巨人的手腕 2023-08-07

Rejection. Both reviewers provided many comments, but they both mentioned a lack of innovative points and insufficient depth in explaining the mechanism. I am planning to add more content and hope it can be a reference for everyone. Keep up the good work!

巨人的手腕 2023-08-05

Is the update on 8.4 changing to "Decision in Process"? Is this going to be a rhythm of nothingness?

巨人的手腕 2023-08-02

After two updates under review, 7.31 rrc.

是周姑娘 2023-07-28

2023.5.18 submitted
2023.5.23 with editor
2023.5.26 under review
2023.7.18 under review (continuing in this state)

投完还想投 2023-07-27

I want to ask if the manuscript reminder will be rejected directly. It has been 14 days since I submitted it to the editor...

投完还想投 2023-07-25

It has been 12 days with the editor, won't it be the same as the original poster...

投完还想投 2023-07-25

I have been with the editor for 12 days. Oh my goodness...

什么时候能见刊 2023-07-07

As expected, it was rejected.

什么时候能见刊 2023-07-06

2023.06.25 submit
2023.06.27 with editor
2023.07.05 decision in process
Most likely it's not looking good, ahhhhhhh I'm crying, fortunately the editor's processing speed is still relatively fast.

11510 2023-06-21

Super slow, it has been 2 months since submission and it's still in "with editor" status. I sent a reminder letter, but the editor didn't even read it or reply. They didn't reject or send it for review either. If you're not a big shot in that field, don't bother submitting because the editor won't handle it anyway. Truly disappointing.

一条小锦李 2023-06-12

Do you need to provide the code?

一条小锦李 2023-06-12

Do you need to provide code or raw data?

巨人的手腕 2023-06-08

ESM was rejected and it is suggested to submit to three journals: CEJ, EA, and JPS. JPS was chosen, but it turned out to be very slow. It has been more than 10 days with no progress from the editor. Oh my, please give some good news soon!

mbcyy 2023-05-31

No wonder this journal was kicked to the second tier. Let's not talk about the slow speed, it's so slow that it's practically dead. Moreover, it's impossible for small groups to even think about it. Lastly, it's extremely disgusting to make decisions without peer review. Everyone knows it's a rejection, so just reject it directly. There's no need for continuous decision-making, it's absolutely ridiculous for it to take a month.

WANG Hongjiao 2023-05-22

2.27 Submission
3.10 Reviewing
4.03 Major revision
4.19 Return for revision
5.01 Minor revision
5.08 Revised
5.22 Accepted

vector-B 2023-04-26

"No modification and directly hired? You are amazing. I am envious."

小学渣 2023-04-26

2023.3 Submission
2023.4 Accepted
Already published online, this is the smoothest one!!!

leo07 2023-03-29

2022.10.17 submit - Submitted on October 17, 2022
2022.11.7 under review - Under review since November 7, 2022
2023.2.20 major revision - Major revision required by February 20, 2023
2023.3.28 accept - Accepted on March 28, 2023

ida1997 2023-03-14

2022.12.31 submit - Submitted on December 31, 2022.
2023.1.3 technical check - Technical check done on January 3, 2023.
2023.1.5 under review - Under review since January 5, 2023.
2023 2.1 minor revision - Minor revision requested on February 1, 2023.
2023.3.4 accept - Accepted on March 4, 2023.
编辑处理很快 两个审稿专家 如果超过15天左右编辑会催审一次 - The editing process is fast. If it exceeds about 15 days, the editor will urge the reviewers once.

Mark 2023-02-18

Very good journal, I have read many articles from JPS. The review process this time was very fast.
2022.12.15 submitted
2023.1.3 RRC (Reviewer Comments Received)
2023.1.9 Revision
2023.1.26 Resubmit
2023.2.7 RRC (Reviewer Comments Received)
2023.2.15 Accept

efas 2023-01-31

Congratulations, may I ask what type of paper you submitted and if it can be accepted directly?

木糖醇口香糖 2023-01-15

2022.9.26 Submission
2022.12.5 First review comments
2022.12.21 Return
2023.1.13 Acceptance
Thank you for the strong support from the editor. The progress is following a normal cycle pattern, but compared to other journals, it is slightly longer. Wishing the journal continued success!

Snoopy- 2023-01-09

9.25 submit to journal
9.27 Technical Check ——— resubmitted
9.29 with editor
10.12 under review
10.21 under review
10.29 under review
11.9 under review
11.21 Required reviews complete
11.28 major revision
12.9 resubmit
12.11 under review
12.25 RRC
12.26 minor revise, resubmit, with editor
12.27 under review
12.30 RRC
1.8 accept

Translation:
9.25 - Submitted to journal
9.27 - Technical check - Resubmitted
9.29 - With editor
10.12 - Under review
10.21 - Under review
10.29 - Under review
11.9 - Under review
11.21 - Required reviews complete
11.28 - Major revision
12.9 - Resubmit
12.11 - Under review
12.25 - RRC (Required reviews complete)
12.26 - Minor revision, resubmit, with editor
12.27 - Under review
12.30 - RRC (Required reviews complete)
1.8 - Accept

弘木 2023-01-05

12.24 minor revision
12.30 submission
12.31 Under Review
1.4 Accept
Thank you to the editor and reviewers. The review process is still ongoing during the holidays.
I hope JPS Journal continues to improve.

Ryan Zhang 2022-12-27

The manuscript I have now has been under review for a long time, and it has been two months already, but the first-round result has not been released.

弘木 2022-12-24

It should be Christmas holiday.

弘木 2022-12-23

Reply [It's Miss Zhou]: The first time RRC usually takes about 1-2 days to get the results, and we are still waiting for the results of the second time RRC on the third day now.

弘木 2022-12-23

11.17 major revision - November 17th, significant changes made
12.07 submission - December 7th, document or work submitted
12.21 required reviews complete - December 21st, mandatory evaluations finished

happykeyan 2022-12-04

CEJ was rejected and it is recommended to submit elsewhere. Submitted again on August 27th, it took about three weeks for the editor to send it for review. The result was only one reviewer agreed to review it. On October 8th, the reviewer returned with comments. Until now, it has been almost two months and there has been no invitation for new reviewers. Sending reminder emails did not help either. I cannot submit to this journal anymore in the future.

学术小虎阳 2022-12-02

2022.10.14 Initial submission
2022.10.17 Technical review not approved, resubmitted after modification
2022.10.18 Under review
2022.11.04 Major revision
2022.11.23 Response to comments
2022.12.01 Accepted
The process has been relatively smooth and fast, with a high journal impact factor (about to exceed 10). However, last year the journal's classification by the Chinese Academy of Sciences changed from Zone 1 to Zone 2. We hope the journal continues to improve.