Verified Reviews - Journal of Mountain Science
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

三三三三三三 2023-07-12

March 10, 2023, submission.
June 2, 2023, major revision.
July 5, 2023, minor revision.
July 8, 2023, minor revision.
July 10, 2023, acceptance.
The submission experience was very good, and the teachers at the editorial department were very patient, tirelessly guiding me through multiple revisions. The requirements for figures and tables were high and very rigorous.

你好123 2023-05-13

The paper was initially accepted for publication by the reviewers of Landslides, but after being rejected by the editors, it was submitted to JMS and accepted after two major revisions. The journal is decent, but improvements are desired. The progress is a bit slow, as it was submitted in October of year 22 and accepted in March.

franthy 2023-04-20

7.26 Modify according to pre-publishing requirements (references, figures, and table formats) and send to email jms@imde.ac.cn.
8.3 Received an email requesting further revisions, revised on 8.5.
9.4 Editor-in-chief requested further modifications to the abstract and figures/tables, revised on the same day.
10.14 Publication layout sample, publication fee of 6000.
10.16 Final layout sample.
10.26 Publishing.
11.7 Indexing.

倔强的瓜牛 2023-03-14

Do you still need to pay for publication fees if this journal is not chosen for development and publication?

倔强的瓜牛 2023-03-14

Does this journal require a publication fee?

HNGUOQIIANG 2022-12-31

I am also in the second review, it has been over a month. Still waiting for the reviewer's evaluation. It has been reviewed twice, hoping for some good news!

HNGUOQIIANG 2022-10-21

I have been waiting for over 4 months for the result of my first trial, but it is still under review. I will continue to wait!

华强的朋友,虎哥的兄弟 2022-08-01

Bro, how long after you accept will you be proofreading?

nyman1000 2022-07-29

It has been over two months since submission, and it is still "Awaiting EEIC Check".

franthy 2022-07-25

3.26 Submitted
4.17 Revised format, resubmitted
5.16 Major revision
6.8 Revised
6.27 Minor revision
7.3 Revised
7.25 Accepted

DaydayBird 2022-04-23

It should be that the number of contributors has increased. Six months ago, one could edit and confirm the submission within 7 days, and submit or not for review. Mountain engineering-related articles can be submitted. Now, when resubmitting, it takes almost one and a half months for an editor to process it, resulting in direct rejection.
3.5 Submit
3.9 Awaiting SE Assignment ADM: Zhang, Jade
3.29 Awaiting EEIC Check
4.22 Rejected.

liugaqiang 2021-08-24

I am anxiously waiting for a decision.

平/ 2021-07-13

2020-12-10 submit
2021-03-21 major revise
2021-04-27 submit
2021-05-31 accept

Translation:
2020-12-10: Submit
2021-03-21: Major revise
2021-04-27: Submit
2021-05-31: Accept

拿国奖的男人 2021-07-08

Mar-9-2021 Submission
Apr-1-2021 Format was incorrect, returned for revision
May-3-2021 Sent for external review
Jun-21-2021 Waiting for a decision from EEIC
Jul-8-2021 Rejected
Although it was a good journal, they rejected my submission. However, they provided feedback from the external review in the email, pointed out my mistakes, and suggested another journal for me to submit after making the necessary revisions. Each stage took about a month, from submission to rejection, totaling 5 months. This information is provided for reference.

forestry 2021-07-04

What happened? Xiao Xiu's submission was rejected.

where 2021-06-30

2020-10-3 Submission
2020-1-19 Under review
2021-3-25 Major revision
2021-5-22 Minor revision
2021-6-30 Rejection
The journal has a moderate speed, typically taking 6-8 months in general. The reviewers have high requirements, and the journal expects high quality and innovation in the articles. The articles need to undergo innovative verification, and there is a risk of rejection at each stage. If there is no hurry and the article has innovation, you can give it a try.

Gerald 2021-06-09

Received: 08-May-2020
Revised: 18-Aug-2020
Accepted: 08-Dec-2020
I communicated with the editor entirely in Chinese, and it was surprising to have a QQ group for submission. I am very happy about it.
I felt that the requirements for the images were a bit high, and it took many revisions before it was finally published.

atomicdog 2021-02-13

Update on Case 3:
Third submission: submitted on October 20, 2020
Major revision: December 21, 2020
Awaiting reviewer scores: January 6, 2021
Accepted: February 7, 2021

atomicdog 2021-01-31

The journal is on an upward trend, and the editors in the editorial department are patient and highly skilled. The journal has high requirements for the language and visual aspects of the articles. Here are the timelines for three submissions to the journal:

First submission: Submitted (25-Oct-2014), Major Revision (24-Dec-2014), Minor Revision (20-Mar-2015), Minor Revision (08-Apr-2015), Accept (20-Apr-2015)

Second submission: Submitted (15-Mar-2016), Major Revision (22-Jun-2016), Minor Revision (21-Nov-2016), Accept (28-Dec-2016)

Third submission: Submitted (20-Oct-2020), Major Revision (21-Dec-2020), Awaiting Reviewer Scores (6-Jan-2021)

...I will continue to update after acceptance.

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More