Verified Reviews - JOURNAL OF MAGNETISM AND MAGNETIC MATERIALS
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

科研小白 2023-04-20

Please advise on how to avoid Chinese editors. I seek guidance.

纽哈 2023-03-13

Do not ever hire Chinese editors. Firstly, they are extremely slow and completely ignore your articles. Secondly, they don't even bother to read the content and simply skim through the ending to reject your submission, recommending an article that is completely unrelated. Definitely avoid choosing Chinese editors.

will@gf 2023-02-27

How to write the reference format for the manual?

交大德布劳内 2023-01-10

2022.10.25 Submission
2022.12.01 Major revision
2022.12.22 Revised
2023.01.09 Accepted

zui清风 2022-10-10

More than a week has passed and it is still being edited in hand.

科研的笨鸟 2022-08-15

2022.5.10 submission
2022.6.02 under review until now

dreamint 2022-02-12

The editor is very responsible, and the review process is fast.
There are two reviewers, one of whom is very responsible and raised many questions. After submission, a minor issue was raised during the second review, but it was quickly addressed after submitting a response. Thank you to the reviewers and the editor.

sharkfish 2022-01-21

Submitted on August 18, 2021
Received major revision comments on October 6, 2021
Supplemented experiments and tests on December 4, 2021, and returned for major revisions
Received minor revision comments on December 31, 2021
Returned after minor revisions on January 16, 2022
Notification of acceptance on January 21, 2022
Both reviewers raised very professional and in-depth questions, which, although painful during the revision process, indeed helped improve the paper.

嘀哩哩哒哒 2021-12-31

May I ask everyone, the submission status is currently under review, and the starting time changes every one or two days. What could be the reason for this?

简简单单 2021-12-28

This is an established journal, how can it be downgraded to the fourth tier?

飞翔的声音 2021-11-22

Two reviewers, very professional, accepted after a major revision, totaling 4 months.
Jul 25, 2021 - Submitted to journal
Oct 16, 2021 - Major revision
Oct 30, 2021 - With Editor
Nov 03, 2021 - Under Review
Nov 11, 2021 - Accept

长风 2021-10-29

April 19, 2021 - Submitted
August 5, 2021 - Review comments
September 18, 2021 - Submitted revised manuscript
October 9, 2021 - Accepted
October 19, 2021 - Available online

初学者 2021-07-17

May I ask how long it usually takes with the editor? It has been almost a week and it is still "with".

Runnable 2021-04-20

The review process is quite fast. The editor is also very patient.

Xiaopao Chen 2021-04-17

The article was reviewed very quickly, and the reviewer's comments were returned in about three weeks. The editor requested major revisions, and after careful modification, the article was accepted directly. The return of the reviewer's comments was also astonishingly fast. It was my first submission, and I was lucky to receive such a quick response. The process was difficult, but the outcome is very satisfying. I would like to thank the editor, Marcelo Knobel.

Received: 1.24
Decision: 2.19
Revised: 3.25
Accepted: 3.30
Online: 4.8

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started