Verified Reviews - IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

囷囷 2023-08-07

The initial draft requires 13 pages, while the revised draft requires 16 pages.

letpubSCU123 2023-08-07

8.7 Still submitted.

How long does it usually take to start the review process?

letpubSCU123 2023-08-07

When revising, will the content be increased according to the reviewer's comments? Generally, the accepted version is longer than the initial draft.

橘子皮的皮 2023-08-07

May I ask you, friends, what is the page limit for submitting articles to TMM journal? Is it limited to a maximum of 13 pages? Why are there published papers with 16 pages then?

橘子皮的皮 2023-08-07

Hello, may I ask if there is a limit of 13 pages for manuscript submission for this journal?

镜湖元 2023-08-04

2022.09 Submission, the initial review comments will be given in 2023.07.
Revisions will be accepted within one month.

letpubSCU123 2023-07-29

The third time submitting to this journal, previously one positive and one negative response, keeping a record of the submissions:

2023.07.29 Submitted (The ID number is close to 18000, intimidating)

letpubSCU123 2023-07-29

Just submitted an article, no experts reviewed it, low-level computer vision issues. Your feedback in this cycle scared me, it's so difficult...

SemiZxf 2023-07-28

Posted in September 2022 until now, it has been less than 11 months, and the first review has not been received! I have sent four reminders during this period, and each time the response was "delay out of control". It is not recommended to submit a paper without an IEEE Fellow or a renowned scholar's endorsement. It is in a low-level field. I am truly devastated.

Boobooboo 2023-07-27

In ten months, I haven't received any feedback. The reviewers and the Associate Editor are extremely irresponsible. I have sent three emails to the AE, but they completely ignored them. I might not be able to graduate...

RICARD 2023-07-21

No, it's directly accepted. However, my senior brother had previously asked for some polishing in an article, and he was the one who did the polishing. Anyway, it will be reimbursed by the boss. If the editor asks for polishing, it's better to get reimbursed by the boss. Usually, the boss won't try to save this money.

green1 2023-07-21

May I ask, for your minor revision, is it necessary to have the revised draft reviewed by the proofreading company for proofreading?

green1 2023-07-21

Currently, the manuscript is in this state, and in the editor's email, it is stated, "Please note that IEEE recommends the American Journal Experts (AJE.com) for professional English editing." However, the reviewer did not point out any language issues. So, is it necessary to have the revised manuscript professionally edited by the language polishing company?

Boobooboo 2023-07-18

It has been over nine months, AE does not reply, and there is no news at all.

囷囷 2023-07-15

Has your second trial had a result? It has been almost a month and a half for mine and still no news.

RICARD 2023-07-05

2022.12.05 Submit
2023.01.09 In peer review
2023.05.08 Major revision
2023.05.15 Submit
2023.06.16 Minor revision
2023.06.19 Submit
2023.07.04 Accept

This article took 7 months to submit to TMM. It was rejected by TPAMI after 6 months and then rejected by TIP after 8 months. I thought it was going to be a waste, but in the end, it got accepted. It's really not easy.

lbj23 2023-07-04

Not recommended to submit. The first review takes more than 7 months, and even if you send emails to urge the AE, they won't pay attention to you. The neighboring TCSVT is generally much faster, and this year CSVT has an impact factor of 8.4, while TMM only has 7.3. Considering all factors, submitting needs to be cautious, as there is a fear of waiting for a year for the first review, only to be rejected.

ROC66666 2023-07-02

When will the second trial result be generally announced? I have been waiting for nearly two months without any outcome.

J 2023-07-02

Hello, I would like to ask how long it took for peer review of your manuscript.

Boobooboo 2023-07-02

Update again, 2023.07.02, it's been nine months already, still in peer review, haven't received any review comments yet, be cautious when submitting!

Pangw 2023-06-30

The reviewing period is considered relatively fast among the journals I submitted to. However, the impact factor decreased slightly when it came out this year.

DogEgg 2023-06-28

The second time, it was the same two reviewers as before. Maybe the associate editor didn't want them at first, so they rejected the paper after inviting only those two reviewers for the second time. Anyway, it felt inexplicable, so I decided to submit it elsewhere.

DogEgg 2023-06-28

The second time, two of the original reviewers were still involved. Maybe the associate editor didn't want them from the beginning, so they rejected the manuscript after inviting only those two reviewers again. Anyway, it felt inexplicable, so the decision was made to submit elsewhere.

fengqh 2023-06-27

Does resubmission of the rejection mean that only two reviewers are assigned? Shouldn't it be the same reviewers as before?

DogEgg 2023-06-27

The first time, there were five reviewers: three major revisions, one minor revision, and one rejection with suggestions for resubmission. In the end, it was rejected by the associate editor. Since the overall opinions of the reviewers were positive, I spent two months making changes and wrote nearly 40 pages of response for resubmission. The second time, both reviewers requested major revisions and asked some detailed questions, but it was still rejected by the associate editor. In both cases, the associate editor focused on a few issues raised by the reviewers, emphasized them again, and then issued a rejection. I will not submit to this journal again in the future. It's frustrating.

GS 2023-06-26

I haven't received any feedback for seven months, it's so scary, isn't it?

nwpu_qhd 2023-06-20

Is this magazine difficult?

clJiang 2023-06-19

27-Apr-2023 Submission
19-Jun-2023 Major repair + minor repair, AE rejected

GS 2023-06-18

Brother, when did you apply? Have you received any feedback? I have been waiting for three months and haven't heard anything.

qqxyf 2023-06-12

The second review process is a bit long. Have you sent an email for consultation during this time?

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started