Verified Reviews - JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

PatrickPei 2023-06-27

Share the timeline of the recent submission to JAM manuscript, for reference only.
12/09/22 Submission
04/20/23 Minor revision
05/15/23 Major revision
06/14/23 Acceptance
06/22/23 Online publication
It took 6 and a half months, with a moderate processing speed, and the reviewers' comments were quite professional.

ToBo 2023-05-19

Excuse me, OP, how long does it take for the first review to come back? It has been three months for me and I still haven't received any news. Does this mean my article is not good?

publish or perish 2023-04-23

Received! It was quite a journey, not easy at all.

彩青 2023-01-10

Hello, I would like to ask if this magazine charges for OA after accepting submissions. If so, how much is the fee? Thank you very much.

彩青 2023-01-10

Hello, I would like to ask if there is still a fee for submitting without selecting OA? If there is a fee, how much is it? Thank you very much.

self-help 2023-01-07

23.1.7 accepted translates to "23rd January 7th accepted" in English.

self-help 2023-01-01

12.22 Minor repair
12.27 Return for repair
12.29 under review

wei11 2022-12-17

2022. 7.13 Submission
2022. 10.25 Resubmitted after modification
2022. 11.26 Minor revision
2022.12.8 Accepted

publish or perish 2022-11-03

Both rounds of review resulted in rejection and resubmission because the reviewers kept asking questions persistently. The review comments and handling results will be sent to each author. Emphasis is placed on practical application.

self-help 2022-10-19

Submitted on 10.9, the editor still hasn't processed it until now! The speed is incredibly slow!

辉煌 2022-06-24

Submission experience:
Submitted on 18th March 2022.
Received reviewer comments on 5th May 2022, minor revisions required (1-month revision period).
Revised on 3rd June 2022.
Accepted on 20th June 2022.
Overall, the editor was very nice, and the reviewer's comments were quite fair.
Before submitting the manuscript, I carefully checked the language, and the editor did not suggest any language modifications, so the process was relatively quick (3 months).

1234512 2022-04-21

22. On March 8th, there was a re-submission, with a minor revision in between, and now it has been accepted.

jingyuhui 2022-02-03

8.8 Submission
9.26 Return, minor revision
10.3 Submit revised draft, 10.31 Return, another minor revision
11.6 Submit revised draft again, 12.27 Return, another minor revision
12.28 Submit revised draft again, 1.10 Finally accepted
The process from submission to acceptance took 5 months.

hang 2021-12-02

9.17 Submission
9.25 Returned after editing, added Author contributions and immediately resubmitted
10.14 Under Review
12.1 Rejected and resubmitted, one reviewer rejected and one minor revision
Will provide feedback after resubmission hhhhhhh

逐风风 2021-10-17

The initial review took seven months, and the comments from the two reviewers were very good. However, the editor provided a lot of suggestions to reject and resubmit the manuscript, and after making the revisions and resubmitting, it was directly rejected. The initial review was too lengthy, so if there is no urgency, you can give it a try.

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started