BIOLE 2023-08-09

Submitted on January 4th, rejection with resubmission opportunity given on May 26th; resubmitted directly to the originally assigned editor on June 28th; minor revisions requested on July 27th, resubmitted on August 3rd; accepted on August 7th. Thank you to Associate Editor Prof. Holger Zorn and thank you to JAFC!

Cyril_Tse 2023-08-09

2023.05.02 submitted
2023.05.04 under review
2023.06.26 major revision
2023.07.01 revision submitted
2023.07.10 minor revision
2023.07.13 revision submitted
2023.08.01 accepted
Thank you to Associate Editor Prof. Karin Birte Svensson from the Technical University of Denmark.

love-yan 2023-08-08

Have you received any news about your current situation? How long does it usually take to receive feedback?

caddy 2023-07-27

Posted on 7.27, the result is unknown.

wzhang 2023-07-24

How long will it take to receive news after the major repairs are completed? May I ask everyone?

love-yan 2023-07-20

Have you received any news about your current situation? How long does it take to get feedback?

love-yan 2023-07-20

Have you received any news? I submitted it on May 7th and it is still under review.

Boom-61 2023-07-18

Hello, did you find three new reviewers after the major revision?

Marco617 2023-07-17

The major revision was returned in 25 days and received comments from three reviewers. The first two reviewers accepted it directly, but the third reviewer still required major revisions and requested two additional experiments to be conducted.

董明然 2023-07-06

Hello, may I ask if you can share the requirements for submitting articles to the journal? My email is dongmingran1998@163.com. Thank you very much.

张小飞 2023-07-05

After 10 days of submission, the associate editor is still evaluating the status. What's going on?

张小飞 2023-07-05

Submission for 10 days and still in the evaluation phase with the Associate Editor assigned.

缺月疏桐 2023-07-05

Reflection: Pay attention to details. The editing is updated approximately every two weeks, with high efficiency. Some reviewers are unreasonable and directly quote SCI articles in their responses, which are also accepted and adopted. This may be the case for accepting articles in 3-6 months. Comparing with FC, I really don't want to say much. I submitted an article analyzing the workload of FC+ to JSS, but they didn't even bother to look at it and said my workload was not enough to submit to FC. I wonder if they wasted their time reading over 20 FC articles or if the editor simply came to a conclusion with closed eyes. The review process for FC is at least 6-18 months, truly dedicated to impact factor.

缺月疏桐 2023-07-05

The second article is about the anti-pinworm infection of plants in the Zanthoxylum genus. It involves in vivo and in vitro activity evaluation, LCMSMS analysis of active components' mass spectrometry characteristics, the correlation of activity contribution, targeted detection of isomers and their metabolites (involving the development of new methods). Overall, it has significant highlights in terms of tracing the basis of active substances, analysis and detection, and the development of anti-pinworm functions in 10 species of Zanthoxylum plants. Submitted on December 20, 2022, it went under review three days later. On January 20, 2023, it was majorly revised and resubmitted on February 14, 2023, immediately going under review again. On March 1, 2023, minor revisions were made, and two days later, I resubmitted it. It was accepted on March 7, 2023. During the journal typesetting on March 14, 2023, the editor made detailed revisions to grammar, format, and details, which made me particularly touched! They were so responsible.

缺月疏桐 2023-07-05

2020.11.24 Submitted to Journal.
2020.12.01 Incomplete submission, format does not meet journal requirements. Editorial assistant directly rejected and attached various journal requirements documents, very detailed and attentive. Made the necessary changes accordingly.
2020.12.30 Submitted to Journal, no need for resubmission, but need to provide a detailed description of the reasons for the previous rejection and the revised appendix.
2021.01.07 With editor.
2021.01.14 Under review.
2021.01.28 Review completed.
2021.02.06 Under review. I have five reviewers, expecting significant differences in opinion, so the editor conducted a detailed review.
2021.02.10 Major revision. Truly, there are five reviewers with over 100 comments. Made detailed modifications accordingly (PS: improved the article during the Spring Festival, resulting in better outcomes).
2021.02.20 Sent back for revision, directly back to "Under review".
2021.03.04 Minor revision.
2021.03.10 Modified and resubmitted.
2021.04.06 Accepted.

缺月疏桐 2023-07-05

Unconsciously, I have already written two articles on JAFC about anti-infection. This journal is truly a classic and well-established one. Let me share the process of submitting the articles.

娃哈哈123 2023-06-29

How are you doing now? Mine has also been handed over to the deputy editor and there has been no progress. I'm very worried.

BIOLE 2023-06-29

On the 4th of January, the submission was made, and on the 26th of May, it was rejected with an opportunity for resubmission. On the 28th of June, the resubmission was directly assigned to the original editor.

chi31 2023-06-28

2023.4.18 submit
2023.4.20 assigned to editor
2023.4.22 in peer review
2023.5.16 minor revisions (3 reviewers)
2023.5.30 resubmit
2023.6.15 accept
ACS journals are much faster compared to others.

djukpui 2023-06-27

Still waiting.

呵呵嘛哩哄 2023-06-26

I will only be back in one and a half months.

Marco617 2023-06-26

Return for major repairs, it has been 12 days, I don't know approximately how long it will take to get the results.

Marco617 2023-06-24

I want to know that it has been more than 10 days since the agricultural chemical major was submitted for revision. How long will it take to receive feedback? How can I check the status? It seems that once the article is submitted through the submission system, it will be "under review", and then I will receive an email from the assigned editor. After that, there is no further update, and during this period, the status will not change. I don't know if it has been sent for review.

Cyril_Tse 2023-06-23

2023.5.2 Submitted
2023.5.4 In Peer Review
A month and a half has passed, and it is currently in the peer review stage.

BIOLE 2023-06-19

Submitted on January 4th, received feedback on May 26th, is it considered a rejection? However, the editor gave an opportunity to resubmit.

酒醉的蝴蝶 2023-06-19

Brothers, how long does it take to receive the proof after submission? Will there be an email notification or do we need to log in to the submission system to check?

jiayou 2023-06-16

My (person/thing) still hasn't come back, it has been 50 days.

春哥123 2023-06-15

666, my second opinion has come back, and it's also almost positive. Wishing you good luck.

Acousma 2023-06-15

2023.2.8 Submit
2023.2.9 Assigned to editor
2023.2.10 In peer review
2023.4.13 Reject & Resubmit (3 reviewers with over 20 comments, requesting additional experiments, emphasizing innovation)
2023.5.12 Resubmit (added one experiment, made revisions as requested, provided explanations)
2023.5.12 Assigned to editor and In peer review (sent for review on the same day)
2023.6.9 Accept pending minor revisions (2 reviewers, one accepted, one had no comments)
2023.6.12 Resubmit
2023.6.14 Accept

wzhang 2023-06-15

Submitted over 30 days ago, received major revisions in the first review.