司马特 2023-07-20

The first review takes three months, the second review takes six months of major revisions, and the third review takes half a year before being accepted. Adding the time for revisions, it takes a year and a half in total. Why am I so slow? When submitting, I was in the top position in zone 2, but in the end, it became zone 3. What a loss.

Muser 2023-07-17

Old control journal, good reputation, it's a pity that the impact factor has dropped.
The review speed is really mysterious. The papers I submitted took 3-8 months for each round of review. My reviewers were able to submit their comments within a month for each round. I am grateful for such excellent reviewers!
Although the impact factor has decreased, it is still prestigious to publish work in this journal. Currently, I still recommend it. I hope everyone's submissions go smoothly.

燕燕 2023-06-30

May I ask what is the weight requirement for this journal?

一定要中呀啊啊 2023-06-09

Can I ask if the new submission system now only sends emails to the corresponding author after submission? Or do they wait until the editor is assigned before sending emails? After I submitted my manuscript, it only showed "submitted" and I haven't received any email. What could be the reason?

一定要中呀啊啊 2023-06-09

Do you know if the new submission system only sends emails to the corresponding author after submission? Or does it wait until the editors have been assigned before sending emails? After I submitted my manuscript, it only showed "submitted" but I did not receive any email. What could be the reason for this?

猫无忌 2023-02-17

Other people submit to this journal quite quickly, but I have a slow reviewer, which results in each evaluation recommendation taking quite a long time. Timeline:
2022.4.27 submitted
2022.9.07 major revision
2022.9.25 revised manuscript submitted
2022.11.18 minor revision
2022.12.12 revised manuscript submitted
2022.1.30 accepted

暮烟水 2022-12-26

It's raining heavily, what should I do?

a1425508580 2022-12-19

2022.5.20 submitted
2022.7.04 major revision
2022. 8.25 resubmitted
2022.12.17 accept

Translation:
2022.5.20 - Submitted
2022.7.04 - Major revision
2022.8.25 - Resubmitted
2022.12.17 - Accepted

i6277 2022-12-07

Cool, 8 months. The journal focuses more on theory, and papers related to applications are not well-received.

XCPAN 2022-12-06

2022.4.1 initial submission
2022.5.29 major revision
2022.9.1 under revision(1)
2022.11.1 minor revision
2022.11.6 under revision(2)
2022.12.6 accepted

First and second review both took exactly two months, while the third review took exactly one month. It feels like the editor is timing everything.

猫无忌 2022-11-29

It means that the minimum number of opinions that can make a decision is recycled, but there are still opinions that haven't come back. Generally, there are three reviewers, and if two opinions come back, it is considered an evaluating recommendation. Usually, a decision will only be made after the third reviewer's opinion is received.

i6277 2022-11-20

What is the situation when "under review" and "Evaluating Recommendation" appear at the same time? Does anyone know?

lfj0101 2022-11-11

Boss, my situation is similar to yours. I wanted to ask if you have any target journals lately? Tragically, I'm going bald.

小木木啊 2022-11-08

5.22-7.3 First review, rejected and resubmitted
7.3-8.25 Revised and resubmitted
8.25-11.7 Second review, rejected
For the second review, the associate editor was changed and 5 additional reviewers were added, which is equivalent to resubmitting the manuscript. There were many suggestions, although the reviewers did not recommend rejection, the editor rejected it. In hindsight, even if the article had no major issues, having multiple reviewer comments can still provide reasons for rejection.

等待 2022-10-31

Submission Process:
2022.3.21 Submitted
2022.7.18 Major Revision
2022.8.7 Resubmitted
2022.10.31 Accept

lfj0101 2022-10-31

Hello, I would like to ask how long it took for the review after your paper was rejected and resubmitted? How were the review comments?

小木木啊 2022-10-27

What is the mechanism for resubmitting a rejected manuscript? Will a new reviewer be assigned? After I resubmit a rejected manuscript, why does the review process take longer than the initial review?

i6277 2022-10-17

The journal is very good. After submitting, it has been more than six months and it is still under review. I have sent three reminders, but there is no response. Why is it so slow?

小木木啊 2022-09-29

How long did it take for you to review after rejecting and resubmitting?

i6277 2022-09-14

It has been 5 months since the manuscript submission, quite slow. It has been under review all this time. After chasing for an update, they said they have received one reviewer's comments and are still awaiting the second reviewer.

猫无忌 2022-09-03

May I ask how long you have been waiting in total? I have been in the "under review" and "evaluating recommendation" status for 45 days now.

猫无忌 2022-08-28

April 27th submitted
April 30th under review
July 20th under review and evaluating recommendation

猫无忌 2022-08-28

Too slow. Evaluating the recommendation has been going on for almost 40 days now, and there has been no sign of progress.

希望好事发生 2022-08-22

Hello, may I ask how long does it take for the second review results to be released if the ADM has not been assigned? It has been a month since I passed, should I remind them?

方旭 2022-08-22

Control the direction of the old brand journal, with a reputation second only to top-tier journals. After being rejected by general AUTO or TAC, consideration will be given to re-submitting here.

SummerCastle 2022-08-04

Got two papers accepted and reviewed one. In the field of control, its quality and reputation are second only to top journals. However, the difficulty is lower compared to IJC (although the ranking is higher). The first paper went through the review process and was accepted in about five months from submission. The second paper went through three or four rounds of review, taking about a year and a half. Therefore, the review cycle varies greatly, but on average, it takes about a year. There is no assigned Associate Editor in the system, but it doesn't have much impact as it still goes through external review. In my second paper, the second round of revisions was in this situation.

I have reviewed a paper, which was an academic achievement by a Japanese scholar. I provided a major comment, stating that there wasn't much difference in terms of innovation compared to the author's previous paper, and I hoped the author could explain it (I gave it a major revision). I could see two other reviewers, one recommended minor revisions or acceptance (I can't remember exactly), and the other also provided some comments and gave a major revision. However, the editor-in-chief directly rejected the paper. So, the editor-in-chief's level is quite decisive. There are several reviewers in this situation. But I became a reviewer only after one of my papers was accepted. Unlike another journal, which I won't mention (whether it's in the SCI second or first zone), they have invited me to review five or six papers even though my paper is still under review. It feels a bit hasty.

Overall, the IJRNC journal has good recognition, the submission time varies, averaging about a year, but it can be shorter or longer. The review process is quite formal, and the editors are very good.

i6277 2022-07-20

The journal's reputation is decent, but the speed is a bit slow. It took more than three months to push for the manuscript, and only received one reviewer's comments. It is currently being sent to the second reviewer, which is quite slow.

大队长0041 2022-06-27

Official website contact information for the managing editor:
Mike J. Grimble
Industrial Control Centre
Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering
University of Strathclyde
Royal College Building
204 George Street
Glasgow, G1 1XW, UK
Email: m.j.grimble@strath.ac.uk

I am really frustrated. After receiving the acceptance email one week ago, I submitted the final version in the system. However, I received the comments from the last reviewer and was asked to make changes again... Luckily, it's not a major issue. I guess the reviewer might have forgotten, and the editor didn't remind them.

i6277 2022-06-23

The speed of the author's review is so fast. It has been almost 3 months for me, and I haven't received any updates.

yaoyaozi 2022-06-20

How should I say it? I am very grateful to IJRNC. It may be a bit slow, but the feedback is all very good. I have grown a lot after all, since I come from a mathematical background. I have figured everything out on my own, and I have been very lucky. I hope to continue to work hard.