Verified Reviews - IONICS
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

chenyoki 2022-01-24

12.7 Submission, and after submission it immediately became "under review".
12.30 Received reviewers' comments, three reviewers, minor revisions. At one point, it changed from "under review" to "awaiting EIC consideration" and then changed back to "under review", probably because the opinions of two reviewers were not enough, so another reviewer was sought.
1.18 Submitted revisions.
1.20 Accepted.

It only took a little over a month from the initial submission to acceptance, although some time was delayed due to my vacation at home. Otherwise, it could have been controlled within a month.

Both the editor and the reviewers were very diligent and responsible. Thumbs up!

陆有文 2022-01-14

Submitted in mid-September; received notice of major revisions in late November, spent nearly two months redoing experiments and making modifications. After the revisions were made, it was accepted within a week.

帅啊哈哈 2021-11-12

Why did this journal go under review the day after submission? Does this mean it has already been sent for review, or what?

GJLSCUER 2021-11-11

Just submitted and it already shows "under review" for over two months. After two months, received a letter stating that the review has not started yet. Another month has passed and still no news. The status has now changed to "waiting decision." It's incredibly slow!!!

柚末 2021-10-28

Hello, may I ask if Ionics journal has any word count requirements? Are there any templates available?

6423542 2021-10-25

Bro, have you been finally hired?

Tinahhh 2021-09-18

After being rejected by another journal, I made some changes and submitted to this journal after a month. The editor was very responsible, and the review process was fast. I submitted on July 22nd, received minor revisions on August 25th, made the revisions and resubmitted on September 14th, and it was accepted on September 17th. The efficiency was particularly high. I hope your journal continues to improve!

BOSH 2021-08-23

The reviewing process is fast, and the editors are very responsible. I hope your journal will continue to improve!

luckyyyy 2021-04-06

May I ask where did you vote later on?

咩鹿酱 2021-03-23

The submission made on February 27 was directly rejected on March 22, stating that it does not meet the requirements of the journal.

OKL 2021-02-20

Nearly half a year, it should be a long time for this journal, right (laughing and crying), but the final result of acceptance is good.
July 28, 2020: Submission.
October 13, 2020: First major revision, took about two and a half months for peer review. Although affected by the pandemic, others were relatively faster.
December 4, 2020: Second major revision, took about one and a half months.
January 14, 2021: Third minor revision, a little over a month.
January 17, 2021: Review process completed, preparing for acceptance.
February 2021: Online.

SFG 2021-02-12

The speed is fast, and the result will be given within a week. There are three reviewers, who provided major revisions and gave a few months for the deadline. After supplementing experimental data, the result was given within a week and accepted. However, the publication information was not immediately provided, and it is unknown when it will be published.

YoushouldK 2021-01-25

May I ask where to check the deadline?

1166562 2021-01-08

May I ask, bro, what is the reason for your situation? Did you figure it out later?

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now