Zh66 2023-07-30

How long does it take to receive the first review comments? How many reviewers are there?

Zh66 2023-07-28

Submitted on June 15th, currently undergoing review.

最初の 2023-07-28

2023.7.21 提交 (Submitted)

__gtyl 2023-07-18

Hello, have you resubmitted after the rejection? How do you know if the reviewer is requesting major or minor revisions? Thank you.

momog 2023-07-17

Hello, I would like to ask, has your article been proofread?

epipole 2023-07-07

Yes, as far as I recall, the status of my submission has been "Undergoing Review" until I receive the review results.

dawnW 2023-07-06

Is "Undergoing review" the status before the initial review comes back? After being assigned to ADM, it still shows "Undergoing review". How long does it usually take to indicate that it has been submitted for review?

小萌嘴儿 2023-07-05

We are almost the same. I had a major overhaul during the first trial for 54 days, along with some minor issues. Then, I returned for repairs on June 1st, and it has been 35 days now, and it is still undergoing.

epipole 2023-07-05

The initial review took two months and resulted in major revisions. Fortunately, the comments from the reviewers were not too significant. Following their suggestions, I added some images and explanations and made further revisions for 20 days. Now, it has been more than 20 days, and the status is still "Undergoing Review." I don't know when I will find out the results.

hjdx/// 2023-06-28

I'm sorry, but "xsxsxs" does not appear to be a valid text or phrase in any language. Could you please provide a different text for translation?

legendary 2023-06-27

I heard before that it was quite slow, but the result proves to be moderate, not fast nor slow. As long as it doesn't cross the summer vacation, the reviewing speed is still acceptable.

6210u 2023-05-26

Hello, may I ask how long it takes to receive the typeset proof from the publishing house after you submit the final version?

6210u 2023-05-26

2023.5.23 Receive
2023.5.25 Submit Final version

6210u 2023-05-26

After submitting the final version, how long will it take for the proofreading? Will the proofreading notification be displayed on the submission website or only sent to the corresponding author?

lcy 2023-05-26

2022.12.23 Submission
2023.2.23 Major Revision
2023.3.17 Minor Revision
2023.5.7 Accept

lcy 2023-05-26

The review process is relatively fast.

lsl19970909 2023-05-18

Update:
2023.02.15 Submitted
2023.03.22 Received reviewer's comments, major revisions
2023.03.31 Major revisions submitted
2023.5.14 Minor revisions
2023.5.17 Minor revisions submitted
2023.5.18 Accepted

Hykesico 2023-05-02

May I ask how long we have to wait after submitting for major repairs?

Hykesico 2023-04-30

2023.3.22 Submitted
2023.4.29 Major Revision
2023.5.2 Submitted Revision
2023.5.17 Accepted

purfreyct 2023-04-21

2022.07 Submission
2022.11 Minor revision
2023.04 Acceptance
It's absurd that it took nearly half a year to be accepted after completing the minor revision.

爱吃炸酱面的晗 2023-04-11

The article that was rejected on 2023.4.11 has undergone major revisions in the experimental methods section and has been resubmitted, hoping for positive results.

Update:
Received reviewer comments on 2023.5.18, requiring two major revisions and one minor revision.
Submitted revised manuscript on 2023.6.5.
Accepted on 2023.6.18.

lsl19970909 2023-04-08

2023.02.15 Submission
2023.03.22 Return of review comments, major revisions
2023.03.31 Submission of major revisions
Hope for a good outcome!

JKway 2023-04-08

Brother, two agreed and one suggested to switch sides. Has all of this been rejected by TGRS? Isn't this considered a major revision?

JKway 2023-04-08

Bro, if one reviewer rejects the tgrs you submitted, does it mean it's rejected? Why does it feel a bit exaggerated?

爱吃炸酱面的晗 2023-04-05

But the system only shows "reject" and there is no indication for resubmission.

编辑从不给我送审 2023-03-28

Definitely possible. Rejection and resubmission is equivalent to major revision. Major revision is equivalent to minor revision. Minor revision is equivalent to acceptance.

SJDT 2023-03-17

Obviously, JSTARS is good. The peer review process of IEEE JSTARS is very standardized and rigorous, with professional experts and peers in the industry being invited to review the papers. The reviewers in the IEEE review database are also more professional. RS, on the other hand, has their own non-academic editors who review papers based on keywords, sometimes sending them to reviewers who are not relevant to the topic, resulting in a wide variation in the quality of the papers.

redefinemean 2023-03-16

Which one is better, this one or RS?

章波 2023-02-27

I have also submitted for 3 months, and still have not received any news.

爱吃炸酱面的晗 2023-02-18

Three reviewers, one minor revision, one major revision, and one who provided many suggestions for modifying the algorithm before resubmitting the paper. The editor gave a rejection, which is shown online. I wonder if it is possible to resubmit after making the modifications? I hope everyone can provide some guidance. Thank you all!