Verified Reviews - JOURNAL OF SOLID STATE ELECTROCHEMISTRY
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

阿兴 2023-04-16

Posted on November 26, 2022.
Minor revisions on December 23, 2022, with 11 comments provided by two reviewers.
Revised manuscript submitted on December 30, 2022.
Accepted on January 10, 2023. The editing speed is still acceptable.

hejb 2023-04-13

Why your paper was sent back for resubmission is because you took too long, and if it were published, it would extend the review time of the journal. By resubmitting as a new paper, the review process for your paper will be expedited to a daily basis.

飞杨123 2023-02-17

The review comments were provided within a month, and the article was accepted just two days after resubmission. The process was indeed very fast.

danniel 2023-02-05

No layout fee required.

danniel 2023-02-05

The editing process is very fast, and the reviewers are very professional. Looking forward to the increase in the impact factor of the journal.

zzx0627 2022-12-26

How can I contact it to urge for the submission? Is there an email address?

孟孟子旋 2022-11-08

The processing is very fast, the reviewer's comments are very fair, it is a very good journal, and I hope it will continue to improve!

李博博 2022-09-19

Hello, does this journal charge a page fee? Thank you!

李博博 2022-09-19

After acceptance, a contract still needs to be signed. Does this mean they do not waive the publication fee? Will this journal ultimately charge a publication fee?

macyuan123 2022-07-30

Journal review is fast, with feedback received in 11 days. There were four reviewers who provided around thirty to forty comments. I took almost a year to make revisions, haha. As expected, my submission was rejected. However, the editor acknowledged that I made most of the requested changes and encouraged me to resubmit. I made the revisions in three days and received acceptance in two days. I appreciate the editor's prompt and efficient handling. I hope the journal doesn't decline in quality.

1995@ecut 666 2022-03-09

Very fast, highly efficient.

嘉嘉sunshine 2021-12-17

2021.10.15 submitted
2021.10.17 with editor
2021.11.13 rejected and encouraged resubmission, a total of 5 reviewers - Some experiments were supplemented and explained (except for one reviewer who was a bit critical, the others were very fair and gave constructive feedback)
2021.12.07 revised
2021.12.16 accepted
Thank you to Editor Ezequiel Pedro Marcos Leiva for giving me the opportunity to make revisions. German journals are indeed very rigorous!

YY-JC 2021-11-09

Hello, does this journal charge a page fee?

fjdfklsjie 2021-06-11

It took over five months and was rejected. There were three reviewers, one of whom was extremely unprofessional, biased, and had a serious lack of understanding in this field. The reviewers were also unfamiliar with the journal's review process and didn't even know how to view the original figures of the submitted manuscript. Each review process took about a month and a half, and the manuscript went through three rounds of review. Originally, the journal's impact factor was not high, and they nitpicked on various aspects. The reason for the final rejection was baseless. The research group's professor stated that they will never submit to this journal again.

山东响马 2021-05-18

submit to journal 03-12
under review 03-13
major revise 04-14
submit to journal 05-09
minor revise 05-14
submit to journal 05-15
accept 05-18

The given text is already in English.

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now