Verified Reviews - IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING LETTERS
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

tyrela 2022-11-15

Normal, there should be differing opinions from reviewers, and the Associate Editor should add another reviewer and review it again.

OceanYu 2022-11-05

How long has everyone been waiting for feedback on the first review? It's already November 5th and there's still no news.

pandamaster 2022-10-19

Posted on 2022.09.06
In peer review as of 2022.09.13
It has been more than 40 days, so it's not very fast.

爱做梦的奋青 2022-10-18

22-10-07, submitted
22-10-16, senior area editor assigned, pre-screening
22-10-17, associate editor assigned, in peer review

启铎 2022-10-17

10.17 Submitted

OceanYu 2022-10-17

22-09-20, First submission
22-09-22, Senior Area Editor assigned
22-09-23, Associate Editor assigned, in peer review
22-12-13, First review feedback: AQ
22-12-22, Revision submitted
22-12-23, Accepted

Junnt 2022-09-20

Record the submission process:
08-29-22, first submission.
08-31-22, editor rejects the submission due to excessive number of appendix pages.
08-31-22, second submission.
09-07-22, in peer review: Senior Area Editor.
09-09-22, in peer review: Associate Editor.
10-15-22, decision to accept with mandatory minor revisions (AQ).
10-21-22, submit revised paper.
10-27-22, accepted.

Just a thought, the process was really fast!

菜菜 2022-09-13

Share a wave of submission time nodes (to see if it really takes 2-3 months).
Submitted on August 31, 2022.
Senior Area Editor assigned on September 8, 2022.
Associate Editor assigned on September 13, 2022. Stas: In Peer Review.
- Until now.

YASH 2022-09-08

I submitted the revised version on August 12th, and now it has been almost a month, but it is still in peer review, and the status has not changed.

KW-J 2022-09-06

May I ask, what was the outcome of the follow-up? I have also encountered a similar situation.

YASH 2022-08-20

Is it normal for the review status to change from "awaiting AE decision" to "in peer review" after Xiaoxiu returns?

letpubgo 2022-08-18

This "in Peer Reviewing" could also be another AE assigned outside the field editor in the pre-review stage.

lyh5885 2022-08-15

Just wondering, should the reminder letter be sent through the system or privately via email? Should it be sent to the AE or the contact person on the system?

EatonL 2022-08-09

Two rejects, one revise and resubmit. The first reviewer said there was no core innovation (which I cannot agree with since there are no similar methods in the field, perhaps the reviewer is more traditional and does not approve of DL methods). The second reviewer didn't say much about the revise and resubmit. The third reviewer gave a reject, but the reasons are acceptable, they just thought there were some grammar flaws in the writing and not enough experiments. Now I urgently need the paper, so I have no choice but to supplement the experiments and resubmit, hoping for a quick acceptance. I don't know if it will still take three months.

EatonL 2022-07-21

Translated text: I submitted it on June 27, 2022, and received an email on July 5th saying that the AE (Account Executive) had been assigned. However, there has been no further communication since then. Experts, is this progress normal?

zxin0217 2022-07-18

May I ask how long it will take for proof after you submit the final document?

zxin0217 2022-07-14

Hello, you were hired too, but have you received the proof notification yet?

razor152 2022-06-23

Submitted Mar. 14, 2022;
AQ May 25, 2022;
Revised Jun. 7, 2022;
Accepted Jun. 13, 2022;

The journal's processing speed is very fast.
It feels like there is a core innovation point, the experiments are comprehensive, so there shouldn't be any major issues.

Jjay 2022-05-14

Is there a formatting requirement for submitting this article?

letpubSCU123 2022-05-07

May I ask if AQ will return for review?

letpubSCU123 2022-05-07

May I ask if the AQ modification is sent back for the reviewer's review? Thank you.

letpubSCU123 2022-05-07

May I ask if AQ will return and send it to the reviewer?

letpubSCU123 2022-05-07

May I ask if the revised version will be sent back to the reviewer after minor revisions are made and accepted (aq)?

liuyyy111 2022-05-06

2021.11.10 submitted - Submitted on November 10, 2021
2021.11.14 in peer review - In peer review as of November 14, 2021
2022.02.23 第一次催稿 - First reminder sent on February 23, 2022
2022.04.14 第二次催稿 - Second reminder sent on April 14, 2022
2022.05.06 Accept with Mandatory Revisions - Accepted with mandatory revisions on May 6, 2022

Skycactus 2022-04-21

First submission:
R1 aq, R2 r, questioning the method used in the article. AE r.
Resubmission, explaining why this method was used based on practical and previous literature. Assigned original AE and reviewers:
R1 aq, R2 r (same reasons as the first time). AE r.

Impression of submission: The review process was fast, and the reviewers were professional. It is not recommended to resubmit when encountering a stubborn reviewer as it would be a waste of time.

bit-byte 2022-03-20

Yes, I will only be back in February.

abc 2022-03-19

Is the length of submission for this journal not supposed to exceed four pages??

大石兀鲁思 2022-03-17

Brother, I want to ask if the comments from the first review came back directly in February after transferring to peer review in November?

bit-byte 2022-03-16

11.21 Submission
11.24 Pre-screening
11.25 Assign AE, in peer review
2.15 ACCEPT WITH MANDATORY MINOR REVISIONS (AQ)
2.26 Submit revisions
3.13 Accepted

大石兀鲁思 2022-02-27

I'm in the same situation. It has been half a month and it is still in peer review status.

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More