即墨 2023-08-05

No, it is still under review and has not been completed yet.

kaisahw 2023-08-03

This journal is really trash. With the editor for nearly two months, now under review for almost a month with no reviewers accepting the manuscript, and the editor is no longer inviting more reviewers.

啊雨 2023-08-03

Very slow, and also not moving.

kaisahw 2023-07-29

Either not submitting for review, with the editor taking two months, or submitting for review and none of the eight people receiving the manuscript. It has been another month now. This efficiency is truly speechless.

LISA-田 2023-07-28

Hello, my repetition rate is also too high. I request to reduce it. Can you please provide me with your Taobao plagiarism checking link?

resistance 2023-07-24

I also made revisions and re-submitted. How are you doing now, OP?

13 2023-07-22

I suppose it's a rejection and they are already looking for another place to submit.

kaisahw 2023-07-22

Did you submit it for review? Did you finish reviewing it so quickly?

13 2023-07-22

On July 22nd, I woke up early to have a meeting and found that it had become a DIP (Decision in Process). I guess it's not looking good. If I'm lucky, it might be a major revision, or it could have been rejected. I just don't know how much longer I have to wait.

一头牛 2023-07-17

It has been 7 days since I submitted it for review, and no one has agreed to review it...5555 (a crying emoticon)

即墨 2023-07-17

We both have the same situation. I also found 13% of plagiarism through CK check. The editor told me it was 36%, but later I found a more expensive one on Taobao and reduced it to 14%. I directly sent the screenshot of the report to the editor, and within two days, it was sent for review. The editor is an old professor from Dalian University of Technology, probably one of his students reviewed it. However, I couldn't find the reviewer, so I sent out 16 invitations. Today, I saw that 2 people agreed to review it.

oreki 2023-07-14

Two reviewers, plus the opinions of two editors.

kaisahw 2023-07-14

When you enter with the editor, you will receive an email. By clicking "reply" to the email, you will be able to see the editor's email address. This magazine is so rubbish and it has caused a delay. My colleague's article, which was submitted later than mine, was rejected and resubmitted to a new magazine. Now, we have already received a review comment. Therefore, I will never consider this journal again. It is getting slower and causing delays.

13 2023-07-12

July 12th, still with editor.

13 2023-07-12

How did you find out how to send it to the reviewer in Sweden? I'm looking for an answer, bro.

kaisahw 2023-07-12

No, I was delivered to E. Johansson in Sweden. The speed of the Swedes really leaves one speechless.

LANlan** 2023-07-12

May I ask if your submission has been reviewed? I suspect that we are the same editor.

LANlan** 2023-07-12

Excuse me, have you submitted it for review? I suspect that we are both editors.

chiyujie 2023-07-12

7.11 with editor
7.11 submitted again, what happened? Did the editor reject it?

chiyujie 2023-07-11

7.8 submitted
7.8 with editor
7.8 submitted
Still submitted on the 11th.

科研新手123 2023-07-11

Where did you hear that? Isn't JCR supposed to come out in December?

redaiyulin 2023-07-10

Why has the JCR classification of this journal changed to the second zone?

勇敢牛牛一号 2023-07-10

Several reviewers, huh?

oreki 2023-07-10

Old-established journal with good reputation, selective in article content, particularly inclined towards food and agriculture, instantly rejects others.
1.13.2023: Under editorial review
1.20.2023: Currently being reviewed
6.17.2023: Requires significant revision
7.07.2023: Under editorial review
7.08.2023: Accepted

LANlan** 2023-07-08

My situation is the same. Previously, my submissions were rejected quite quickly, but now I guess the editors are on summer vacation, so I can only wait.

kaisahw 2023-07-08

Sent an email to remind about the manuscript, but it was useless. I sent it through the system and also directly to the responsible editor. No response at all, and it is still "with editor" until now. I feel like this journal is very irresponsible. If they want to reject the submission, they don't need to take one and a half months.

13 2023-07-07

How to politely write a reminder for the manuscript? I remember this journal being quite prompt, but it's been a month with the editor.

13 2023-07-07

July 5th with editor
July 6th with editor
July 7th with editor

This journal used to have a pretty fast response time, usually within a week they would let you know if it's a major revision or rejection. But now it's July and I don't know if they are on vacation or if this journal has become popular and received more submissions, causing the speed to slow down. I can accept that, but I truly hope they don't reject it. Sigh!

bbb 2023-07-06

Excuse me, did the editor send you a plagiarism report? The Chinese editor told me that my similarity rate is too high, but did not provide me with a plagiarism report. However, when I checked it myself using iThenticate CrossCheck, the similarity rate was only 9%.

kaisahw 2023-07-01

Useless, I guess this editor went on vacation.