水文新鸟 2023-04-20

Reply to Litchi Channel: To be honest, if the pursuit is for speed and partition, JOH does indeed have a higher cost-effectiveness than HESS. However, in terms of long-term goals and industry recognition, HESS is the preferred choice. Although HESS has been unfairly placed in the second zone, overall, it is expected to rise and will eventually return.

荔枝台 2023-04-19

Understood, HESS is not good, I will go vote for JOH / dog head.

萝卜丝2021 2023-04-08

According to my senior brother, there is an existence in the European hydrological community that is on par with WRR.

荔枝台 2023-03-16

Compared to WRR, how difficult is it?

水文新鸟 2023-03-08

Recently I carefully read several articles on HESS. The quality of these articles is not inferior to WRR. Chinese submissions are much fewer compared to JOH. I casually checked this journal and found that the article with the highest citation in SCI history, with 2.8 million citations, is right here. Instantly, my respect for this journal has multiplied. I hope to publish an article in this journal in the future!

Rengar 2023-01-26

Reply to post 15, JH has a large number of submissions domestically in China, which involves the interests of many influential teams in China. It's very normal.

鲸鱼yb 2022-12-20

From the first submission to receiving comments from the peer review, to being rejected and resubmitting, and then to the second submission, receiving the comments from the peer review, and accepting revisions, it took a year. The time depends on the quality of your article. Some are fast, while others can take one or two years.

萝卜丝2021 2022-10-27

The journal in the field of hydrology is second only to WRR, with a solid ranking in Zone 1 (top level). However, this upgraded version has inexplicably downgraded it to Zone 2, which is truly puzzling!

柯岩瞬力 2022-10-16

May I ask if you could provide me with your email address? I would like to consult about some questions regarding this journal. I am not very familiar with EGU journals as this is my first time submitting.

ningting2012 2021-06-10

Second HESS acceptance. The first paper took six months from submission to acceptance, while the second paper took seven months. The reviewers were all very professional, and their comments were very helpful in improving the paper. The editor was also very responsible and made significant improvements to the language after acceptance. I would like to express my gratitude for that. Personally, I believe that this journal is second only to WRR in the field of hydrology and water resources. It has a strong grasp of innovation, which is why I chose to give it a try. The experience I would like to share is that after the first round of open review, it is important to carefully respond to and modify each comment. It is not enough to simply say that the revisions will be made in the next version. This gives the editor a serious impression and increases the chances of a major revision instead of outright rejection. My next goal is to aim for WRR. Let's keep up the good work! Good luck, mom of two kids!