal in the third zone of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. The editor-in-chief assigned five reviewers, which shows their high regard for my work. Overall, each reviewer was quite positive, but they still found some flaws to nitpick. As a result, I argued with the editor-in-chief, who eventually agreed to reconsider the submission.

smilesgly 2022-01-18

It has been a week since I have been with my editor.

我爱吃芒果z 2021-10-25

Posted on Jun 27, 2021, and received minor revisions two months after the initial review. Accepted on Oct 25, 2021. Overall, the speed is considered acceptable. Wishing the journal continued success!

Tenacity 2021-10-05

Probably about two weeks.

SDUT-SSK 2021-07-21

How long will it take? Can someone please share?

EchoGee 2021-06-29

I don't understand, should I look at the upgraded version or the basic version for partitioning?

hucy 2021-03-17

Posted at the end of July 20, this time there were possibly more submissions, and a manuscript number was assigned in early August, one week later. In mid-September, review comments were provided, with a few minor suggestions from two reviewers. The editor requested minor revisions. In mid-October, the manuscript was returned for revisions and remained under review until it was accepted on March 15th, 21. In the meantime, the editor mentioned that the original reviewers unfortunately contracted COVID-19...thus, the process was delayed.

奋斗的笔者 2021-01-15

The main issue is with the format of this journal, so changing it to a monthly publication and expediting the review process would be beneficial. Nonetheless, this journal is still very good.