scottlee 2023-08-08

I want to ask my comrades, for the dietary fiber that I am working on, do you think it is necessary to have structural data on the daily dietary fiber in this magazine?

王大可 2023-07-26

FH
6.22 submit
6.23 Left and right with editor
6.26 under review
6.27 underview
6.30 under review
7.19 RRC
7.20 under review
7.25 decision in process
This most likely means it's over.

苏小胖 2023-07-24

May 13, 2023 with editor
May 16, 2023 under review
Jun 23, 2023 Major revision
Jul 07, 2023 Submit
Jul 24, 2023 Accept

The editor has been very proactive in handling the manuscript feedback, and the reviewers are professional enough. The journal values my work and provided me with six reviewers. Fortunately, they were all kind enough to give me a chance to make revisions. I am grateful to the reviewers.

梅子2号 2023-06-30

What happened afterwards? I have also been reviewing for over a month.

Fl0 2023-06-05

5.4 Submitted
5.5 With editor
Review invitations accepted: 1
5.8 Review invitations accepted: 2
5.27 Reviews completed: 1
What's going on with the other reviewer? It's been almost a month already. Does this journal not have a deadline for reviews? Before submitting, I saw some comments saying some were slow and some were fast, but it seems like I ended up encountering the slow ones.

端小森-茂 2023-05-17

How long after receiving it Wos

端小森-茂 2023-05-17

How long does it usually take to receive?

遇见飞 2023-05-11

It's probably because you haven't submitted disgusting biomaterials before. After two months of direct communication with the editor, the template was rejected. It took such a long time and it wasn't even sent for review.

sleep zzz 2023-05-04

Mar 02, 2023 submission
Mar 05, 2023 under review
Mar 19, 2023 major revision
Apr 20, 2023 minor revision
May 1, 2023 accepted

Doctor12th 2023-04-12

I also directly converted to DIP. How is your paper?

No Cap 2023-04-09

I also changed the date, but the status remains with the editor.

kkkk2 2023-03-29

The second submission of food glue
3.4 Submitted to journal
3.7 Under review
3.20 Required reviews completed
3.23 Under review
3.28 Required reviews completed

kkkk2 2023-03-12

Hello, may I ask where can these information be viewed?

小巷 2023-02-26

The word "accepted" is already in English and does not require translation.

小巷 2023-02-24

0219 Revised
0221 with editor
0222 under review

Beyond Everything 2023-02-23

Feb 1, 2023 summit to journal - This refers to the submission of an article or research paper to a journal for consideration and potential publication, which occurred on February 1, 2023.

Feb 1, 2023 with editor - This indicates that there was a meeting or communication between the author(s) and the editor of the journal on February 1, 2023. It could involve discussing revisions, clarifications, or other aspects related to the submitted work.

Feb 3, 2023 with editor - This suggests another meeting or communication with the editor on February 3, 2023. It could involve further discussions or revisions related to the submitted work.

Feb 13, 2023 under review - This means that the submitted work is currently being reviewed by the journal's editorial board and/or peer reviewers. The review process typically involves evaluating the quality, validity, and relevance of the research before a decision is made on whether to accept, reject, or request revisions for the publication.

小巷 2023-02-19

October 12th: Submitted
October 17th: Under review
October 28th: Review invitations sent: 2+
October 29th: Review invitations accepted: 1
November 10th: Date changed
November 14th: Review invitations accepted: 2
November 17th: Reviews completed: 1
January 5th: Major revision, Review complete, Reviews completed: 2, Review invitations accepted: 2+
January 21st: Revised, Under review, Review invitations sent: 2
January 23rd: Review invitations accepted: 1
February 2nd: Reviews completed: 1
February 4th: Review invitations accepted: 2
February 15th: Reviews completed: 2, Required Reviews Complete
February 17th: Minor revise, Review complete

snoopy123 2023-02-01

Does it mean that once the first trial of DIP is over, it will be a tragedy rhythm?

dulian21 2022-12-22

How should I send a reminder to the editor via email?

曦望之光 2022-12-20

Mine has also been about four or five months. Many of the ones behind can already be found. May I ask how to contact?

今天看文献了吗？ 2022-12-05

It all depends on luck when it comes to these reviewers for submissions.

今天看文献了吗？ 2022-12-05

I also encountered this DIP, and it seems most likely to be a General issue. Usually, when it needs to be repaired, the feedback is to directly return it after RRC.

今天看文献了吗？ 2022-12-05

Already rejected after submission, returned with two reviewers' comments. One suggested major revisions, while the other believed that the lack of research on mechanisms led to the rejection, without any other constructive feedback. Planning to submit to FC now...

kkkk2 2022-12-01

Contact WOS for data correction, mentioning the overlooked errors. The corrections will be made in approximately two weeks.

大大大大哒 2022-10-15

In mid-July, the manuscript has been under review for three months and still hasn't been completed. They told me they couldn't find any reviewers. What can I do?

aeroblues 2022-10-06

Waited for three months, rejected...

aeroblues 2022-10-03

Is there a result now?

努力小柯基qq 2022-09-23

2022.08.06 submission
2022.09.14 minor revision
2022.09.19 return for correction
2022.09.22 accept

dulian21 2022-09-23

I have been under review since early July, and it has been two and a half months now.

aeroblues 2022-09-23

In this way, I submitted Food Hydrocolloids at the end of July, and then it was sent for review in early August and has remained in the "under review" status. I contacted customer service before, and they said that the editor invited four reviewers, but three of them declined. Only one reviewer's comments have been received.

Today, I asked customer service again, and they apologized for the long wait. They changed my status to "rrc" directly, and said that this can remind the editor to make a decision or continue to search for reviewers. Does this mean they are helping me urge the editor? Does this mean it's unlikely to be accepted?