TV唯物主义 2021-11-22

"Boss, may I ask how many reviewers are usually involved?"

niki945945 2021-11-17

October 5 - Submission
October 6 - Preliminary review by the editor-in-chief
October 10 - Assigned to specific editor (revolution is halfway successful after passing the preliminary review stage)
October 12 - Under review
October 17 - Required reviews completed (the reviewers finished their work in just 5 days, a chilling feeling...)
October 25 - Feedback received, major revisions, 2 months (from thinking it was hopeless to having major revisions, still feeling happy...)
November 11 - Uploaded revised manuscript
November 14 - Accepted. The speed is really fast. From submission to acceptance in one month, impressive.
I am working in the field of ceramic glaze, a very traditional one. This is my 3rd paper in this field.

Kevin520 2021-11-16

11.15 submitted translates to "11.15 has been submitted" in English.

Kevin520 2021-11-16

P1: Submitted 9.28
Approximately one week later, under review.
The middle date changed three to four times.
Under review 11.03.

Kevin520 2021-11-16

June 23 submitted
July 19 major revise
September 12 submitted revised draft
September 1 accepted

阿福 2021-11-11

Ou Tao is the first to arrive as the chief editor. The chief editor assigns the deputy chief editor, who then assigns the editors. The editors assign the reviewers. Generally, it takes two to three weeks before the review process begins. The review process usually takes a little over a month.

yield 2021-11-08

Mine too, on October 10th it was like this, and it still is now. Do I need to send an email to the editor?

科研小菜菜111 2021-10-28

Excuse me, "Do you love scientific research, too?" Have you got your results yet? I am still in this state and I don't know what happened to Otto.

大爷也爱科研 2021-10-21

I am also in the same situation. The required reviews have been completed since September 19th, and it is still the same status on October 21st.

科研小菜菜111 2021-10-15

I completed the required reviews for October 1st. It's still in the same status at the moment. Previously, it would take about a week to get the results in this status. It has been two weeks this time. I hope it doesn't get rejected and I'm hoping for a positive outcome.

Trifles 2021-10-07

Eu Tao is very efficient. The first review is usually completed within a month, and the second review often only takes three to five days. Even if the reviewers are from the same field, their opinions are very objective.

king-8888 2021-09-24

Posted on September 13th, arrived in the hands of the chief editor on September 15th, assigned to the second editor on September 19th, and then assigned to another editor on September 22nd. Until now, it is still with the editor. I don't understand why there have been so many changes in editors??????

Primary scholar：Mr.G 2021-09-22

7.31 - Sent to journal
8.2 - With editor
8.9 - Under review
8.11 - Change in review time
9.8 - Compulsory minor revision
9.16 - Sent to journal, with editor, no further review
9.20 - Accepted
9.21 - Final manuscript editing

Primary scholar：Mr.G 2021-09-14

Is "compulsory minor revision" the same as "minor revision"? If it's a minor revision, how long should it take to return for appropriate rework if given two months?

Primary scholar：Mr.G 2021-09-14

Isn't the classification of this engineering and technology category on top supposed to be Zone 2? Which one should be considered as Zone 1 or Zone 2?

小学者伟伟 2021-09-14

I would like to ask, how long does it take for Outao to accept online?

kkkkkkeyan 2021-08-26

Is there any news now? I've been waiting for 23 days, and still with the editor. The status has changed once in relation to time, and then there has been no news since. Is it possible that the editor is on vacation?

shayebuhui 2021-08-25

26 May 2021 Submission
16 Jul 2021 Accept

One repair in between, very efficient.

没事看文章 2021-08-25

Has it been reviewed? Mine has also been a month.

Dd 2021-08-19

Why is it so slow now? It has been a month since submission and it is still being edited, not sent for review.

zhibo8 2021-07-26

My processing editor is J. Vleugels.
I submitted it in early April, and the under review date has changed several times between May 16th.

keyanren 2021-07-25

I submitted my work at the end of February, and the initial review process was completed in early May. I have been waiting for the editor to handle it, and now it's the end of July, and I am still waiting for the editor's response. It has been two months since I have been waiting for the editor to handle it. Who should I talk to about this?

zhibo8 2021-07-21

Starting from May, under review until now, I have been extremely envious of your reviewing speed...

大大大书童 2021-07-18

Submission experience: Submitted on May 3rd, received major revision comments on June 1st. One reviewer raised 7 minor issues, and the editor raised 8 minor issues. Returned for revision on July 13th, received minor revision from the editor on the same day. Returned for revision again on July 16th, and it was accepted on the same day. There were some personal matters in between, so it took over a month to revise, luckily it was accepted.

MLcutecat 2021-07-05

Currently, I have become the leader in the ceramic industry. I am focused on thermal spraying. On February 28th, I submitted a short paper and it went through three rounds of under review. I couldn't find any reviewers, so Editor Robert Vassen reviewed it himself. He gave me a major revision with over 40 issues, ranging from minor tense errors to more complex ones. His suggestions were very professional and some were quite challenging. It's amazing how experts in the field stand out. After carefully addressing all the comments, it was accepted three days later. I wish the journal continued success.

Doccys 2021-06-17

After the review, the email containing the editor's signature will only be received with the reviewer's comments.

lsldzhn 2021-06-11

How do you know which editor the article has been handed to?

lsldzhn 2021-06-11

How do you know who has the manuscript? I have been waiting for more than 20 days and it still says "With editor".

sasadaf 2021-06-06

The first draft was submitted on April 16th. The editor-in-chief conducted the initial review for 3 days and then handed it over to the senior editor, Vincent, for 4 days of review. It was then passed on to Barbara Malic for processing and sent for review on May 10th. The review comments were returned on May 31st. On June 4th, the tragedy was notified that one reviewer emphasized innovation and did not provide specific evaluations. Overall, it is not bad. If it had been reviewed by Mei Tao, the review time might have been longer.

yk6551953 2021-05-18

Submitted before Christmas, received reviewer comments in February. There were four reviewers who provided very detailed and numerous comments. Personally, I procrastinated and only started revising after one and a half months. After revising, I received second-round comments after around one month, and only one reviewer insisted that I cite their article. After arguing with the editor, the editor decisively accepted it. Both the editor and reviewers at Eurotao are experts and there is no absolute authority, but the editor has more power.