青蔷薇23 2023-07-16

I want to ask everyone, when submitting to this journal, should the author's biography be included at the end of the article?

whyupupup 2023-07-03

I didn't expect that the impact factor would increase and then decrease in the end.

陈昱衡 2023-04-19

I invested in Wave Energy and it was under review the next day. What field are you in? I thought it would be submitted for approval on the second day...

麦克斯韦2 2023-04-01

2023.1.11 After submission, it directly shows "Under Review", and it has been almost 3 months now without any updates. It is also not like Elsevier where you can see detailed progress. It is indeed slow, and the innovation aspect is not great either. I wonder how the result will turn out.

Kevin 2023-03-17

I am the same as FAST, once I submit a paper, it is under review status. ADM: ScholnickPhilippidis, Randi ADM: Mecsey, Kristin

FAST 2022-08-28

May I ask what was the status of your manuscript when you first submitted it? As soon as I submitted the manuscript, the status was ADM: ScholnickPhilippidis, Randi Under Review.

爱你喔 2022-03-09

This journal is so frustrating. It took 6 months for the review process, and the reviewers provided a few suggestions for rejection. This journal is completely irresponsible towards the authors. The review cycle is incredibly long, especially for submissions in the field of power electronics and power systems. It's really, really long. However, for submissions in the field of electrical engineering, you can give it a try as the cycle is relatively fast.

爱你喔 2022-02-17

This journal is as slow as a dog, there has been no news after the initial review for 5 months. It is said that most articles that come back within 2-3 months are rejected, while those that require major revisions have a greater chance of acceptance after 4 months or more. Articles related to electrical engineering are preferred, and the review process is slightly faster for these topics, as most reviewers of this journal are more familiar with electrical engineering.

爱你喔 2022-02-01

This journal really needs careful consideration before submitting. It is slower than a turtle, so I truly advise everyone to think twice before submitting their articles. Be cautious, be cautious, be cautious, be cautious, be cautious, be cautious, be cautious, be cautious, be cautious.

chillingboi 2021-12-06

2021.10.09 Submission
2021.12.5 Rejected - Do Not Resubmit
Three reviewers, the main issue was that the paper lacked strong innovation. One reviewer asked more specialized questions, while the other two didn't ask much. I am planning to submit to another journal and wish myself good luck.

研界小白 2021-11-22

How is your submitted journal doing?

游客1 2021-10-19

Currently, the review process has been ongoing for 6 months and it is still "under review". We have already sent reminders but it hasn't been effective.

chillingboi 2021-10-19

Excuse me, how many reviewers are there now, 3 or 6?

chillingboi 2021-10-19

May I ask about the current situation? Can you send an email to the editor to urge them?

游客1 2021-08-19

Already submitted for more than 4 months, still under review. If you want to publish your article quickly, be cautious about submitting.

r0807 2021-04-11

16-Aug-2020 Submit
26-Oct-2020 Revise and Resubmit
18-Dec-2020 Resubmit
23-Jan-2021 Revise and Resubmit
01-Feb-2021 Resubmit
06-Feb-2021 Revise and Resubmit
08-Mar-2021 Resubmit
10-Apr-2021 Accept Without Changes

Approximately 8 months and 3 revisions were made.

阿云 2021-02-16

What specific requirements are there for the format? Is the review process fast? Is there a fee?