摘星星 2022-06-08

The speed of reviewing is decent, but the expertise of the reviewers is worrying. It is estimated that they did not review it carefully.

huiww 2022-03-24

The article was initially submitted in October 2021 and was rejected in mid-November. It was resubmitted at the end of November and received major revisions on December 17. After making the necessary changes, it was submitted again at the end of December. On January 21, 2022, minor revisions were requested, and after making the modifications on February 10, it was resubmitted. On March 9, minor revisions were requested again, and after making the modifications on March 12, it was resubmitted. Finally, on March 24, it was accepted. The speed of the manuscript handling was acceptable, with the time from reviewer scoring to receiving comments being around two weeks on average, and it did not exceed one month at most. The only downside was that there were several rounds of revisions (it took five revisions before acceptance). Overall, it was still acceptable, and the comments were fair and constructive.