Verified Reviews - Food Chemistry
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

CikH 2023-03-08

Summary
Submitted on November 1, 2022
Major revision on February 12, 2023
Returned on February 19, 2023
Required reviews completed on March 4, 2023
I'm not sure if I can accept it.

可乐可不乐 2023-03-07

3.7 under review.

勇敢牛牛 2023-03-06

I don't remember the specific submission time, but overall it was quite fast. It took about a month for the feedback to come back after submission. Currently, it has been accepted. Wishing everyone a smooth submission process.

可乐可不乐 2023-03-06

3.6 with editor

曹贵成ggw 2023-03-03

03.03 Rejection, lack of innovation, let's submit to Heliyon.

周末不想加班 2023-03-02

March 1st, rejection, scope is incorrect.

曹贵成ggw 2023-03-02

3.2 is still decision in process.

xsg179 2023-03-01

3.1 is still decision in process.

孙小依 2023-03-01

You are really ruthless, the efficiency is really low. This is the slowest area I have ever seen, speechless.

guoxin112 2023-02-28

With the editor for two months, with one change of date in between. Under review for a total of two days. Currently, all required reviews have been completed. Hoping for either major or minor revisions.

可乐可不乐 2023-02-28

1.8 Submit to journal (with editor)
2.28 With editor
...
There has been a tremendous change in attitude.

可乐可不乐 2023-02-28

I have been with editor for 2 months.

风筝有风~~~ 2023-02-28

2022.12.21 Submit to Journal - This means that on December 21, 2022, the document was submitted to a journal for review or publication.

2023.2.28 Under Review - This indicates that as of February 28, 2023, the document is currently being evaluated or reviewed by the journal.

孙小依 2023-02-28

I am submitting to this journal for the first time, and I have listed some easily overlooked requirements for your reference.
1. The number of references should not exceed 40. The total number of figures and tables should not exceed 6. The text should not exceed 7500 words.
2. Recommended reviewers should not be from the same country as the authors. Actually, the guide for authors states that no more than two reviewers from the same country as the authors should be recommended. We recommended two reviewers from China, but the editor-in-chief mentioned in the email for major revisions that reviewers from the same country should not be recommended, and they hope we can comply with this in the future.
3. In the email requesting revisions, the editor-in-chief mentioned that there should not be too many references from Chinese authors. Indeed, in my first submission, I did have a relatively high number of references from Chinese authors, accounting for more than one-third of the total references.
4. Speed: The process was initially very slow. In fact, we submitted once before November 21, 2022, and after more than 20 days in the "with editor" status, we were informed that it did not meet the requirements (the reference format was incorrect, and there were too many figures and tables). This time, after submitting, it took 38 days to enter the "under review" status. It also took 10 days to receive the results after the review was completed. The efficiency does not seem to be like that of a top-tier journal. However, the response was very quick after the major revisions were returned.

孙小依 2023-02-28

2022.11.21, submitted directly to the editor
2022.12.29, under review (yes, you read it right, it's been with the editor for over a month)
2023.01.16, under review
2023.01.21, under review
2023.02.01, required reviews completed (received an email notification this time)
2023.02.11, major revision and reconsideration (the reviewers and editor are satisfied with the experiment, raised concerns regarding the language and writing style, mentioned that the work is innovative but the novelty was not well expressed in the writing, given a two-week time frame for revisions and recommended Elsevier's language editing service)
2023.02.24, submitted revised manuscript directly to the editor in the morning
2023.02.25, received an acceptance email in the evening, seems like it was decided directly by the editor-in-chief without external review.

小丸子~ 2023-02-27

The English translation for the text "我选的yes" is "I chose yes."

敌不动我不动 2023-02-27

When proofreading, it is showing the message "your article is being processed as a regular issue. Please confirm if this is correct or if your article should be published in a special issue using the responses below. Yes or No." Should I select "Yes" or "No"? Please help.

周末不想加班 2023-02-27

Is it rejected or still in decision process?

周末不想加班 2023-02-27

February 27, the status is still Decision in Process.

chuan26 2023-02-22

Does it take this long to be submitted with the editor?

小丸子~ 2023-02-21

Submission process:
2022.11.3 submitted to journal
2022.11.7 with editor
2023.1.2 major revision and reconsideration
2023. 1.12 revised
2023. 1.13 under review
2023. 1.28 under review
2023. 2.5 under review
2023. 2.16 RRC (Revised Round of Consideration)
2023. 2.20 accept

李狗娃 2023-02-20

It has been almost two months since submission, but still with the editor...

半生人 2023-02-18

It has been four and a half months since submission. The editing process has been relatively fast, but the review process has been ongoing for over three months without completion. The status has changed six times from "under review". I wonder if no one wants to review my manuscript.

曹贵成ggw 2023-02-16

The status is still "decision in process" up to now.

Bonanza HH 2023-02-15

2022-8.17 submitted to journal

2022-8.29 with editor

2022-9.2 with editor

2022-9.5 under review

2022-10.23 under review

2022-11-6 under review

2022-11-14 under review

2022-11-18 required reviews completed

2022-11-24 major revision and reconsideration

2022-12-11 resubmit

2022-12-11 with editor

2022-12-15 under review

2023-1-28 accept

Translation:

2022-8.17 - Submitted to journal

2022-8.29 - Under review by editor

2022-9.2 - Under review by editor

2022-9.5 - Under review

2022-10.23 - Under review

2022-11.6 - Under review

2022-11.14 - Under review

2022-11.18 - Required reviews completed

2022-11.24 - Major revision and reconsideration

2022-12-11 - Resubmit

2022-12-11 - Under review by editor

2022-12-15 - Under review

2023-1-28 - Accepted

曹贵成ggw 2023-02-13

Similar to yours, mine is "02.02 decision in process" directly, and it is still in this state until now. May I ask if there has been any change in the status of your article?

wangcheng 2023-02-12

What happened to FC now, in the same condition?

guoxin112 2023-02-12

It has been nearly two months since submission, still with the editor~

unluckyJJ 2023-02-11

1.19 under review
1.28 under review
2.10 under review

These phrases indicate that certain items or documents are currently being examined or evaluated.

xsg179 2023-02-10

I don't know if the increase in the number of submissions is due to the graduation season.

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started