taibudong 2023-06-26

20220412 Submission,
20220413 Under review,
20220630 Notice of major revisions, given 45 days, opinions from 3 reviewers, professional opinions, favorable evaluation of the initial draft
20220813 Return of major revisions
20220923 Second round of reviews received, given 15 days, opinions from 3 reviewers, few issues
20221005 Return of second revisions
20221124 Official website status shows "accept as is," then according to email requirements, modify the formatting and submit a final draft on the website along with relevant materials.
20221213 Editor sends email officially notifying acceptance,
During the Production phase, the author needs to check the website daily to view the status of the paper and assist in making necessary revisions. Prompt replies are required.
Overall, the process from submission to finding reviewers was completed in 2 days, which is very fast. If the revision process is even faster, the overall time can be shortened. The opinions of the reviewers were very reasonable and helpful in improving the paper. The process took 8 months in the field of aerospace, which cannot be considered slow but also not fast compared to 5 to 6 months in the field of robotics and automation control.
I am preparing to submit to this journal again in the future.

taibudong 2023-06-26

20220412 Submission
20220413 Under review
20220630 Notification of major revisions, given 45 days, 3 reviewers' comments, comments are professional, overall positive evaluation of the initial draft
20220813 Major revisions returned
20220923 Second round of reviewer comments received, given 15 days, few issues mentioned
20221005 Second revisions returned
20221124 Official website status shows "accept as is," then according to email requirements, modify the format and submit a final draft and relevant materials on the website.
20221213 Later, the editor sends an email formally notifying acceptance.
Later, in the production stage, the author needs to log in to the official website every day to check the status of the paper. You will be asked to assist in modifying the journal's proofreading, and timely responses are necessary until the galley proofs are sent for your confirmation.
Overall, the process from submission to finding reviewers was completed in 2 days, which is very fast. If the return for revisions is faster, the overall time can be shortened. The reviewers' comments were very helpful in improving the paper. The entire process in the aerospace field took 8 months, which cannot be considered slow, but compared to the 5 to 6 months in the robotics field for classmates, it is not fast.
I am planning to submit to this journal again in the future.

wyccbit 2023-06-03

Hello, when I was returning the item for repair, the system kept saying that the file I uploaded was not in accordance with the guide. However, the guide on the official website is written very vaguely. I would like to ask for your advice. Sorry for the trouble.

magic98 2023-04-23

Here is the translation of the text into English:

"Here comes another water thesis."
09/14/2022 New Submission Sent to Journal Office
01/04/2023 Decision - Revise for Re-Review
01/07/2023 Revised Submission Sent to Journal
04/20/2023 Decision - Accept As Is

wrc 2023-04-06

At that time, the second trial lasted about three months and has now been hired.

于小七 2023-03-13

I have been waiting for the second review for 12 months now, and it is said that they cannot find the previous reviewer.

2022_haha 2023-03-12

May I ask how long it took for the final review to be accepted? Thank you for providing the information. My second review has been under review for over two months.

老木头 2022-11-09

Received the first round of comments after one month of submission, made minor revisions and directly accepted.

xxdzs 2022-10-30

The review speed of this journal is very slow. It is suggested not to rush to submit for publication. I don't know if the article needs to be related to civil engineering transplantation applications, otherwise it may be rejected. The journal is very old-fashioned and traditional, and the editors are very responsible. Other impressions are good. It took about twenty days for the editor to reject the submission and reply that it does not align with the direction of civil engineering applications.

于小七 2022-10-24

I have been waiting for the second trial for 8 months.

wrc 2022-10-19

How long does the second trial usually take?

wrc 2022-10-19

The first trial has been going on for 4 months, and the second trial has been going on for 2 months without any result.

于小七 2022-09-14

Submit for review every four months, after revising in February, till now, there has been one reviewer who keeps delaying and not providing feedback. What should I do... What should I do...

过毛情人节啊 2022-08-02

Was it rejected because the editor felt that there was no innovation point?

ChuckyZhang 2021-12-09

submitted on 2021.7 - Submitted on July 2021
revised on 2021.10 - Revised on October 2021
approved on 2021.12 - Approved on December 2021

zzypeter 2021-12-06

The actual first trial period is 2-3 weeks.

Seven 2021-10-18

09/27/2021 Decision - Accept (Final)
09/10/2021 Revised Submission Sent to Journal
08/02/2021 Decision - Revise for Re-Review
01/19/2021 Submit

XHXXS 2021-07-08

I would like to ask, is JAE an online tool for generating PDF documents from LaTeX and submitting them directly?

XHXXS 2021-07-08

I would like to ask if there are any requirements for the format when submitting a contribution, and if there is a Word template available.

kanghh 2021-05-08

I hope it gets better and better. The editing process is quite fast, but the review cycle is slow.