Verified Reviews - INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

MTsRS 2023-08-08

Every time you revise, you need to delete the original file and submit a new version; the system can only have one version of the file at a time.

最初の 2023-08-07

7.25 Major Revision.

hjjjj1235 2023-08-01

7.31 Major Maintenance Return Repair

hjjjj1235 2023-07-31

Okay, thank you, thank you, thank you, teacher. May I ask if you need to delete the original first draft and upload the modified version during the process of resubmission, or should I keep the first draft and submit the modified version? ???

MTsRS 2023-07-23

Sorry, I used Word, so I may not be able to help you. But during my submission process, it seems that there was no requirement for editing this "click to return" thing, maybe it can be ignored.

hjjjj1235 2023-07-22

Hello teacher, I would like to ask what typesetting software you use in your laboratory. When I generate a PDF using LaTeX, I am unable to click on the year in the reference section to return to the main text. It is frustrating.

hjjjj1235 2023-07-22

Hello teacher, I would like to ask what typesetting you use in your laboratory. When I generate a PDF using LaTeX, clicking on the year in the reference section does not lead back to the main text. It's really frustrating.

MTsRS 2023-07-21

2.23 Submission
2.28 Assignment Editing
4.22 Major Overhaul
5.27 Rework
6.26 Minor Repair
6.28 Rework
7.17 Acceptance
The speed is acceptable, there are two reviewers, and their opinions are very fair. Highly recommended.

Sephiroth 2023-07-13

2023.3.16 submit 投稿 - Submitted on March 16, 2023
2023.5.14 reject & resubmit - Rejected and resubmitted on May 14, 2023
2023.6.25 再投稿 - Resubmitted on June 25, 2023
2023.7.7 accept 接收 - Accepted on July 7, 2023

1059 2023-07-12

International Remote Sensing Journal has a relatively high rate of rejection in the first round among journals of the same level. Additionally, the editor is highly responsible and the reviewers' suggestions greatly enhance the quality of the articles. Looking back at the first version of the manuscript, it is indeed abysmal. The submission dates are as follows: 0228 Submit, 0425 Reject & Resubmit, 0522 Resubmit, 0618 Major Revision, 0625 Resubmit, 0712 Accept.

zhaozhaohaihai 2023-07-11

2023.06.13 Minor repair and return
2023.07.07 Reception

hjjjj1235 2023-07-10

7.10 refers to a specific date, which is October 7th. "大修" in English can be translated as "major overhaul" or "extensive renovation".

youth 2023-07-05

Do we need a journal solely dedicated to artificial intelligence that is not related to remote sensing?

hjjjj1235 2023-06-30

6.9 Submission
6.23 Referees Reviewing Paper

GIS_RS2022 2023-06-15

May I ask if there is any result? How many reviewers?

zhaozhaohaihai 2023-06-06

2023.05.11 Under review
2023.06.05 Received review comments

zhaozhaohaihai 2023-06-06

2023.05.10 Major repairs have been returned for further repairs.

茶小乖 2023-06-04

Posted on 5.31, still no news.

最初の 2023-06-03

5.2 Submission
It has been a month and we are still looking for reviewers...

hejiachen 2023-05-22

5.22 Referees' Reports Received

兰亭序 2023-05-19

You are really fast!

困昆 2023-05-18

Very scared from October 5th to October 16th.

困昆 2023-05-18

3.10 Submit manuscript
3.10-3.17 Determine assistant editor and editor
3.17-4.29 Find reviewers + reviewers review
4.29-5.10 Minor revisions and submission
5.10-5.16 Again search for reviewers
5.17 Accept

hejiachen 2023-05-15

The reviewer reviews the paper 5.9.

hejiachen 2023-05-09

5.9 The reviewer reviews the paper.

hejiachen 2023-04-23

4.12 awaiting admin processing - This means that the item or request is currently waiting for administrative processing to be completed.

4.23 Admin Processing Completed - This indicates that the administrative processing for the item or request has been completed.

ctcv 2023-04-21

I think it might be because the reviewer's response was quite negative, so the editor chose to send it for review again with a different reviewer.
I originally had two reviewers, but the editor also provided quite a lot of revision comments, so it is considered as having three reviewers.

ctcv 2023-04-21

4.17 Minor revision, one reviewer agrees to accept, while the other reviewer has a minor question, which has been answered without the need for additional experiments.
4.20 Revision required.
4.21 Accepted.

爱吃炸酱面的晗 2023-04-21

May I ask how many reviewers' comments you have received?

爱吃炸酱面的晗 2023-04-21

Dude, after editing and receiving the reviewer's comments, I became the reviewer again. What is going on?

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started