Verified Reviews - IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

Matthew Chen 2023-04-08

Reply to Dr. Li:
If accepted to the conference, the submission can be withdrawn. We can submit to another conference next time.

Dr Li 2023-04-06

Can we reject the admission to the conference? If the conference is accepted, we won't be able to submit it to another journal for publication.

Matthew Chen 2023-04-04

Reply to Dr Li:
Normally, there are only 2 reviewers for the Intermag conference, and usually only one round of revisions is allowed.
If the first-round comments are the result of revisions from IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, it indicates that the reviewing comments are good. In this case, after one round of revisions, the probability of acceptance by the Magnetics journal is very high!
The first-round comments could also be the result of revisions for conference inclusion. In this situation, even if revisions are made, they will not be accepted by the Magnetics journal. The final outcome will still be a conference paper.

Dr Li 2023-03-19

What is the probability of this journal conference being accepted for submission?

Lyw1995 2022-04-16

2021.9 - Submit initial draft
December - Revision
March - Revision
April - Acceptance
The reviewers are very serious, and the editor is responsible.

寒泉水 2022-03-10

The journal review process is extremely slow. I suggest everyone to be cautious, it is really slow. I submitted for half a year and still haven't received any review comments, so I decided to withdraw my submission directly.

lc1113 2022-02-23

2020.12.21 Submission
2021.05.16 Revision Required, reviewed by three reviewers, with a total of 20 questions.
2021.05.24 First-round revision submission
2021.08.30 Revision Required, no issues from two reviewers, one reviewer raised 2 questions.
2021.09.05 Second-round revision submission
2021.11.07 Regular Paper: Accept Based on Reviews
2022.03 Published
Thank you to all editors and reviewers!
Wishing everyone a smooth submission process!

Franco 2022-02-21

21.06.27 Submission
21.12.01 Minor revision
22.02.17 Accepted
The journal has a relatively high recognition, but the review process is slow. If you cannot wait, it is recommended to remind the editor and administrator. They are both friendly.

寒泉水 2021-12-25

This is also my first time submitting to this journal. Ah, I sent an email to the person in the system. That person is responsible for website maintenance, not editing. The response was to wait patiently. Ah, I guess we'll just have to wait slowly. I even thought about withdrawing my submission. I thought about it and decided to write another article, otherwise, I won't be able to catch up.

寒泉水 2021-12-25

Me too, it's been nearly four months and there hasn't been any response. My previous submissions to other journals were accepted in about two months, but I've been waiting for this journal for four months. If I knew earlier, I wouldn't have submitted it.

Lyw1995 2021-12-23

May I ask how long it takes for friends who have submitted their manuscripts to receive the first review result?
It has been 3 and a half months since submission and it is still under review.
Thank you~!

iron 2021-12-03

Submitted on August 10, 2021, underwent major revisions on October 3, accepted on November 23, and proofed on December 2.
There were two reviewers, one was very kind and the other was more strict, but their opinions were sharp and fair.

Ingrid 2021-09-11

The journal is quite good.
Submitted in early March 2021; received minor revision comments by the end of May; accepted in mid-August.
After replying to the minor revisions, there was no response for two months, so I sent a reminder for the manuscript once.

菜鸟欲飞 2021-08-20

Overall, the review efficiency is high, and the editor is very good.
Submitted in January, received the first round of review comments in early February. There were three reviewers: 1# thought it was good and provided a small suggestion; 2# raised two questions and stated that if they were not explained well, it would not meet the acceptance criteria; 3# reviewer's comments had no substantial content and finally requested the addition of 6 references.
Took 10 days to revise. The second round of review ended in late March with two reviewers. 1# thanked the author for adopting the suggestions; 2# raised 8 new questions, and the general opinion was that the paper lacked innovation as there were already many related studies. However, the requested modifications had no relation to the content of the article, and I didn't know how to respond.
Spent 12 days brainstorming and replying. In early May, the review comments came back, and due to reviewer 2#'s opinion that the revision response was not serious and meticulous, the paper was rejected. Feeling sad and angry... But the editor believed the work was valuable and suggested resubmission.
Adjusted my mindset and resubmitted in mid-May after making changes. The modifications mainly involved reverting the previous revisions targeted at reviewer 2#...
Received the review comments in early August, with two reviewers. 1# reviewer thought the article was well-organized, had novel methods, and had practical value. They provided suggestions for modifying the titles of figures and tables, as well as one content modification suggestion; 2# reviewer raised a few minor questions, which were easy to address.
Took 4 days to revise and submitted the revised manuscript. Two days later, it was accepted - Regular Paper: Accept Based on Reviews.
It took some time, but the result was good. I am very grateful to editor Virostek, Kristy.

大开大海 2021-07-30

According to the comments above, it says "super fast, 1 to 2 weeks", but you have taken several months. What happened?

NEU-NDT 2021-07-15

Old brand magazines, the reviewers are very professional, especially meticulous about technical details, most of them require comprehensive experiments, and the review process is fast!

lc1113 2021-07-07

Hello, may I ask if your status has changed after the first review?

啦啦啦云在哭泣呢 2021-06-24

Hello, author. I would like to inquire about the page fee for submitting to "IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS." How much does it cost? Do I need to conduct physical experiments? How long does the initial review process take?

pgy_69 2021-05-23

Posted in early November 2020, and underwent major revisions by the end of December of the same year.
Followed by minor revisions in March 2021.
Accepted in April.
It was previously said that TIE was slow, but this time the speed exceeded my expectations. However, the page charge of $350 per page is a bit expensive. Nevertheless, I am willing to pay extra for additional pages.
The comments and critiques from the reviewers were highly professional. Although the criticism was harsh, I accepted them. Although I wrote this paper, I was not very knowledgeable about the relevant aspects and the technicalities associated with the article. However, after making the necessary revisions based on the reviewers' comments, I felt that this part of knowledge was clarified unexpectedly. This can be considered an unexpected gain.
I hope to make progress in scientific research in the future and publish in top journals. I also wish all fellow researchers that their efforts will be rewarded as they deserve. Finally, I wish TIE continued success.

Matthew Chen 2021-05-17

Accepted with revisions already submitted.
March 16, 2021: Manuscript submission for Intermag conference.
May 5, 2021: First review returned with two reviewers accepting (minor revisions), final edits provided by the editor.
May 8, 2021: Resubmission.
May 17, 2021: Accepted without further modifications.

universea 2021-05-09

01.09 Submission of the manuscript
03.03 Unable to find enough reviewers, the editor requested to recommend 4 reviewers
03.30 Consider publishing, minor revisions
04.06 Submit revised manuscript
05.03 Accepted, waiting for submission of the final draft
05.09 Submit final draft

铠黄 2021-05-09

The text translates to: "Submitted in November, returned for repair on April 2nd. The returned repair is under review, and the current status is under review. Is there a difference in capitalization for the word 'review'?"

xsxs 2021-04-29

May I ask what happened to your article? I submitted it, but the status has been "ADM under review" all along.

Matthew Chen 2021-04-26

Already submitted and accepted after revision.
2020.11.30. CEFC conference, manuscript submission.
2021.3.19. First review returned, accepted by 5 reviewers (minor revisions), final edits given for minor revisions, one foreigner showed great interest in my research, mainly addressing his comments.
2021.3.24. Resubmitted, added a new reviewer, the previous foreign reviewer thought the article was acceptable but provided additional suggestions for me to consider and make changes on my own. Editor still provided minor revisions.
2021.4.16. Second review returned, directly accepted on 2021.4.25, no further modification suggestions.

xsxs 2021-04-21

May I ask, if a submission is always in "under review" status, how long does this status usually last, and what does it mean?

毓流川 2021-03-04

May I ask how you operate when following up on a draft? How do you fill in the "subject" field? I don't understand what "CC" means on the journal's interface. Could you help explain it to me?

lc1113 2021-03-02

So, does the status "awaiting reviewer assignment" also mean undergoing external review? The paper I submitted two days ago has now changed its status to "under review". Wishing us all good results for our submissions!

铠黄 2021-03-01

I voted on November 7th and followed up once. They said it is still under review and the status remains the same as before. I can only wait.

AmnesiA88 2021-02-24

The second IEEE TMAG went relatively smoothly.
November 29, 2020: Submission, for about half a month it was in the "awaiting AE assignment" status, then it went through several transitions between "awaiting reviewers assignment" and "under review" statuses.
February 4, 2021: Received a major revision email, with 3 reviewers, 1 agreed to accept, and 2 accepted after modifications. There were nearly 20 issues in total, but no particularly difficult problems.
February 11, 2021: Submitted the revised manuscript.
February 22, 2021: Received an acceptance email.
February 24, 2021: Submitted the final version file.

lc1113 2021-02-20

Has your submission status changed again? Mine has also been "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" for over a month.

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started