Verified Reviews - Journal of Neuroinflammation
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

岸部 2023-01-06

Record the entire submission process.
September 25, 2022 - Submitted.
October 22, 2022 - Revised, requested to return in 14 days.
(Delayed revision due to email, requested two extensions)
December 18, 2022 - Resubmitted.
January 3, 2023 - Article accepted.
January 5, 2023 - Proofreading.
Reflection: This journal has a very fast processing efficiency. Although the two reviewers had few comments, they requested important experiments to be conducted (including negative experiments and staining of different types of neural cells). Looking back, these experiments have greatly enhanced my article. Overall, the journal focuses more on neuroimmunology, and it may require providing exquisite tissue fluorescent staining for more persuasiveness. According to the new ranking of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, this journal is still in the top category 1 of medicine, indicating that this established journal on neuroinflammation still has great potential. I wish everyone good news.

没有蛀牙 2022-06-25

I have been working with the editor for a month now.

shjwhg 2022-05-07

This magazine is really slow, so if you are in a hurry, please don't submit. The assigned editor needs at least one month or more.

Jangdou 2022-03-29

May I ask if a summary needs to be sent as a pre-submission email?

zou9190 2022-02-07

The first manuscript self-submitted by the graduate student is a review on neuroinflammation. It took three months from submission to acceptance after minor revisions. Now, the second self-submitted manuscript, which is a research paper, is also submitted to the same journal. This time, it has been a more difficult journey. It encountered a reviewer who abandoned the review, and it took almost a month to find a third reviewer. Therefore, the first round of review took about two months. Then came major revisions, minor revisions, and finally acceptance after minor revisions, with a total duration of over 4 months. Finally, a big weight has been lifted.

Alex_aldrin 2021-12-24

Submitted for over two months, still in the hands of the editor. Urged twice, finally sent out. The external review came back with two major revision suggestions, but the editor rejected it. Too slow. Qufu.

qiuu 2021-11-29

Submitted in early July, received review comments from three reviewers after 5 weeks. Made major revisions (I agreed with the comments given), with a deadline of 1 month. Managed to meet the deadline. Received second round of review comments after 7 weeks, minor revisions were requested, with a deadline of 2 weeks. Submitted the revised manuscript 1 day later. Accepted 3 weeks later (under review for 2 weeks). The whole process took approximately 4 and a half months. A good journal.

苍狼BH.. 2021-10-12

5.31 submission. On 9.1, received reviewer comments, which required major revisions. Fortunately, the additional experimental data requested had already been completed before the submission, so they were directly added as supplementary materials. Some parts of the experiments were rewritten and the discussion was revised within 3 weeks. In early October, minor revisions were requested by the reviewer, focusing on detail modifications. After making the revisions, the paper was accepted in mid-October. It feels like the journal values logic and research innovation, and the reviewer was quite strict. However, getting a publication during my student days is considered quite fortunate.

卢思敏LSM 2021-03-25

Hello! I have been submitting contributions for 3 months, but I don't know why I can't even check the submission information now. Could you please guide me?

Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript

Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.

Search

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started