逍遥小猪猪 2023-01-13

Extremely slow, RRC has been silent for a long time. After urging, they rejected it. Six reviewers... it's really disgusting. Three minor revisions, two major revisions, one rejection. They just rejected it. The journal is average. I won't submit to it again in the future, and I won't review for them either.

cryst 2022-12-26

May I ask how long it took for you to receive the notification for your required reviews completed? It has been two weeks since my article also reached the required reviews completed stage, and I haven't received any updates.

hanksmithzx 2022-09-22

8.17: Submitted paper on the simulation of MoS2 nanocomposites as negative electrodes with the addition of phase fields.
8.20: Received article number from the editor.
8.23: Some minor issues need to be addressed and confirmed.
8.30: Under review.
9.5: Two reviewers, major revision required for data.
9.18: Revised.
9.20: Second reviewer provided minor comments.
9.21: Revised and accepted on the same day. The editor is Kosmas Prassides, an expert in condensed matter physics from Tohoku University in Japan. The whole process took a little over a month, which is faster than many top journals. It was indeed a pleasant surprise!

cuancuan 2022-03-09

Article on JAC transfer. Synthesis + Minor performance
Received 23 December 2021;
Minor Revision 6 February 2022;
Received in revised form 16 February 2022;
Accepted 2 March 2022;
Online 2 March 2022.
Overall fast, hoping the journal will continue to improve!

JinHong G 2022-02-25

February 7th, submit.
February 14th, improve image quality.
February 22nd, submit.

Function 2022-01-24

Posted in August 2021, returned in November, one reviewer made minor revisions, avoiding Christmas, returned in January 2022, accepted one week later.
For your reference.

Adair 2021-09-24

Under review should be over by now. It has been two weeks since the required reviews were completed, and the editor still hasn't notified us... I heard this magazine is really slow.

生的倔强和坚持 2021-05-28

Submission in January.
Received review comments in March (review comments are not sent to email, they are generated on the website, remember to check them in a timely manner). The review comments from two reviewers are tricky.
Made revisions until the end of April, and three days later, the final version was online.
The journal is good, with no more than 500 articles per year.

论文小写手 2021-04-22

The review process has been nearly five months, is it normal?

论文小写手 2021-01-24

It has already been under review for 50 days. ?