Verified Reviews - ACS Nano
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

道克特尔刘 2023-07-23

2023.5.13 Submitted
2023.5.14 With Editor (Editor-in-Chief Prof. Xiaodong Chen)
2023.5.19 Assigned to Associate Editor Raymond E. Schaak
2023.5.24 In Peer Review
2023.6.20 Major Revisions
2023.7.21 Accepted for Publication
Five reviewers provided feedback, some of which were good and some were not. Overall, the process went smoothly.

中科大小布 2023-07-20

Can you send the review meeting email? And how long does it usually take for the associate editor to submit for review?

中科大小布 2023-07-20

Could you please send the review meeting by email?

bluesyu 2023-07-15

2023.4.01 submitted
2023.4.06 in peer review
2023.4.20 major revision
2023.6.20 revision submitted
2023.7.15 minor revision
2023.7.27 submitted/in peer review
2023.7.29 accept pending formatting revision
2023.7.31 submitted/in peer review
2023.8.01 accept pending formatting revision (found some formatting errors again - -!)
2023.8.02 accept

可乐25 2023-07-12

How long does Dean Ho's trial take? It's been a month and I still haven't received any response.

带带大师兄1 2023-06-28

6.28 accept can be translated to "accept 6.28" in English.

科大孙笑川 2023-06-27

5.28 revision submitted (5.28 revised version submitted)
6.13 Three reviewers passed, but one had one comment.
6.15 revision submitted (6.15 revised version submitted)
6.16 in peer review (under peer review)
6.21 The editor raised two formatting issues.
6.22 revision submitted (6.22 revised version submitted)
6.25 accept pending formatting revision
6.27 revision submitted (6.27 revised version submitted)
Regarding the publishing system, this is only for reference.
Later submissions for revision will be under peer review, which may not necessarily be sent for review, but still under the editor's consideration, so there is no need to worry excessively.
Also, the status title is "minor revision," but it is mentioned as "minor/major revision decision" below, which mainly depends on the length of the given modification time.

seekyu 2023-06-18

2023.6.16 Published
2022.11.15 Submitted——2023.6.16 Published
Successfully overcome the tribulation after 7 months and 213 days.

seekyu 2023-06-18

2023.6.15 proof submitted.

Jake123 2023-06-16

2023.5.24 Submission
2023.5.31 Deputy Editor Assigned: Ilja K. Voets
2023.6.13 Email sent to inform that it has been sent for review
However, until today (6.16), the ACS Publishing Center still shows "associate editor assigned". It seems that this system is not updating in a timely manner.
Waiting for the review result.

seekyu 2023-06-14

2023.6.14 Journal Publishing Agreement signed

Translation: The Journal Publishing Agreement was signed on June 14, 2023.

seekyu 2023-06-13

2023.6.13 Accepted translates to "Accepted on June 13, 2023."

有光 2023-06-13

6.11, revised.
6.13, pre-acceptance, requires native language polishing.

seekyu 2023-06-13

2023.6.12 revision submitted translates to "Revision submitted on June 12, 2023" in English.

seekyu 2023-06-12

2023.6.9: Accept the pending formatting revision.

手工宽粉加个蛋 2023-06-09

2.21 Submit, arrange deputy editor in the afternoon
2.24 Send for review, in peer review
3.28 One major revision and one minor revision
5.8 Revise
6.7 Accept pending formatting revision

The reviewer's comments were fair and friendly, and each round of peer review took about a month. It went relatively smoothly, and I'm happy!

jadeney 2023-06-09

Basically accepted, Accept Pending Formatting Revision for ACS Nano has been revised twice, both times very quickly. I hope there will be no further formatting revisions.

seekyu 2023-06-07

2023.6.7 No progress. Article status under review / in peer review.

cc-thri 2023-06-04

4.8-5.5. Almost 1 month. Minor repairs usually have no problem. Congratulations.

jadeney 2023-06-03

I am also one of the two small repairers. It has been a week since the second review, and there is no news at all. I don't know how long I have to wait.

jadeney 2023-06-03

How many days after the minor revisions were received? We returned over a week ago and it is still in peer review. Why are these two minor revisions taking so long?

有光 2023-06-02

A work on device fabrication, which has experienced ups and downs, finally sees the light of day. Here, I would like to share my submission experience.

I submitted to EES, but it was not sent for review. The editor asked me to submit to JMCA and promised to send it for review, but I did not agree.

I submitted to AFM, underwent major revisions, minor revisions, and ultimately rejection. The editor rejected my submission.

I did not submit to Small.

I submitted to ACS Nano.
- On January 22nd, I submitted my paper and the next day it was assigned an editor and sent for external review.
- On February 7th, I received two rounds of minor revisions, one round of major revisions, and ultimately rejection. The editor requested major revisions and gave me two months' time. However, I had to request a one-month extension due to writing a funding application.
- On May 7th, I submitted the revised manuscript.
- On May 31st, I received minor revisions and was given one month to complete them.

小白就是我 2023-05-31

Hello friend, it has been 1 month and 4 days on my side, and there has been no news from you.

小白就是我 2023-05-31

Hello friend, may I ask how many days it takes for you to allocate editing and send it for review? It has been one month and 4 days here, and I have not received any news.

科研哼哼 2023-05-31

Friend upstairs, I don't know how to reply to your comment below, so I can only reply like this in hopes that you can see it. The first trial took one month and three days, and the second trial took one month and ten days.

细胞外囊泡 2023-05-30

Is Small really that powerful? Isn't it called the garbage collection station of Wiley? It's similar to how ASC AMI is called the recycling station of ACS.

小白就是我 2023-05-29

CRPS is just average, it doesn't feel as impressive as NC and SA. I'm worried that it might become a tool for making money.

zzyh307 2023-05-29

2023.05.16 Submitted
2023.05.17 Assigned to Editor: Dr. Ilja Voets
2023.05.29 In Peer Review
2023.06.28 Minor revisions, accepted. The editor gave one month to make modifications.
2023.07.20 Revised (the next day the system showed it was in peer review)

光头大魔王 2023-05-24

Similar to you, Matter transfers CRPS for free, AM transfers to A Elect M. How is the prospect of CRPS? The current instant IF is 8.5, is it worth investing?

小白就是我 2023-05-23

Submitted on 4/27, previously submitted to Joule and AEM. The former requested a transfer to CRPS, and the latter requested a transfer to Small. After discussing with my advisor, I will try submitting to ACS Nano (I have submitted a few times before, but I don't have much hope).

On 4/28, I sent an email to allocate associate editors.

In between, I waited intermittently for 14 days (it was so agonizing!).

On 5/11, I sent an email in the evening to notify that it was sent for review, which means it met the requirements.

As of 5/23, it is still under review. I hope to receive the revision information soon.

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started