Verified Reviews - Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

材料学子0827 2022-11-11

Friend, what was the outcome in the end?

Zebra 2022-10-09

Why are there only 5 comments when directly searching for the Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry on letpub? Many comment information cannot be seen. Only after finding the previous link can more comments be seen.

材料学子0827 2022-08-21

2022.7.25 Major revision

2022.7.25 denotes the date of a major revision.

材料学子0827 2022-08-21

Overall, the submission process was fast. The first review took 17 days, and the second review took less than 7 days. Each time, the submission was with the editor on the same day and under review the next day. The first review required major revisions, with two reviewers raising a total of 13 questions. Some questions were difficult to answer, and additional experiments were requested, which took 20 days to complete. In general, the reviewers were fair and the editor was efficient. However, I spent more than ten days working on the major revisions, with a ten-day gap in between where no work was done. If there could be some improvement in the speed, it would be even faster. Finally, I would like to thank the reviewers for their accurate feedback, as well as Professor Xia from Nanjing University and Professor Marcin Opallo from Poland.

材料学子0827 2022-08-21

2022.7.4 Submit to the journal
2022.7.5 With editor
2022.7.7 Under review
2022.7.24 Required reviews completed
2022.8.12 Revision submitted to journal
2022.8.13 With editor
2022.8.14 Under review
2022.8.20 Required reviews completed
2022.8.20 Completed - Accept

材料学子0827 2022-08-15

After replying, will it be directly accepted? Is there a review process?

是瓜皮瑞瑞呀 2022-08-07

May 06, 2022 Submission to journal
May 12, 2022 With Editor
May 14, 2022 Under Review
Jun 07, 2022 Required Reviews Completed
Jun 29, 2022 Major revision
Jul 10, 2022 Revision Submitted to Journal
Jul 12, 2022 With Editor
Jul 18, 2022 Under Review
Aug 03, 2022 Accept

Approximately three months or so, with one major revision in between. Thank you to the editor and two reviewers!

生命不息 科研不止 2022-08-01

External audit will take about a month.

ZhouEtin 2022-06-08

Hello, may I ask if it is necessary for all authors to click on the link to confirm before submitting to the journal? Why did it take two days to submit to the journal and yet we still kept receiving email reminders for each author to confirm?

ZhouEtin 2022-06-08

Hello, may I ask if all authors must click on the link to confirm before submitting to the journal? Why did it take two days to submit to the journal and yet the email reminders for authors to confirm continued?

ZhouEtin 2022-06-08

Why did it take two days to submit to the journal and why are you constantly sending emails to remind each author to confirm? Is it necessary for all authors to click on the link and confirm before submitting to the journal?

双一流冲一波 2022-01-22

How long did you use for the external audit? How many times did the Under Review time change?

生命不息 科研不止 2022-01-21

First time selecting and submitting, I was very fortunate to be accepted. The journal is very reputable and the editorial staff is very friendly. Additionally, both reviewers are very professional in the field of electrocatalysis, with a focus on theoretical and mechanistic research. After major revisions, I finally received good news. However, the journal's review process is not very fast, and I hope that it will continue to improve!

双一流冲一波 2022-01-11

I am in the same situation as you. May I ask what happened in the end?

echo1994wf 2021-12-17

Received at Editorial Office
9 Sep 2021
Article revised
10 Dec 2021
Article accepted for publication
13 Dec 2021

A hydrology article was submitted here. The reviewers were particularly professional, but the process was somewhat slow.

waterray 2021-11-30

July 12th submission
Received reviewer comments on September 3rd, major revisions
Revised on October 9th
Received acceptance email on November 30th
Although the review process was slower than expected, it went smoothly. Thanks to Xinghua Xia for editing.

泽铭sama 2021-10-05

8.22 Submission
9.13 Minor Revision
10.1 Return of Manuscript
10.5 Accepted!

INNER-PEACE 2021-08-14

7.23投的 - Submitted on July 23rd
8.11拒稿 - Rejected on August 11th

Zebra 2021-04-02

Rejected by SNB and made changes to resubmit
Submitted on February 28th
Received minor revisions on March 25th
Returned on March 30th
Accepted on April 2nd
Thank you, Editor-in-Chief Xinghua Xia!

Zebra 2021-04-02

The current impact factor is 3.8, right?

baobao-xiaowang 2021-01-14

The current latest impact factor has reached 4.2, hoping for continuous improvement.

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started