雪橇狗的咆哮 2023-05-27

Submitted on March 1st, received the review in mid-April, with one revision in between. The result was rejection but allowed for resubmission. The reviewer was very meticulous and professional in addressing the issues.
Resubmitted on May 7th, accepted on May 26th.
The editing process was fast and meticulous, and the reviewer was also professional.
Wishing the journal continued success!

HHH-ZJJ 2023-05-22

2023 Feb 13 submitted
2023 May 17 accepted

llhlnn 2023-03-14

After a review of nearly two months, the final rejection resulted in submitting to Chemical Communications, which was accepted by Chemical Communications.

勤火燎原 2023-03-01

I declare that the following examples and the articles I have written are unrelated.

RayQWQ 2023-03-01

2023-02-03 Submission Initial assessment
2023-02-09 With editor
2023-02-20 In peer review
track of the manuscript Two reviewers, hoping for good luck!

勤火燎原 2023-02-15

20221009 First submission
20221225 First review rejection, one accepted with minor revisions, one rejection, then the editor sought a third arbitration rejection, but with comments for revision. Apologies for the long processing time, the editor was very understanding.
20221229 Consulted the advisor's opinion, made modifications and resubmitted.
20230125 Second review with minor revision suggestions, three minor suggestions, one fully accepted.
20230126 Submitted after making modifications, anxiously awaiting the outcome. Made a small mistake but promptly noticed and sent an email to the editor to correct it.
20230214 Still no news on the morning of Valentine's Day, checked the accepted status after 10:50 pm.
The overall submission process took a relatively long time. The editor was very professional and good. Perhaps there was some delay during the reviewer stage, but the timing was still acceptable. Thank you to the reviewers and editors for their hard work and constructive criticism. It is a well-established journal with great influence. Wishing them continued success.

网志 2023-02-11

Biodegradable epoxy resin derived from natural sources was submitted for review. After 10 days, the editor rejected it, stating that it did not meet the criteria for sustainable development. What are the current standards for sustainable development?

Cloudsky 2023-02-03

Which editor are you?

Yanluo 2023-02-02

GC received at the end of the year of the Tiger and before the year of the Rabbit. Overall, the submission went smoothly. The preliminary review did take a long time; the third reviewer should be the arbitrator. The review process was a bit lengthy, and the editor apologized for this. Green Chem. now has higher requirements for the novelty and highlights of the articles, as well as the greenness of the processes. Green Chem. currently has a stable impact factor. Thanks to the editor for their hard work, and also thanks to the patience and professional insights of the three reviewers, which made the article more refined. I wish Green Chem. all the best and hope that the IF will reach 20 soon.

Yanluo 2023-02-02

Some recorded submission timeline for reference, wish everyone a smooth submission.
【2022】10-15, Checking submission and files;
【2022】10-17, Initial assessment and generating reviewer instructions;
【2022】10-26, With editor;
【2022】10-29, In peer review;
【2022】11-03, With editor, then in peer review;
【2022】11-12, With editor;
【2022】11-15, In peer review;
【2022】11-25, With editor;
【2022】12-01, In peer review;
【2022】12-15, Major revision;
【2023】01-11, Revision submitted, then checking submission and files (around 2 hours), and with editor;
【2023】01-13, In peer review;
【2023】01-17, ACCEPTED.
Wish everyone a smooth submission and a successful year of the Rabbit.

摸鱼王 2023-01-26

The initial review took nearly 2 weeks.

摸鱼王 2023-01-26

From submission to acceptance, it took a total of two months. There were two reviewers, both of whom provided major revisions recommended by the editor. After the initial review, the process was relatively fast.

wzzz 2023-01-20

Very efficient journal. I submitted a paper on carbon capture-related work, and the reviewers were very professional. They raised fundamental questions in the field of chemistry, suggesting major revisions and even a rejection. However, the editor gave me the option to resubmit after rejection, with a six-month revision period. After a significant amount of careful revision and response, I resubmitted the paper and it was directly accepted by the original reviewer. The specific timeline is as follows:

September 5, 2022: Submitted
September 12: Under peer review
October 24: Rejected and asked to resubmit
December 25: Resubmitted
January 5: Under editor's review
January 6: Under peer review
January 16: Accepted

AlenFang 2023-01-19

2022.11.23 submit to journal
2022.11.23 initial assessment
2022.12.01 with editor
2022.12.03 in peer review
2022.12.19 major
2023.01.06 revision submitted
2023.01.19 accept
The second academic paper of my career, and also the first one during my doctoral studies, was accepted before the end of the Year of the Rabbit, which is the best New Year's gift!!!I also wish everyone good health and successful research in the new year!!!

Mr. Tian 2023-01-14

Enjoying the happiness, accept.

Mr. Tian 2023-01-13

I hope the editor can give me an opportunity.

AlenFang 2023-01-06

2023.01.06 revision submitted. The COVID-19 pandemic delayed it for a week, and after 18 days of going through the process, the revised manuscript has been submitted. Hopefully, it will be accepted before the lucky new year.

小田 2023-01-05

I hope the editor gives me an opportunity.

小田 2023-01-05

Hydrogen bond recombination has been invested.

llhlnn 2023-01-04

Big brother, has your article been accepted? The review process for this journal is so long now.

llhlnn 2023-01-04

Hello, I would like to read some of the great articles you have written. Could you please provide a title or DOI?

llhlnn 2023-01-04

2022.11.25 Submission
Followed by two weeks of peer review.
During this period, there were repeated exchanges in both "With Editor" and "Peer Review" stages.
From 2022.12.25 until now, it has been in the "With Editor" status.

嗯哼 2023-01-03

Excuse me, has the article on superhydrophobic coating for water systems been published? Can you please share the relevant information with me so that I can have a look?

AlenFang 2022-12-20

December 19, 2022. Major, both reviewers' opinions are relatively positive, but some experiments need to be supplemented. The editor did not specify the exact date for the revised submission (Are there any friends who have experienced the same situation? Please inform me), only saying "as soon as possible." (This can be considered a little comfort during the COVID-19 pandemic.)

AlenFang 2022-12-10

Based on everyone's comments, the initial assessment probably takes about 10-20 days to complete with the editor.

cc 2022-12-09

I submitted it on the 1st, and until now it is still in the initial assessment stage. I also don't know when it will be sent to the editor.

AlenFang 2022-12-03

2022.12.03 In peer review, judging by everyone's feedback, the review process should be quite fast.

AlenFang 2022-12-01

2022.12.01 with editor, hopefully the editor can give me an opportunity~

AlenFang 2022-11-29

How long has your manuscript initial assessment been?

摸鱼王 2022-11-29

The initial review is too slow! It delays matters.