拜拜拜仁 2021-07-05

Mine too, two minor repairs and one major repair, one was rejected, the deputy editor and editor rejected it directly.

TTLL 2021-06-13

2021.02.28, submission;
2021.04.15, major revision;
2021.05.26, submission of revised manuscript;
2021.06.12, acceptance.

A very good journal, with a relatively fast review process and professional feedback. It was very helpful in improving the quality of the article.

paperKing6688 2021-06-13

A total of 3 rounds, 5 reviewers, 4 agreed to accept, but one reviewer maliciously attacked (this reviewer completely did not understand what the article was about, and just rambled on). The most tragic thing is that even the Associate Editor is an idiot. It wasted 8 months... Comrades who submit applications for control should pay attention.

yinntag 2021-06-12

Brother, may I ask if the minimum time limit for resubmitting a revised manuscript is 3 months?

小段同志 2021-06-07

May I ask where I can find the writing format or template for a thesis?

Fisher1612 2021-06-04

It has been nearly 3 months since submission. It stayed in the EIC office and awaiting AE assignment for about a month. It then changed to "under review" and went back to "awaiting AE assignment" before finally returning to "under review". Yesterday afternoon, it changed to "awaiting AE recommendation" and this morning it changed back to "under review". Have any of you encountered similar issues? I am feeling anxious. The EIC is Yen-Shin, Lai.

2021.03.22 - Submitted
2021.03.25 - In EIC office
2021.04.02 - Awaiting AE assignment
2021.04.13 - Under review
2021.04.17 - Awaiting AE assignment
2021.04.24 - Under review
2021.06.03 - Awaiting AE recommendation
2021.06.04 - Under review

想做大王的小王 2021-06-04

I want to ask all the experts here, does the minor revision still need to be sent back to the reviewer?

想做大王的小王 2021-06-01

I am just like you. There were four reviewers, one of them rejected it, but the editor-in-chief gave it a major revision.

qingshaa 2021-05-31

Dear all, please exercise caution when submitting if you only have public datasets. I fell into a pitfall. An experimental rig, which should be used by the authors for verification, must include hardware components other than a PC/laptop.

拜拜拜仁 2021-05-31

The review process took a month and a half, with four reviewers. Two suggested minor revisions, one suggested major revisions, and one believed the article was not suitable for publication in this journal. The editor rejected it directly and did not allow resubmission. I can't quite understand it. Even accepting major revisions would have been fine.

TTLL 2021-05-29

I want to ask, how do you determine whether the reviewer's comments are major revisions, minor revisions, or rejection?

TTLL 2021-05-29

How to determine if the reviewer suggests major revision, minor revision, or rejection.

野 2021-05-26

2020.07.14 Paper submission;
2020.09.25 Received major revision notice, with 40 comments from 3 reviewers, very professional, took 6 weeks to revise;
2020.11.16 Received major revision notice, still 2 reviewers with questions, reviewer 1 raised some additional questions based on the previous response, took 30 days to revise;
2021.3.19 Received minor revision notice, still 1 reviewer with questions, reviewer 1 requested detailed explanation of 1 figure, revised in 3 days;
2021.05.05 Accept.

我想直博 2021-04-28

It has been two months since my first review, and it is still under review. Should I continue waiting or send an email to the editor?

liuzhongyong 2021-04-28

Submitted in May 2020, the article underwent one major revision and two minor revisions before finally being accepted. I hope to contribute more articles to TIE Journal in the future. I also wish TIE Journal continued success.

想做大王的小王 2021-04-27

I also need to return for repairs in these two days. Besides writing a reply, do I need to write a cover letter?

学术小菜鸡2333 2021-04-21

The review process of TIE recently feels quite fast, with completion in just three months.

2021.01.29 First submission
2021.02.27 Major revision, with a total of four reviewers, three of whom had relatively positive evaluations but with numerous issues, while one was difficult to handle.
2021.03.25 Resubmission after revision
2021.04.09 Minor revision
2021.04.17 Acceptance

想做大王的小王 2021-04-13

Soon, in 20 days, the review will be returned. There are 4 reviewers, one rejection, and the editor requested major revisions, which took 6 weeks to complete. There are only 20 days left before it needs to be returned, causing tension.

jianghuxiaoxiaosheng 2021-04-10

My editor is also the same. He directly told me that I didn't have experimental verification and rejected it, which is inexplicable. I had nearly two pages of experimental section out of the eight-page main text. Even if they rejected me for reasons like the direction not being consistent or lack of innovation, it would be better than using such a meaningless template to reject people.

dahai 2021-03-31

Okay, thanks bro, I'll wait a bit more.

LMSJ 2021-03-30

Normally, it usually takes one to two weeks to wait for the editor's feedback. There is no need to worry, good luck!

dahai 2021-03-24

Excuse me, has the editor given any news? I have also been waiting for a week.

想做大王的小王 2021-03-17

Excuse me, has the result come out? I have been waiting for the editor's opinion for over a week. Is it because the editor is too busy and has no time to handle it?

想做大王的小王 2021-03-17

May I ask if there is any result? I have been waiting for the editor's opinion for over a week. Is it normal?

想做大王的小王 2021-03-17

Has anyone encountered this situation? Awaiting EIC decision for a week now, still no news.

想做大王的小王 2021-03-16

Posted on 2021.1.31
Waiting for the editor's opinion since 2021.3.10

It feels quite fast, but I don't know the result. It has been a week waiting for the editor's opinion.

倾国倾城亦飘零 2021-03-12

2019.1.6 submitted;
2019.4.8 major revision;
2019.6.9 accepted.

Translation:

2019.1.6 submitted;
2019.4.8 major revision;
2019.6.9 accepted.

李冰冰 2021-03-06

My submission was also rejected like this.

chensiya 2021-03-06

I was also rejected like this.

hj73780 2021-03-02

2020.9.4 Paper submission
2020.12.22 Major revision
2021.2.16 Major revision
2021.2.22 Acceptance
There were two major revisions, with five reviewers during the first revision. It is necessary to carefully respond to each reviewer's comments as this journal requires approval from all reviewers for acceptance. Therefore, it is important to address each reviewer's questions seriously during the revision process.