叶叶的小雨 2021-10-28

10.28 still under review,,, very worried, anxious about the situation not being good.

iowefkp 2021-10-26

May I ask how long after receiving will I have early access?

WEI 2021-10-25

Has the editor recently changed?

投稿不拒 2021-10-22

2021-1-6, Submission
2021-3-4, Major Revision (two months for modification)
2021-4-1, Resubmission
2021-5-13, Minor Revision
2021-5-21, Resubmission
2021-6-20, Acceptance

SCI工厂 2021-10-14

Can it be related to machinery? Are there algorithms and mechanical problems?

淮上晚风 2021-10-14

Re-submitted on July 19th, returned on August 26th. Major revisions were suggested by three reviewers in total. Two reviewers accepted the paper, while one raised some questions regarding practical application. The paper was re-submitted on September 3rd and accepted on October 13th. The reviewing status changed multiple times during this period, and initially, it was thought that new reviewers would be assigned. However, it turned out to be a false alarm as there was no need for new reviewers. One reviewer still provided some suggestions, but in the end, the editor granted acceptance. As there were no prominent authors, I am truly happy to have it accepted.

iowefkp 2021-10-13

Hello, may I ask if Xiao Xiu has been at AE for almost a week? Is this normal?

青春123 2021-10-13

2021.5.25 Submission
2021.7.7 First review result: major revisions. There were 5 reviewers who provided constructive feedback, pointing out some key technical issues and suggesting that the paper's contribution and innovation need improvement.
2021.8.11 Revised manuscript submitted
2021.9.15 Received minor revisions for the second review. Two reviewers had suggestions, with one mentioning some research content of personal interest and the other pointing out some grammar errors.
2021.9.17 Revised manuscript submitted
2021.10.13 Received acceptance notification

Isaac591 2021-10-11

Same 2 minor revisions, 1 major revision, 1 direct rejection, AE recommends rejection, Co-EiC rejects. Submit to tim, R1 major revision, R2 minor revision, accepted.

Isaac591 2021-10-11

Two reviewers pointed out some minor issues that could be improved with some innovation. One reviewer provided some constructive criticism for major revisions. Another reviewer stated that there was no innovation and recommended rejection. The Associate Editor (AE) agreed with the rejection and the Co-EiC (Co-Editor-in-Chief) also rejected it, stating that resubmission is not allowed. It seems that the reviewer who rejected it had a very flashy idea of innovation in mind. As a countermove, the paper was submitted to TIM (a different journal). In the first round of revisions, the reviewer was very meticulous and asked numerous questions, which were addressed one by one in the revision. In the second round of revisions, some additional questions were added and the paper was revised again, leading to its acceptance.

钟pj 2021-10-11

2021.7.7: submitted
2021.8.28: major revision
2021.9.8: resubmitted
2021.10.10: accept

叶叶的小雨 2021-10-08

2021.9.14: Submitted
2021.9.16: in EIC office
2021.9.22 morning: Assigned to AE
2021.9.22 evening: under Review

Waiting for the results...

abelard 2021-10-02

What does "awaiting ae recommendation for a week" mean?

Johnxuxu 2021-09-17

May I ask if Little Xiu has been assigned to AE continuously after returning? Is that normal?

想做大王的小王 2021-09-08

The basic review is pretty much under review for the whole week. Mine is the first major overhaul, followed by a second minor revision.

THEPENG 2021-09-01

Excuse me, when you say "大修" in English, do you mean "rejection and resubmission" or "major"?

Lyw1995 2021-08-29

The minimum number of reviews set has been reached, but the AE still wants to wait for opinions from other reviewers and manually changed it to "under review".

abelard 2021-08-27

Hello, I have also experienced a similar situation. May I ask what the reason is?

abelard 2021-08-26

Excuse me, bro, I am also experiencing this situation, what does it mean?

Mike_Zhao 2021-08-12

4.22 submit - Submitted on April 22nd
6.22 major revision - Major revision requested on June 22nd
8.3 submit - Submitted on August 3rd
现在： assigned to AE - Currently assigned to AE (Associate Editor)
请问大修后多久送到审稿人手上的，有没有找新的审稿人。- How long does it take for the manuscript to be sent to the reviewers after the major revision, and has a new reviewer been assigned?
我一审有4个reviewer+AE。- I had four reviewers plus the AE for the first review.

想做大王的小王 2021-08-04

There was no reviewer's feedback, so the minor revision was edited and accepted. The plagiarism rate was reduced a bit, and that's all there is to it.

CaptainBig 2021-08-02

Did you return the edited manuscript to the reviewer after making revisions in Xiaoxiu?

唐牛才是食神 2021-07-26

Brother, your situation is similar to mine. Can I seek advice from you? Thank you very much.

想做大王的小王 2021-07-25

After going through one major revision, two minor revisions, four reviewers, one rejection, two major revisions, and one minor revision (with one reviewer consistently rejecting), the editor did a great job and eventually accepted it. Thank you for sharing, everyone can take it as a reference.

1.31 submitted
2.7 under review
3.10 awaiting AE recommendation
3.10 awaiting EIC decision
3.19 major revision
4.29 submitted
5.27 awaiting EIC decision
6.3 mini revision
6.30 submitted
7.11 mini revision
7.25 accepted

想做大王的小王 2021-07-19

What you said is a bit absolute. I had four reviewers, and one of them consistently rejected it, but the editor still gave it major and minor revisions.

cloudMEC 2021-07-18

When the third submission was made, it took about 2 months to receive 5 review comments. Among them, 2 were accepted directly, 2 required major revisions (guess), and 1 required minor revisions (guess). The associate editor in charge recommended major revisions. The revised version was sent back after 2 weeks, and it was directly accepted 3 months later! The routine of this journal is basically that once a rejection occurs, it is difficult to avoid rejection (unless it is directly accepted, which may trigger major revisions). All reviewers and the associate editor must agree to accept the paper. The associate editor sometimes likes to provide comments, occasionally more than 1 or 2. I am obsessed with this journal and have struggled for a long time. It is a very good journal, although I have been rejected and suffered a lot, I have benefited greatly. If you are dissatisfied with the journal because of the rejection comments, please take a look at the instructions on the IES Society, because your arguments may lead to misunderstandings among readers, and the responsibility lies with the author. In other words, if you think the reviewer's comments are "nonsense" and your paper is rejected because of this comment, then the responsibility lies with you, because you caused the misunderstanding, and such misunderstandings are easily formed among a large readership. You can appeal if you disagree with the comments, but it is almost impossible to change the negative reviewer in the next round of review, for the reasons mentioned above! You must convince this negative reviewer! In conclusion, it is a very good journal, a torturous experience, but a worthwhile process!

想做大王的小王 2021-07-14

I would like to ask if anyone has encountered the problem of high duplication rate. Are there any recommended websites or editing agencies?

小白会长001 2021-07-10

I have also encountered this before, and the actual quality of this journal does not feel that good.

Lyw1995 2021-07-06

Two major revisions, 5 reviewers, a total of more than 10 months of acceptance.

想做大王的小王 2021-07-06

Little Xiuxiu has been back for a week, and has been waiting for the chief editor's decision, feeling nervous.