Angelate 2023-07-27

Editing and processing the document was very fast.
Submitted on May 10th.
The editor on May 23rd said the format was incorrect because the journal follows a double-blind review process. At that time, I did not pay attention to this matter and made the necessary format changes and submitted it again on the same day.
Sent for review on May 30th.
Review comments were returned on June 14th, with nine reviewers and over 40 comments, and two weeks were given to address them. Fortunately, the reviewers overall recognized the work. Due to the number of issues, I requested an extension from the editor and submitted the revised comments on July 2nd.
Received further revision comments on July 11th, with one reviewer being particularly meticulous.
Then, on July 15th, the revised comments were submitted again.
The editor didn't take any action during this time and it was under review again on the 23rd.
The review was completed on the 24th and acceptance was confirmed on the 25th.
Overall, the process was quite fast, within the normal two-month timeframe.

吉拉嘎嘎 2023-07-04

There may be some issues with your format. Please make the necessary changes and resubmit it.

keyand 2023-07-03

Hello, I would like to inquire about what it means when the journal submission page shows "sent back to author." It has been a month since the submission, and it has remained in this status. Additionally, only the corresponding author's account displays the status, while the first author's account does not show any submission information.

wqhh57 2023-06-20

Hello, I would like to ask, after I submit my submission, can only the corresponding author see the status of the submission? Will I not be able to see it on my end?

科研小陈努力 2023-02-13

That means the editor did not submit it for review. You don't have to worry about it at the editor's side. Just wait, it will be submitted for review later.

zms821 2023-02-11

Hello, may I ask if your article has been reviewed after you returned it for revision on January 13th? Mine was uploaded as a revised version on February 5th and it is currently still "with editor". I have no idea about the situation.

zms821 2023-02-11

May I ask if your article has been reviewed after being repaired on January 13th? I uploaded the revised draft on February 5th, and it is currently "with editor". I don't know the current status.

科研小陈努力 2023-02-10

There have been no more similar articles submitted after this one. This journal focuses on manuscripts related to food methods and chemical compositions. Apart from a few first-tier journals, I feel that this journal is considered second-tier. The speed is fast, with the chief editor processing manuscripts around 5 am every night, making me check its status every time I wake up in the middle of the night. Interestingly, after the first revision, it was desk-rejected. Then, it was either waiting for acceptance or rejection, but on the third day, it directly changed to "with Editor." After searching for a while, I thought that the opinions of the two reviewers who requested revisions were opposite, with one rejecting and one accepting, so it might continue under review. However, after a few days, it was accepted, and I was very happy. I will continue to submit similar articles in the future. By the way, this journal follows a double-blind review process, which is fair. When submitting, authors need to separately upload a document.

科研小陈努力 2023-02-10

Submitted to the magazine on December 10, 2022, with a major revision due on January 1st. Given 20 days, the paper was revised on the 13th before the New Year and accepted on February 75th. This journal focuses on the chemical composition of food. The article on non-targeted metabolomics has not been reviewed before. The editor said, "All of your identifications are tentative, and data are not quantitative. For papers to be considered by the Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, confirmation of identifications with reference compounds is essential, particularly for compounds that are discussed within the text. Food Chemistry: Molecular Sciences publishes papers featuring the type of analysis featured in your paper."

猪猪 2023-01-12

The translation of the text "速度很快" into English is "Speed is fast."

2022.9.30 submission
2022.10.04 with editor
2022.10.05 under review
2022.11.02 required reviews completed
2022.11.05 major revision
2022.11.16 revise submission
2022.11.17 under review
2022.12.05 required reviews completed-- accept

2022.9.30 submission
2022.10.04 with editor
2022.10.05 under review
2022.11.02 required reviews completed
2022.11.05 major revision
2022.11.16 revise submission
2022.11.17 under review
2022.12.05 required reviews completed-- accept

JOY-Li 2022-11-27

This magazine has a relatively fast overall speed, taking two months from submission to being online.

2022.9.19 Submit
2022.10.14 Major Revision
2022.11.11 Minor Revision
2022.11.16 Accept
2022.11.21 Online

酱酱123 2022-09-21

Returned review comments on August 4th, due to the delay caused by the pandemic. Replied to the review comments on September 18th and accepted on September 20th. Great! Hoping for a higher score for the journal, let's go for it!

pingya 2022-08-23

Has your review comments been returned?

酱酱123 2022-08-04

2022.7.13 Submission
2022.7.18 Under review
2022.8.4 Required Reviews Completed
Future updates, hoping for an opportunity.

咿呀咿呦 2021-12-12

2021.06.04 Submission
2021.06.09 Under review
2021.10.17 Major revision
2021.10.31 Submission of revised version
2021.11.01 Under review
2021.12.07 Accepted
The editing process was fast, although it was a bit challenging to find reviewers at first. Fortunately, it got accepted. All the waiting was worth it. I wish everyone who is preparing to submit or currently submitting good luck and success!

西北老王 2021-12-01

2021.07.01 Submitted
2021.07.10 Editing and review
2021.07.15 Some data does not meet requirements, but overall article quality is acceptable. Willing to delete and resubmit for review.
2021.07.16 Deleted data and resubmitted
2021.07.20 Under review
2021.11.09 Received major revisions. Revised 35 pages, 5000 words.
2021.11.26 Completed major revisions
2021.11.29 Accepted directly
2021.12.1 Published online
Overall review process was slow, so for those in a rush to graduate, be cautious when submitting. However, the editing efficiency was excellent. As long as you seriously address the reviewer's comments, the editor will accept it directly. My first SCI paper in life, although the review period was long and frustrating, the outcome is good!

wondring 2021-11-15

Mar 23, 2021, submit to journal
Mar 28, with editor, under review
May 20, under review
May 31, required reviewers completed (RRC)
Jun 4, 9, 11, 19, 20, 23, RRC
July 20, major revision
Aug 17, with editor (R1)
Aug 22, under review
Aug 24, 27, 28, RRC
Sep 28, under review, RRC
Oct 8, minor revision
Oct 12, with editor (R2)
Oct 16, under review
Oct 25, RRC, accept
Oct 28, online.

First time submitting to this journal, there were 10 reviewers, received an 18-page response, waited for 7 months, luckily it was accepted. However, some articles from our institute get accepted in three months, so the time frame is purely luck-based. Overall, I feel that this journal has good quality, with an impact factor of 4.5 and a ranking of 30, just below LWT. The number of articles in recent years has also increased, and personally, I think it has great potential.

西北小枸杞 2021-10-26

What is your major? How pitiful.

西北小枸杞 2021-10-26

How long does it take to accept after submitting the minor repairs?

想要脱离科研的苦行僧 2021-08-10

Feb 10 - submit manuscript
Feb 14 - under review
Apr 24 - major revision (requested to return revised manuscript before May 23, 3 reviewers, questions are professional but not difficult to answer)
May 31 - Revised manuscript (due to another paper revision, the time is delayed by one week)
June 28 - accept
Jul 6 - publish

wondring 2021-03-29

Translated text: 2021.3.23 submitted to journal
2021.3.28 with editor
2021.3.28 under review
Looking forward to the outcome, it is rumored that this journal is slow, so I don't know what will happen.

匿名而已 2021-01-21

Submitted for review on August 17, 2020. Major revisions were received on October 13, 2020. Due to an extended graduation period, the time for revisions was delayed. Revised manuscript was returned on December 14, 2020. Minor revisions were received on January 15, 2021. Returned on January 20, 2021. Accepted on January 21, 2021. Currently awaiting proofreading. There are a total of two reviewers, and they place great emphasis on experimental methods.