xiaodamo 2022-09-22

The magazine is very good, and the quality of the papers published in the same period is also very high. The reviewers are also very responsible and raised many good questions. The only problem is that the review process is too slow, taking more than three months. If it weren't for seeing the email, I would have forgotten that I had submitted an article here...

SleepAngela 2022-05-31

The submission process went relatively smoothly, with the first review taking 1.5 months. After making revisions, it was quickly accepted for publication.

ppap 2021-04-26

Last year's first trial lasted for 63 days, this year's second trial lasted for 40 days, and the third trial has already been 24 days. It's better not to invest in this kind of magazine.

飞翔的一把刀 2021-04-23

It has been 3 months since the second trial, and I am truly speechless.

烈火-纲 2021-03-31

It has been 125 days since the first trial, sigh!

NelsonHC 2021-03-11

May I ask if the withdrawal was successful? I sent several emails, but there was no reply.

白云山 2021-02-13

It doesn't matter if the water is good or not, as long as what you make yourself is good. Who knows, you might even win a Nobel prize.

白云山 2021-02-13

There is no need to be so utilitarian! It's actually quite good. The magazine has already taken notice, as seen from the details revised during the submission process.

宸豆豆 2021-02-04

I want to ask, did the magazine respond to you, OP? I also wrote a withdrawal letter yesterday, but there was no response.

twzhang 2021-01-21

This journal is still pretty good, and the editors are industry experts. However, as others have mentioned, the cost of the magazine layout is expensive. In 2019, the journal suddenly accepted more than double the number of articles, and there were too many submissions from Chinese authors. These are all warning signs for evaluation by the Chinese Academy of Sciences. If the journal does not improve its acceptance rate, it may be removed from SCI. However, objectively speaking, many articles in this journal are meaningful and not superficial, and the self-citation rate is also low. Therefore, it is reasonable to classify it as a top journal in the field of geriatric medicine. It's just that the two evaluation criteria are different.

cfs 2021-01-17

This partition is also ridiculous. You assigned the TOP, and the journal warning is also what you said.

飞翔的一把刀 2021-01-14

How is the moderator doing? Was the recall successful?

doctor.chen 2021-01-07

I have been writing a withdrawal request for several days, but I haven't received any response. I'm thinking about whether I should make a phone call.

Dr.Derek 2021-01-07

Already reviewed, but on the list, don't plan to continue investing, wrote 2 withdrawal letters, it has been a few days and there has been no response.