Verified Reviews - IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

Muser 2023-07-17

Control the white moonlight of researchers in the field of science and technology.
The requirements are very high, and the review process is very long. Previously, I submitted a Full Paper, and it went through three rounds of reviews, taking nearly 20 months. However, the quality of the review comments is much higher than those of similar journals I have submitted to. Many of the comments show that the reviewers have deep insights into the relevant aspects. I sincerely thank the editor and the reviewers.
P.S. The classification of the Chinese Academy of Sciences is currently just for entertainment. Even the top journals in robotics are still in the second tier. I heard that there are still super top journals in mathematics and operations research in the third tier... Reputation is something that is known by everyone.

DRL-AHU 2023-06-06

In English, the translation of the text is: "In the circle, it is well known that TAC and Automatica are the top international journals in the field of automation."

lucky paper 2023-05-10

May I ask, in the status of TAC, does "Under review" mean it has been sent for external review? Or does it still remain in the editing and reviewing process? I am not sure if there is a difference between "Under review" and "Under Review" in the TAC status.

CNPK 2023-03-07

2021-04 Submission (long text)
2021-10 First review feedback (reject and resubmit - short text)
2021-12 Resubmission (short text)
2022-06 Second review feedback (conditional accept)
2022-06 Resubmission
2022-09 Acceptance

副叫兽 2022-12-31

This journal ranks among the top five in all IEEE TRANS, completely dominating TCYB and TIE. It being classified as "second-tier" in the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) classification is simply laughable!

大家都发top 2022-07-01

Rejection and Resubmission (Short Text), it has been 4 months and 20 days already, and there is still no news. Does this mean the chances of success are slim?

12321111111 2022-05-17

2021-04-27 Post (Long Article)
2021-11-2 First Review Feedback (Rejected for Resubmission - Long Article), 5 reviewers
2021-11-23 Feedback (Long Article)
2022-04-13 Second Review Feedback (Rejected for Resubmission - Short Article), additional 2 reviewers added
2022-4-25 Feedback (Short Article)
2022-5-15 Accepted

Chacha 2022-04-15

Not externally reviewed, rejected by AE after 2 months of submission.

mathsxdg 2022-04-06

This is a top-tier journal recognized by the industry, categorized as Zone 2 by the Chinese Academy of Sciences. How can we bear with this situation? Why do many universities use this zone classification to evaluate researchers? If this continues, academia will become corrupted. I hope this issue receives attention.

sci冲 2021-07-22

2020-12-10 Submission (long article), under review after 12 days.
2021-03-08 First review completed (reject and resubmit), 3 reviewers, one neutral opinion, one suggestion to submit a shorter version, one positive opinion.
2021-04-49 Returned (shorter version), under review after 13 days.
2021-07-10 Status changed to decision pending.
2021-07-16 (6 days later) Conditional accept.

蝉鸣夏至 2021-05-02

After revision, the technical note was conditionally accepted after two and a half months. Both reviewers suggested acceptance with only one small question to answer. After further revision, it was finally accepted this month. Including the initial review, the entire process took less than a year and two months (including some significant delays from the authors during the revision period). The estimated publication date is one year after acceptance.

我思故我在 2021-03-16

May I ask where to download this double-column template?

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started