kittyone 2022-12-09

The direction I took was a bit off, and many people didn't understand it. Regarding the neurobiological mechanisms of brain-machine interfaces and mind control, I submitted to many journals. The basic situation was that most reviewers couldn't understand it. Later, I found out that this journal had published relevant articles before, so I submitted it. After 30 days, I received the result and the editor asked me to supplement the experiment and resubmit it. The experiment was not very difficult, just some staining of slices and so on. I supplemented it and sent it back in 30 days. It was returned for minor revisions, which took 10 days to complete. They asked me to change the format, and after I made the changes and submitted it, it was accepted in two days. It took a total of 126 days, which is considered fast. This journal is well-established, and the editors are very professional. The key is that they can understand it. It's not easy for them to understand my article. Overall, I feel that this journal is fast and professional, and the editors have a high level of autonomy. It's worth submitting to, but of course it needs to be aligned with the journal's focus, otherwise it's not easy to submit.

老骥伏枥1987 2022-10-31

Both submissions in 2020 and 2022 were excellent. The first review result was received in about one and a half months for both submissions, and both were conditionally accepted. The reviewers' suggestions were pertinent, and they had a positive evaluation of the articles. The editor mentioned that making slight modifications according to the reviewers' suggestions would enable the submissions to be accepted.