Verified Reviews - GEOLOGY
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

Allen_Geo 2023-07-22

May I ask how many "in review" posts the original poster is displaying now?

Allen_Geo 2023-07-22

How many "in review" are currently displayed?

mzw 2023-07-08

Thank you for your email, and sorry for any confusion with the status chart. The system adds a new "In Review (can take 1-4 months)" line every time a reviewer accepts the invitation to review the paper.
It means that the paper has been submitted for peer review.

Allen_Geo 2023-07-01

May I ask if you now know what this status represents?

野外出到昏厥 2023-05-09

It has been over a month since I submitted, and as of now, it has returned to the status "In Review (can take 1-4 months)". I emailed the staff and they said they have not found enough reviewers yet and are still contacting them.

mzw 2023-04-30

One day later, it changed back to "in review". What does this mean?

林宇艾 2022-12-15

After being handed over to the editor, whether or not it is sent for review, it will always be in the "in review" status.

heartbeater 2022-12-11

What is the status of "in review"? Has it been followed up on?

heartbeater 2022-12-11

Same question, what is the status of review1-4 months? Has this level been passed through editing?

hbklt 2022-11-18

Hello, I would like to ask the original poster about the review process for geology. I submitted my work some time ago, and yesterday it was assigned to an editor. The current status is "In Review" (can take 1-4 months). I'm a bit confused, is it currently in the hands of the editor, or does it really take 1-4 months for processing?

乌拉拉哇嗷 2022-11-10

Three reviewers raised many questions from different perspectives. After the first review rejection, it was resubmitted with significant revisions. After the major revisions were made, the resubmission was given three weeks for minor edits. It was then accepted directly by the editor-in-chief. It was not easy.

林宇艾 2022-08-25

It requires special creativity and the ability to express oneself in concise language. The review results can either be minor revisions accepted, rejection with the option to resubmit, or outright rejection. In recent years, it has faced competition from other high-impact-factor publications, resulting in a slight decline in its status.

ninh 2021-12-20

Because of being in a hurry, there are some problems in the writing, but the editor-in-chief still suggests resubmitting. I didn't insist anymore, which is a bit of a pity.

发文章啊先人 2021-03-28

The text translates to: "After being appointed as the editor-in-chief of a certain journal, it was discovered that this person had conflicts with Geology and their submission was directly rejected!"

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now