风云天下 2022-01-03

2020.08.06 Submission
2020.09.25 First review, 5 reviewers, 1 minor revision, 1 acceptance, 2 major revisions, dozens of comments, AE gave rejection with possibility of resubmission;
TIE requires resubmission after 3 months, but due to the impact of the pandemic and other reasons, it was delayed. It took nearly 2 months to make the changes and finally submitted after 6 months;
2021.03.24 Submitted revised manuscript;
2021.06.03 Second review, 4 reviewers, 2 acceptances, 1 minor revision, 1 major revision; AE requested major revision;
2021.07.12 Submitted second revised manuscript;
2021.08.17 Review received, AE requested minor revision;
2021.09.09 Submitted revised manuscript;
2021.10.09 Fourth review, 4 reviewers accepted, one reviewer still unsatisfied with a sentence, another round of minor revision!
2021.10.25 Submitted fourth revised manuscript;
2021.11.28 Congratulations!
2021.12.06 Submitted final materials and copyright agreement
2021.12.21 Early Access
2021.12.25 Proofreading for publication
2022.01.01 Proofreading again
It is indeed not easy to get published in a top journal. It took a year and a half, and it truly took a toll on the soul, haha! Thank you very much to all the reviewers and editors for their valuable comments, which greatly improved the quality of the paper! In short, let's continue to work hard!

小胖萌萌哒 2022-01-01

The most frustrating thing is that even this person's students' articles are simulations of control theory, and it's really sympathy for you.

mhzhc 2021-12-28

Hello, I have encountered the same situation. May I ask if it will change to another status later? Or will it remain under review indefinitely?

Johnxuxu 2021-12-26

The state has not been urgent for more than 20 days, why are you in a hurry after just ten days...

handsome520 2021-12-25

It has been over ten days since submission, but it is still assigned to Ae. Is it because of the Christmas break? Or is it going to take a while longer? The initial review is really challenging.

攒一身可爱 2021-12-23

Learn from the big shots!! How should we solve doubts about contributions and novelty...

攒一身可爱 2021-12-23

Learn from the expert!! How can doubts about contribution and novelty be resolved? You are too excellent!!!

QwQ0110 2021-12-23

The reviewers are serious and careful, and the questions are very valuable. The only problem is that the workload of responding to comments from five reviewers is too high.
June 6, submission
October 11, first review result: major revision
November 13, upload the revision
December 21, second review result: acceptance

QwQ0110 2021-12-23

The reviewers are serious and meticulous, and the questions are very valuable. The only problem is that the workload of reviewing the comments from five reviewers is too large. The initial review is slow, but the second review time is normal. The first review requires major revisions, while the second review is accepted without any revisions.

萤火可成星辰 2021-12-03

Brother, what was the final result? I also had a major overhaul in the second round and was initially assigned to AE for more than ten days. Then it changed to "under review" and now it has changed back to "assigned to AE".

萤火可成星辰 2021-12-03

What was the final outcome, bro?

军 2021-12-02

Stay calm, there is hope if it is submitted for review.

xiao邢 2021-12-01

Bro, what was the final outcome? I'm also in the same situation, I'm so anxious.

xiao邢 2021-12-01

Brother, what did the chief editor's opinion say in the end? I am in the same situation, still waiting.

Willes 2021-11-29

29-Nov-2021 Awaiting EIC Decision

Translation: Awaiting EIC Decision on November 29, 2021

萤火可成星辰 2021-11-28

Congratulations on your paper being accepted. Has your status changed afterwards? Over here, my paper has been in the second round of revisions for two weeks, and it has remained assigned to the Associate Editor.

abelard 2021-11-26

Why is it that after I submit the revised draft for major revision, it directly shows "Under review"?

萤火可成星辰 2021-11-26

Thank you. The change in submission status for this revision is indeed much slower than before, probably because AE is too busy.

陌路无悔 2021-11-26

This situation is relatively rare. After I submitted my major revision, it went directly to "Under Review". However, as long as TIE has given approval for the major revision, there shouldn't be any major issues as long as I make careful modifications.

萤火可成星辰 2021-11-25

I would like to ask the experts for advice. The revised draft for the second round of major revisions has been submitted. There are only two reviewers who have comments, and they are all regarding some minor issues. The deadline for the revisions was one week, but it has already been 10 days and the status is still "assigned to AE." I would like to know what the situation is. Thank you.

萤火可成星辰 2021-11-25

Just asking for advice, the revised draft of the second round of major revisions has been submitted. Only two reviewers have opinions, both of which are minor details. The modifications were due a week ago, but it has been 10 days and it is still in the "assigned to AE" status. Could you please tell me what the situation is? Thank you.

陌路无悔 2021-11-24

Sorry, the receiving date is 2021.11.18.

陌路无悔 2021-11-24

2021.04.06 Submitted
2021.06.01 Reject with Possibility for Resubmission
2021.09.01 Resubmitted
2021.10.22 Major Revisions
2021.10.27 Resubmitted
2021.10.18 Accept

The whole process went relatively smoothly. The first submission was rejected and required resubmission for four reviewers, which took nearly two months. The given revision time was no less than three months, and the feedback was generally positive. The main issue was that some parts of the article were not explained clearly and needed additional experimental data. The second revision involved six reviewers and took less than two months. They added two more reviewers to the previous four. Four reviewers agreed to accept the article, one required minor revisions, and the other requested modifications. The problems were mainly minor at this stage. The acceptance came less than a month after the resubmission.

In my personal opinion, the following points are important:
1. All authors should use their institutional email addresses when submitting the manuscript, and the article should not exceed eight and a half pages.
2. The quality of the article itself should be ensured, including innovation, theoretical contributions, and experimental integrity. Particularly, the integrity of the experiments is crucial, and any abnormal phenomena or trends should be clearly explained in the Discussion section.
3. Every question raised by reviewers should be addressed and answered carefully and accurately.

欧阳小白 2021-11-24

2021.8.6 submitted
2021.10.12 major revisions
2021.11.2 resubmitted
2021.11.23 accept

Translation:
2021.8.6 submitted
2021.10.12 major revisions
2021.11.2 resubmitted
2021.11.23 accepted

探际 2021-11-18

2021.8.2 submitted
2021.11.2 major revision

叶叶的小雨 2021-11-10

10.5 Awaiting EIC Decision translates to: "10.5 is the waiting period for the EIC (Editor-in-Chief) decision."

电气汪汪 2021-11-04

Around half a month to twenty days early access.

cquptyang 2021-11-03

Received first-round review three months after submission: Reject with Possibility for Resubmission
I'm not sure if there is still hope after resubmission. I hope to communicate with someone who has experienced this situation.

linqingyuan 2021-11-03

It has been more than ten days since the submission, and it has been in the "IN EIC OFFICE" status all along. It's really strange. Has any brother encountered this situation before?

叶叶的小雨 2021-10-29

2021.10.29 Morning: Awaiting AE Recommendation.