芒顿小镇 2023-08-09

It has been two weeks since the second review was required to be completed, but there is still no news!

finging 2023-08-09

Translation: "Is it still normal to be with the editor on August 9th? It has been 20 days, and during this period, the date was updated once."

IMax-My 2023-08-08

23-7-24 submission, with editor two days later
23-7-31 decision in process, it has been ongoing for 9 days

洋芋豆 2023-08-08

I see that many people either do minor repairs or major repairs after RRC (Rail Replacement Service). It is very rare to encounter a dip.

洋芋豆 2023-08-08

Hey guys, does the appearance of a DIP mean that I'm really going to be rejected?
June 28th: Submitted
June 29th: With editor
July 4th: With editor
July 5th: Under review
August 3rd: Required reviews completed
August 6th: Decision in process

Peanuts 2023-08-07

Just got rejected in the first trial, and then they asked me to make modifications and resubmit.

BIO-123 2023-08-06

I would like to ask, in the reviewer's comment, "Note: In order to effectively convey your recommendations for improvement to the author(s), and help editors make well-informed and efficient decisions, we ask you to answer the following specific questions about the manuscript and provide additional suggestions where appropriate." There are a total of 9 questions below, and most of the questions have not been objected by the reviewer. When replying to the reviewer's comments, is it possible to delete the questions that the reviewer did not object to and only keep the questions that require substantive answers?

zzzzer 2023-08-06

Was it rejected in the first review? Re-submitting after rejection belongs to major revisions.

Peanuts 2023-08-06

2023.8.6 The article was rejected. However, the editor asked me to revise the paper according to the reviewer's comments and resubmit it. Does this count as a major revision? ??

little_foo 2023-08-05

Ask customer service directly on the webpage, recommend asking for English customer service, they have all the authority to answer any questions!

0.0-992229 2023-08-05

How do you know how many reviewers there are? Where can you see it?

zzzzer 2023-08-04

After the first review and repair, RRC continued for 1 week and then resubmitted for review again. It should be because the opinions of the two reviewers in the first review were contradictory, so the editor had to find a new reviewer. Have you ever encountered such a situation? What are the subsequent results? I am very anxious!!!

代臣 2023-08-04

My submission has been under review for a month already, and there is no news at all. Is there a problem with the reviewers or the editorial department has not followed up with them?

Drinkstea 2023-08-04

7.20: Submit revised manuscript
7.20: Review with editor
8.4: Still under review with editor

SunZero1 2023-08-03

I feel that after working with the editor, it goes directly into "decision in progress." The manuscript has been put on hold by the editor for a long time. The editor is waiting for a new submission. If the new submission is better, then we will be rejected. If the new submission is not good enough, but still meets the publication's article quota, then it will be sent for review. This is my personal opinion.

zzzzer 2023-08-03

After the first review and revision, RRC was resubmitted for review after 1 week. It seems that there were conflicting opinions from the two reviewers in the first review, so the editor decided to find a new reviewer. Have you ever encountered such a situation? What was the outcome afterwards? I'm very anxious!!!

SunZero1 2023-08-03

Update, I entered "decision in progress" directly after 16 days with editor. Today is the 6th day of being in this state, and I'm really frustrated. Just reject it quickly, I just want it to be over with.

学术之光 2023-08-03

Have you submitted the polysaccharide for review?

Drinkstea 2023-08-03

8.3 Still with editor

Drinkstea 2023-08-03

8.3 Still with editor

木颜尘 2023-08-02

Jul 06, 2023 submit
Jul 08, 2023 With Editor
Jul 13, 2023 Under Review
Aug 02, 2023 Under Review
Why did the status suddenly update after half a month of submission but remain unchanged?

幽汖 2023-08-02

11 May 2023: received at editorial office
16 Jul 2023: article revised
29 July 2023: article accepted for publication

Aerlizhu 2023-08-02

with editor 45 days became dip, dip has been maintained for 6 days, very dragged, wasting time.

duan826 2023-08-02

3.26 submitted to journal
3.28 with editor
4.5 under review
7.22 minor revision (3 reviewers, review took over 3 months. After sending a reminder email, the editor informed that only 1 reviewer provided minor revision comments, and the next day the paper was accepted with minor revisions)
7.28 revision submitted to journal
7.30 accept
7.31 online
Overall, this journal has a high submission volume and accepts many studies related to macromolecules. The editor is very friendly.

快乐的自己 2023-08-01

7.5 Submission
7.7 With editor
7.12 Under review
7.31 Again with editor
Do any of you know what this situation is about?

zzzzer 2023-08-01

Who is your editor? We both seem to be very slow.

Drinkstea 2023-08-01

5.26 submitted to the journal
5.27 with editor
6.6 under review
6.11/6.17 required reviews completed
7.1 major revision
7.20 revision submitted to the journal
7.20 with editor
Still with editor until 8.1
???

Translation:
5.26 - The article was submitted to the journal.
5.27 - It is currently with the editor for review.
6.6 - The article is under review.
6.11/6.17 - All required reviews have been completed.
7.1 - A major revision is needed.
7.20 - The revised version of the article was submitted to the journal.
7.20 - It is currently with the editor for review.
Still with editor until 8.1.
???

一只大狒狒 2023-08-01

Three reviewers, the first one directly rejected but provided seven comments. The editor requested major revisions, which took about three months due to the addition of a dataset.
4.21 submitted
4.22 with editor
5.1 under review
5.14 required reviews completed
5.20 major revision
7.25 accept

珍珠奶茶烤地瓜 2023-08-01

Total time used: 37 days
Adhm was rejected in June
Submitted on June 25th
With editor on June 26th
Under review on July 7th
Reviewer comments on July 15th, July 16th, and July 18th
Major revision required, four reviewers, one had no issues
Revised on July 28th
Reviewer comments on July 29th, July 30th, and July 31st
Accepted on August 1st
Thanks to Jianshu Li, the editor, for fast processing efficiency. Grateful.

伍健 2023-08-01

7.4 submit
7.5 with editor
7.11 under review
7.25 to present required reviews completed