jackni 2023-08-09

April 15 - Submitted
April 17 - With editor
April 22 - Under review
June 10 - Major revision (given 3 weeks)
Requested extension for supplementary experiment, editor extended until July 28
July 26 - Major revision returned to editor
July 27 - With editor
July 29 - Second review
August 7 - Accepted
The journal is quite good, with efficient and responsible editors and reviewers. The article mainly focuses on experiments with some bioinformatics analysis, so the workload cannot be too light. Two reviewers provided comments, with more than 20 points raised. Reviewer 1 was quite strict. However, the author maintained a positive attitude, providing detailed responses to each comment, and soon the article will be accepted.

lin5891 2023-08-01

May I ask if this magazine requires raw data? Does WB require full film?

lin5891 2023-08-01

Excuse me, does this magazine require original data?

AAA110 2023-07-26

How long will it take to be reviewed?

huaxiumeng 2023-06-15

1. Posted on April 14th.
2. Major revisions on May 10th, with two reviewers providing mostly positive feedback; 21 days for the revisions.
3. Revised on May 29th.
4. Accepted on June 14th, overall very fast, and the editor didn't procrastinate either.

Jamie0703 2023-05-13

On May 12th, after a duration of four months, the recruitment process finally concluded.

Jamie0703 2023-05-05

Returned comments on April 22. The reviewer who didn't provide any comments in the first review submitted seven comments. Revised it on May 2, and currently it is still in the "with editor" status. I hate these kinds of reviewers the most, they always prolong the review process unnecessarily. If you can review it, then review it, stop pretending.

Jamie0703 2023-04-19

January 9th: Submitted
January 10th: Under review
March 11th: First review comments received
April 6th: Submitted revised draft
April 18th: Review process complete, currently unsure of feedback
First reviewer provided specific feedback on the article's structure and writing logic, acknowledging its innovative research. Made targeted revisions accordingly. Second reviewer did not provide specific issues, only stating that the language was poor and the design was bad, resulting in rejection. Fortunately, the editor noticed the lack of specific feedback from the second reviewer and did not heavily consider their opinion. The entire manuscript was revised and marked in red. The first reviewer likely returned their comments for revisions the following day, while the second reviewer took over a week, and it is unknown whether they agreed or disagreed.
Hoping for an acceptance and publication soon, as it has been only a few days. Will provide updates if there are any news.

能思考的木头 2023-04-17

It has been many days since the submission, and it has been in the "Decision in Process" status. What could be the reason for this? Is it going to be rejected?

大东 2023-04-17

Submitted on February 20th, reviewed 2 days after submission, revised on March 11th (major revision) with a deadline of 21 days for revisions. The revised manuscript was resubmitted on March 30th and accepted on April 15th after a 2-week review period.

Krystal 2023-04-06

May I ask if this journal is suitable for articles on clinical pharmacokinetics? Is it difficult to revise this submission? The time is limited, and I would like to seek advice from senior researchers.

多米-西雅 2023-03-25

The article is mainly clinical and overall it is relatively smooth.
Submitted on December 5th.
Received major revision on January 6th, given two months of time (two reviewers, one more negative and one positive, each provided several questions for modification, the reviewers' comments were acceptable; the editor's comment was that the language needs polishing). Due to being busy in January, I didn't have time to do the major revision and only started it formally in early February after the Lunar New Year. During this period, I sought help from a company for language polishing.
Received the revised version on February 22nd.
Minor revision on March 8th, as there was unclear indexing on one image.
Second minor revision on March 12th, moving the image to the supplementary materials.
Accepted on March 14th.

pope56 2023-03-01

Posted on November 22nd, returned for repair on February 8th, received on February 28th, giving a thumbs up.

xiaohuan2 2023-02-14

Posted on 2022.12.17, received the reviews on 2023.1.28. Both reviewers recommended minor revisions. Submitted the revised version on 2023.2.8, and it was accepted on 2023.2.14. Fast and efficient!

yezi 2023-02-12

Can you share its review timeline? Thank you.

洪33 2022-12-06

Very nice journal.

投稿路上的凡 2022-11-17

This is going to be cool, so obvious.

echo 2022-11-16

Did you end up including it? How did this magazine start with a decision?

毛衣 2022-08-19

May I ask what does "Decision in Process" mean? After "with editor" it changed to "Decision in Process", does it mean my submission is being rejected? Is this status mentioned in your manuscript?

学术幻想家 2021-12-10

Why take this matter seriously? It's not a problem if different communication methods are used. There's no need to worry about being able to publish 10 articles, it just shows that one author is favored.

Yang.Tianye 2021-12-05

Submitted on September 26th, repaired on November 26th, and accepted on December 2nd!

是小妖yaya 2021-08-10

A very, very nice magazine, highly recommended!!! Submitted on May 4th, 2021, received first-round comments on May 24th, 2021. Both reviewers suggested significant revisions, and their suggestions were excellent. After making the changes, I felt that the article had indeed reached a higher level. Resubmitted on July 17th, 2021, received second-round comments on August 1st, 2021, made minor revisions, resubmitted on August 7th, 2021, and finally accepted on August 9th, 2021! Hahaha, I can finally get my degree~

nnnnnnnnn 2021-02-06

What happened afterwards? My paper has been under review since the first round for almost a month now. During this period, the status has been constantly updated. What does that mean? Does it mean that no reviewers have been found yet?