Schagerl 2023-07-31

2023 June minor revision
2023 July 28 re-submit
2023 July 30 accept

Schagerl 2023-07-31

I'm sorry, but "sadasdasdasdasd" does not seem to be a word or phrase in any known language. Can you please provide a different text for translation?

MGYBY 2023-07-14

Sharing the progress of two articles published in JFM:

First article:
2021-5-31: Submitted to JFM Rapids.
2021-6-26: Major revision, recommended to submit to regular JFM.
2021-8-31: Major revision.
2021-11-5: Accepted.

Second article:
2022-8-10: Submitted to JFM.
2022-9-25: Major revision.
2022-11-11: Major revision.
2023-1-1: Major revision.
2023-3-17: Minor revision.
2023-5-17: Minor revision.
2023-7-7: Minor revision.
2023-7-13: Accepted.

Overall, each time there was at least one extremely diligent and rigorous reviewer, who could not tolerate any flaws.

Schagerl 2023-04-28

2022 September投
2023 February received the first trial results: two minor revisions and one major revision.
2023 April submitted the revised version to the editor.

逆境无赖兔 2023-04-17

May I ask what is the difference between JFM rapids and JFM, and what is their relationship?

Dudupup 2023-02-23

The first review took a little over a month, with a total of three reviewers, and required major revisions. The reviewers were very professional and rigorous, providing many targeted comments and suggestions that greatly helped improve the quality of the article.
After the first review, we were given two months to make the revisions, and we completed them about ten days ahead of schedule. The second review took about one and a half months (with high efficiency in the review process). Only one reviewer had some suggestions regarding the expression. After submitting the modifications, it took two days to be accepted.
From submission to acceptance, it took approximately four months.

wanggy 2023-01-20

What direction is "大佬" in? Congratulations.

随欲 2023-01-15

First trial took 4 months with three reviewers, two positive and one negative, requiring major revisions.
Given three months to make the revisions, an extension of 1.5 months (equivalent to 4.5 months total) was requested for re-submission.
The second trial took 2.5 months with three positive reviews and was accepted.

BOBOBOBOBO 2022-12-16

JFM Rapids is indeed fast, with feedback on the review provided within one month. There were three reviewers and a 14-day period given for revisions. After resubmission, the acceptance was received within three days. As a fluid person, it is truly exciting to be able to publish on JFM.

RCWE_ZYF 2022-09-15

There is a "Submit Your Article" option below the homepage search bar.

爱学习的东东 2022-09-07

Hello, I have clicked on this point to apply for an account. Where can I submit my contribution? I couldn't find it.

maomao 2022-08-02

First review lasted for over 3 months, with two major revisions and one rejection. The editor thought the innovation was good and provided an opportunity for modification. After adding a significant amount of content, it was changed from rapid to regular review. After two rounds of minor revisions, it was finally accepted. The overall improvement was significant, as the journal is very rigorous and has high requirements. Thanks to the reviewers and editors!

随欲 2022-07-03

First trial, four months, two positives and one negative, not sure if it can succeed or not.

须眉绛凯 2022-06-16

What journal is JFM? Which one deserves your article, bro? I think it's suitable for submission to the Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics. Only this one can barely match your article. JFM is too exclusive, they don't appreciate good articles at all. Keep it up, submit to ARFM! Go for it.

hahaSIAM_MZ 2022-03-10

But where did JFM go after its decline? Physics Review Fluids? Definitely not POF... or maybe PRE?

Bolanster 2022-03-09

Submitted at the end of October 2021, received review comments on November 20th, and the first review took 27 days!! Can't believe it.
There were four reviewers in the first review, two minor revisions and two rejections. The reviewers who rejected it should be industry experts, mainly because the theoretical analysis was not thorough enough.
Spent two months on major revisions, racked my brain for theories, and finally transformed completely.
The second review only took two weeks, and all four reviewers accepted it. In total, it took more than five months from start to finish.
If the experiment, numerical simulation, and theoretical model analysis and prediction are all good, it is relatively easy to get accepted.
Thumbs up to the speed and editors of the journal. As long as you focus on revising well, it will greatly improve your work.

小李bb 2021-12-28

Hello, are you Mr. Zhong from Huazhong University of Science and Technology? I have read two of your papers, may I ask you a question?

洞悉 2021-11-23

1st review: Over four months - major revision
Returned after 2 months of revision
2nd review: Over two months - minor revisions & pre-employment recording
Formally hired after 2 weeks

After two years of work, nearly one year of repeated modifications and iterations before submission, and further repeated modifications and iterations during the submission process, I finally convinced the reviewers. The reviewers were very professional, meticulous, careful, and responsible. Going through such an academic exercise, even if not successful, greatly enhances one's academic level.

offshore 2021-11-22

It is a reliable journal. The first review took three months and was returned on time. It required major revisions and provided professional and targeted comments. After careful revisions for four months, it was resubmitted. The second review took two months and required minor revisions. Many professional comments were still provided and changes were necessary. It was difficult to make some of the changes and it felt on the verge of collapse, but a patient and careful response was still provided. After the revision was submitted, it was accepted.

The first time submitting to JFM, I truly felt the rigor of the journal. There were countless times when I wanted to give up, but I held on. I don't know if it's a tight-knit community, but taking the feedback seriously can still be helpful for personal growth.

The article started with 19 pages in the initial submission, then increased to 27 pages in the second submission, and eventually reached 30 pages in the third submission. I still can't believe that I was able to produce this work. If given the opportunity, I would still choose JFM. It has greatly contributed to my improvement. Finally, after two years of work, it has come to an end~

HC 2021-11-12

The circle is quite serious. If no one from the research team has published in this journal before, it is basically difficult to get accepted. The editors do not consider the research direction of the paper much, and only assign it to acquaintances they know for peer review.

987654321 2021-08-27

District three, not top? Bachelor's coffin can't be held down anymore.

Kang123 2021-07-04

As the top journal in fluid mechanics, it is enough to demonstrate the author's comprehensive quality. It is a journal that strictly adheres to tradition and maintains a high level of quality. Three years of day and night work, and it takes a year to accept the review. Truly understanding the difficulty and hardship involved.

Phantomzhong 2021-04-08

At the beginning of December, after a week, I submitted paper1 and paper2 (as the second author) to JFM Rapid.
In mid-January, I received a response for paper1 with two positive feedbacks and a suggestion for direct acceptance. However, all three reviewers suggested expanding the details. Therefore, after minor revisions, I resubmitted it to the regular journal at the end of February and received acceptance by the end of March.
For paper2, I received a response in early March with three positive feedbacks. After minor revisions, I submitted it on March 15th and it was accepted on March 31st.

offshore 2021-03-18

On December 15th, the submission directly showed "under review," but the status has remained unchanged since then.
On March 14th, feedback for revision was received, exactly three months later. It gave a punctual feeling.
The article is about interface instability issues. It was the first time submitting to JFM, and nobody was familiar. The editor-in-chief chose Juniper.

lfy1995 2021-03-18

Does anyone who is familiar with it know approximately how long it takes for the submission to be reviewed? After submitting on March 3, 2021, it went directly under review, but I don't know exactly what stage it is at.

offshore 2021-03-10

Posted on December 15, 20, it directly shows "under review". It has been almost 3 months till today, and it's still like this...

Phantomzhong 2021-02-06

I recently submitted two articles. I submitted one on December 5th, and I received a response on January 10th. For the second article, I submitted it on December 10th, but I haven't received any news yet. It seems like they have too many submissions = =

BSXJJ 2021-02-03

Submitted on December 22nd, 2020, it has been a month and a half and still no news. Has it already been sent for review? I'm also afraid to send an email to the editor.

BSXJJ 2021-01-16

When there is news, let's inform each other...