Verified Reviews - IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS FOR VIDEO TECHNOLOGY
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

诺顿 2023-08-07

Submission experience:
2023.8.1: submitted
2023.8.6: in peer review

zzz 2023-08-06

2023.7.31, Submitted
2023.8.6, In Peer Review

Luckyya 2023-08-05

There may be too many drafts now.

Luckyya 2023-08-05

The email says not to resubmit.

名字_科研新手 2023-07-30

2023.1.08 submitted
2023.1.12 immediate reject
2023.1.28 submitted
2023.4.19 reject and invite to resubmit
2023.4.29 resubmitted
2023.6.17 reject

Translation:
2023.1.08 submitted
2023.1.12 immediately rejected
2023.1.28 submitted
2023.4.19 rejected and invited to resubmit
2023.4.29 resubmitted
2023.6.17 rejected

H 2023-07-28

What is submitted in the new system can be found in the old system. The registration for both systems requires the same email.

mczhouwei 2023-07-28

Signature boss, indeed very fast, one month.

RICARD 2023-07-27

Still no change.
Does your paper have a co-author named Fellow? If there are many experts, it should be faster.

mczhouwei 2023-07-27

XD, haven't you started yet? I have one that I submitted in early May, and it's still in peer review.

double_win 2023-07-27

May I ask if you submitted it in the old system of ScholarOne? After submitting in the new system, I couldn't see the submission record in the old system.

wxz0918 2023-07-26

The translation of "我投的regular paper" from Chinese to English is "I submitted a regular paper."

wxz0918 2023-07-26

I chose regular paper.

RICARD 2023-07-26

Yes, after submission, it will show "a revision has been submitted".

wusuowei_m 2023-07-26

Is it submitted in the old system during minor revision? https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tcsvt

wusuowei_m 2023-07-26

Was the minor revision submitted in the old system?
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tcsvt

xhy 2023-07-25

Added a reviewer and raised some minor questions.

Sunnky 2023-07-25

Brother, has the rejection been resubmitted for three months and changed the reviewer?

xhy 2023-07-24

2022/11/27 submit
2023/2/13 Reject and Invite to Resubmit
2023/3/07 a resubmission has been submitted
2023/6/06 Minor Revision
2023/6/09 a revision has been submitted
2023/7/24 Accept as Transactions Paper

Translation:
2022/11/27 submit
2023/2/13 Reject and Invite to Resubmit
2023/3/07 a resubmission has been submitted
2023/6/06 Minor Revision
2023/6/09 a revision has been submitted
2023/7/24 Accept as Transactions Paper

H 2023-07-24

2023.7.24 in peer review

空白~~ 2023-07-24

Do you have a period for submitting manuscripts for review? I didn't understand what it means.

空白~~ 2023-07-24

I feel like they want me to review a manuscript. On July 11th, I received an email asking me to review it. I glanced at it and realized it wasn't from my Associate Editor (AE), so I didn't reply in time. On July 13th (almost two and a half months after submission), I logged into the system and saw "awaiting recommendation," thinking it was the first review result. On July 14th, the system changed to "in peer review." Then, on July 16th, I received another email asking me to review the same manuscript, but this time it was assigned by my AE. I got scared and quickly agreed. I am thinking they want me to review it!

想发NC 2023-07-22

2023.7.22, first review with two reviewers, major revision. It has been over a week since the second review entered "awaiting recommendation".

菜鸟啊 2023-07-22

The email I registered is different.

想发NC 2023-07-20

2023.07.20 My situation is also awaiting recommendation, and it is painful.

mczhouwei 2023-07-20

You should be almost stable now. I asked about internal news and found out that TCSVT currently has a huge amount of submissions. Previously, in the review letters, there would always be the reject or major/minor decisions from each reviewer. But now, they have relaxed the process and removed the reviewer's opinions, allowing the Associate Editors (AEs) to freely choose and perform well. This makes it easier to filter out some articles, and each AE has a target for the number of rejections. Currently, it is unlikely to receive two positive opinions, even if there are many minor comments that don't seem important. The review process is too fast, resulting in a loss of the previous review quality. The opinions are mostly superficial. However, you can still give it a try since the review process is fast.

RICARD 2023-07-20

2023.0720 still awaiting recommendation, torturing people in Asia.

奥尼恩 2023-07-20

Do you have it now? Both systems should require the same email account to be registered in order to be associated.

奥尼恩 2023-07-20

Mine is the same, did you submit to the special issue or the regular issue?

wxz0918 2023-07-19

May I ask why there are a bunch of letters and numbers in parentheses after the numerical code of my submission? It stretches for tens of characters, which didn't happen in my previous submissions. Has anyone else encountered this situation?

菜鸟啊 2023-07-18

Why can't I see the paper I submitted in ScholarOne?

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started