何弃疗啊哥 2023-07-22

Yes, they were all handled on the same day.

安达绝能 2023-07-21

Are you sure it's this Blaji?... This person is extremely slow.

必accept 2023-07-21

2023. 5. 29 Submission
2023. 7. 3 Minor revision suggestions
2023. 7. 12 Reply to suggestions
2023. 7. 14 Under review

何弃疗啊哥 2023-07-17

2023.4.29 Submission
2023.6.03 Major revision
2023.6.21 Rework
2023.7.17 Accepted
C Balaji edits and handles emails very quickly. Love it, love it.

猪头猪脑 2023-07-01

2023.6.27, the editor did not wait for the second reviewer's opinion and directly accepted it. It took one year and one month.

猪头猪脑 2023-03-13

The first review took 5 months and it has been under review continuously. I definitely need to push for it. I received the comments from the first review after more than four months and submitted the second review on November 22nd. Until now, there are no results yet. The original second reviewer has been delaying the review for a month and a half, and the editor is not pushing either. Sigh, I won't submit to this journal for a second time.

猪头猪脑 2023-03-13

This comment has been deleted!

yyds0910 2023-03-13

Hello, on my first day of submission, the date remained unchanged after being "Under Review" the next day. It has been five months already. Should I send an email to the editor to inquire about the situation? Has the manuscript not been assigned to a reviewer yet?

孙悟空丶zzzz 2023-03-12

Submit first draft: 2022.12.18
Submit for review: 2022.12.19
Major revision: 2023.2.6
Revise: 2023.2.19
Accept: 2023.3.11

Komi 2023-03-06

Editor Cathy CASTELAIN

Komi 2023-03-06

2022.10.5 Submission
2023.2.1 Minor revisions, two reviewers
2023.2.5 Revised
2023.3.3 Accepted
Hope THESCI keeps getting better.

猪头猪脑 2023-03-05

2022 5.22 with editor
2022 6.1 under review
2022 10.3 major revision - Two reviewers provided professional feedback, and two months were given for revisions.
2022 11.22 submit 1st revise
2022 11.26 under review (Reviewer 1 accepted the review)
2022 11.29 Reviewer 1 completed the review
2023 1.31 Reviewer 2 accepted the review
Until now, Reviewer 2 still hasn't completed the review... I don't understand why. It has been over a month already.
The journal's quality is good, currently ranked in the second zone of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. The invited reviewers possess the ability to review and provide professional feedback.
However, the speed is too slow. The first review took over four months, and it has been over three months since the second review with no news. I am eager to graduate, so I need to carefully consider where to submit. The editor is Cathy Castelain.

Iris Zhang 2023-02-27

2019.1.2-Submitted
2019.9.7-Accepted

天坑·、硕 2023-02-01

You see, my other answer, the one I submitted to ICHMT, has been six months already. Submitting to these two journals is simply a great injustice. I am anxious every day.

猪头猪脑 2023-01-31

This journal is really slow. I submitted at the end of May and it took 4 months for the first review. The comments didn't come back until early October, requiring major revisions. The revised manuscript was sent back in early November and it has been over two months since it's been under review since November 22nd, and the status hasn't changed. It's really difficult. The editor is Cathy Castelain.

天坑·、硕 2023-01-27

My editor is C Balaji, and I have been working with him for three months under the guidance of senior brother Gross.

上头了 2023-01-03

Posted on May 6, 2022, and reviewed the next day.
Received the first round of comments on October 18, 2022, with two reviewers - one rejection and one major revision. The editor opted for the major revision, which took two months to complete.
Received the revised manuscript around December 10, 2022, and it was accepted on January 3.
The editor, Cathy CASTELAIN, is quite good, and the processing speed was very fast.
The first review took 5 months, and there was one reminder during the process. The editorial department responded that it was difficult to find reviewers.

liyiqiao 2022-11-15

What is the current situation right now?

liumaodegangbeng 2022-10-31

May I ask who your editor is?

tiankengshuo 2022-09-19

Is the decision made to edit directly? Envious.

tiankengshuo 2022-09-19

2022.4 submission, approximately one month to return, major revisions
Reviewer 1's evaluation is acceptable, innovative. Reviewer 2's evaluation is very negative, suggesting rejection.
Spent two months for revisions.
Returned by the end of July, minor revisions upon return in September, fixing grammar issues and some minor language problems.
Took about a day to fix and return.
Why is it being reviewed again? I saw that previous seniors were directly accepted. Feeling anxious.

流动换热 2022-09-05

Which editor should I choose to handle it, and the speed will be faster?

天坑·、硕 2022-08-04

The speed of review and the relationship with the responsible editor are closely related. The opinions of the reviewers are very helpful for the article, and the review process is also very fast.
Submitted on November 17, 2021
With editor on November 19, 2021
Under review on December 23, 2021
Revised and resubmitted on January 27, 2022
Major revision on February 14, 2022
Returned for major revision on April 15, 2022
With editor on April 17, 2022
Under review on June 25, 2022
Revised and resubmitted on July 14, 2022
Accepted on July 22, 2022

上头了 2022-07-23

Under the status of "under review," it has changed four times, and it is still "under review" now. What's the situation? Are there at least four reviewers?

西方番茄 2022-05-05

Submitted in late November, with a small revision and a major revision in January. The final version was submitted in February. The reviewer agreed to accept the small revision in March, while the other reviewer requested a major revision, which was completed and submitted within a week. Acceptance was notified in early May.

There were two major revisions, which resulted in significant changes. The total word count of the article increased from 5000 to nearly 9000, particularly after the second major revision. It was mentally overwhelming, but at least the final outcome was good. This is my second first-authored SCI paper.

Overall, it took 5 and a half months, which is considered fast.

Wonecake 2022-04-08

It has been over five months since the submission, with two reviewers. One of them never provided any comments, and the first reviewer still hasn't responded.

迷途中的小博 2022-02-15

I submitted an article, the first draft was not very good, and the editor-in-chief gave me the opportunity for major revisions. The reviewer's comments were very helpful, and the quality of the article improved significantly after the revisions. It has been online for over three months.

倚风听雨 2022-01-04

Posted on August 15, 2021, entered the review process for about a week, received major revision comments on November 15th, from two reviewers, with a total of more than 20 comments. After careful revision, it was resubmitted two weeks later. Received minor revision comments on December 27th, presumably from the same reviewer. One of the reviewers had already agreed to accept, while the other reviewer provided two additional comments. After making simple modifications, it was resubmitted the next day and accepted the same evening.

zzzwwbbk 2021-12-28

Who is your editor, may I ask?

小东西 2021-12-16

Submission on May 7th,
Major revision on May 30th,
One month for revision and polishing,
Resubmission on June 28th,
Acceptance on August 2nd.