hahahahah 2023-08-08

2023.4.25 - Submitted
2023.4.45 - Under review

雅各布 2023-06-30

2023.6.23 submit
2023.6.23 ADM Under review;

Translation: On June 23rd, 2023, the submission was made. On June 23rd, 2023, it is currently under review by ADM.

淹死的鱼19 2023-05-17

2022-10-02 Under review
2022-12-31 With Associate Editor
2022-12-31 Minor Revisions Required
2023-01-25 Submit Revision
2023-05-12 With Associate Editor
2023-05-12 Accept

The submission is relevant to the journal's topic, but not in the field of deep learning. The review process is fast, with a response in approximately three months. On the same day of the response, the editor immediately sends an email notification to the author.

bigbigpang 2022-12-30

This reviewer who rejected it did not read it carefully. The questions raised are not related to the content I wrote.

PaperSeeker 2022-12-30

Oh, this is really difficult. But luckily, you came up with the answer quickly, without delaying you.

bigbigpang 2022-12-30

Reject! One major repair, one minor repair, one rejection!

PaperSeeker 2022-12-29

It will be soon. How much longer do you need to wait for the results? Good luck. Waiting for you to share good news.

bigbigpang 2022-12-29

Entered With Associate Editor

PaperSeeker 2022-12-26

Haha, no changes. It's only been three months, I estimate it will still take a long time.

bigbigpang 2022-12-05

Has the original poster got any news?

bigbigpang 2022-11-23

No news is good news.

PaperSeeker 2022-11-22

Hahaha, what are you thinking? This publication is also very slow. Only a small number are fast, either through special circumstances or encountering acquaintances. Anyway, I feel that if mine can be reviewed within six months, I would be grateful.

bigbigpang 2022-11-21

It has been a month since the submission. There has been no news or response.

bigbigpang 2022-11-14

Then yours should be soon, it's almost three months.

风歌人 2022-11-11

Mine is the same. It was submitted on August 29, 2022, and it has been showing "Under review" since then. I still don't know if it has been sent for external review or how long this status will last.

PaperSeeker 2022-11-08

The submission made at the end of September has been under review all this time. This journal seems to be slow. It feels like it is normal for the first round of reviews to take 8 to 9 months. Let's wait patiently.

bigbigpang 2022-11-08

How far along is your manuscript review?

bigbigpang 2022-10-25

According to the schedule provided by the OP, "under review" means that the manuscript has already entered the external review stage. The external review process typically takes about one and a half months, which would be around September 27th. After the external review, the assistant editor will conduct a 10-day review, which will approximately be around October 5th.

风歌人 2022-10-25

Posted on August 29, 2022, after submission, it showed "Under review", and it has remained in this status until now. I don't know if it has been sent for external review, nor do I know how long this status will last.

我是猫 2022-10-25

Under review lasted approximately one and a half months, with associate editor lasting approximately ten days.

我是猫 2022-10-25

Approximately 10 days or so.

bigbigpang 2022-10-24

How long will it approximately take for "under review" to change to "with associate editor"?

我是猫 2022-10-24

Avec l'éditeur associé

bigbigpang 2022-10-23

Hello, may I ask what is the next status after "Under Review"?

PaperSeeker 2022-10-15

There are two lines of ADM? I only have one. Anyway, the submission is under review. I can't tell if it's been sent for approval or not.

宇宙系浪漫 2022-10-08

May I ask what does it mean when the submission system shows one line of "ADM" and two lines of "ADM"?

TroubleMaker 2022-05-26

May I ask how much additional content is needed for the conference paper expansion? Thank you.

wildwater 2022-04-14

December submission. It is advised that everyone should not submit during this time, as it coincides with Western Christmas, New Year, and Chinese Spring Festival. The review process has been significantly extended (and the quality of review is also poor, perhaps due to the holiday season).

I submitted to a federal learning direction and encountered an editor and reviewer who lacked understanding of AI. One reviewer didn't even know what CIFAR10 is... They claimed that I didn't explain what this dataset is in the text. Then, the editor rejected it, stating that the content was not suitable and asked me to submit to another AI journal instead. However, this journal has published numerous papers on federated learning in the past two years, all of which were purely algorithmic and AI-focused. I don't understand it. I can only say that I had bad luck and encountered an editor who doesn't understand AI... I advise future individuals to be cautious. This journal seems a bit unreliable now... The quality of the review is not good.

PaperSeeker 2022-01-06

Did they recently make changes? Now the submission system requires selecting at least one AE, otherwise it cannot be submitted. It's the first time I've encountered a submission system requiring filling in AE.

我是猫 2022-01-04

I remember that I seem to have not chosen AE.