xq1996 2023-04-28

2023.4.27, edited by

Moira CL 2023-04-25

2023.04.24 submitted to journal

This text means that on April 24, 2023, something was submitted to a journal.

xq1996 2023-04-25

2023.4.7 submit to the journal - This means that a document or article is being submitted to a journal on April 7, 2023.
2023.4.24 with editor - This indicates that on April 24, 2023, the document or article is being reviewed or processed by an editor.

啾啾啾啾 2023-04-24

Without a review status, you can only see "under review". It is possible that the communication side can see the status and receive reminders.

LPZX 2023-04-24

"Why twice with editor? I also did it twice with editor."

LPZX 2023-04-24

I am also twice with the editor. Why twice? Very confused.

SAT 2023-04-22

06.04.2023 minor revision - On April 6, 2023, minor revisions were made.
18.04.2023 revision submitted - On April 18, 2023, the revision was submitted.
22.04.2023 Accepted - On April 22, 2023, it was accepted.

wyz 227425 2023-04-20

2023.4.8 Submitted to journal
2023.4.14 with editor

zms821 2023-04-19

Hello, may I ask when was your article submitted for review?

zms821 2023-04-19

Hello, may I ask when did you submit it for review?

chenwei30012 2023-04-19

Received 18 January 2023, Revised 31 March 2023, Accepted 12 April 2023, Available online 18 April 2023.

The submission was with the editor for two months, with a change in editor in between. After it was sent for review, the results came back in three weeks. There were three reviewers, one suggesting minor revisions and two suggesting major revisions. The editor requested major revisions and gave a two-week period for the modifications. After submitting the revised manuscript, it was accepted after 12 days. Although the process took a long time, it was ultimately accepted.

可乐可不乐 2023-04-19

Reviews completed: 1

So slow, the latest date changed is 4.3, no activity for half a month.

中不了太难了 2023-04-18

Returned for repair on the 4th, it has been two weeks and it is still under review, it's too slow.

xueya 2023-04-17

Hello, do you have the status of your peer review?

啾啾啾啾 2023-04-17

Still under review status, no updates yet.

bin 2023-04-17

The website shows that the editor has invited new reviewers. After the two reviewers completed their reviews, they did not enter the RRC stage, nor did they receive an email requesting an extension of the review time due to conflicting reviewer opinions. It is possible that the editor considered the two reviewers to be insufficient.

BUCHITAOZI 2023-04-17

3.31 submit to journal - This means that the submission should be made to the journal on March 31st.
4.17 submit to journal - This means that the submission should be made to the journal on April 17th.

bula 2023-04-16

3.30 submit to the journal - Submitted to the journal on March 30th
4.11 with editor - Currently being reviewed by the editor as of April 11th
4.13 with editor - Still under review by the editor as of April 13th
4.16 under review - Currently being evaluated by reviewers as of April 16th

bin 2023-04-15

The official website shows "under review" is still 2.18. The tracking link indicates that two reviewers have already completed the review, but there is no third reviewer assigned, and it has not entered the "required reviews completed" stage. It appears that the editor is waiting to see the review results, but it feels like the editor has given up on this manuscript. It has been five and a half months without a initial decision. Now, I have obtained several new sets of data. If it gets rejected, I will supplement the data and try submitting to a colloidal journal again.

东函 2023-04-14

I don't know what this reviewer is busy with, but they are really slow.

东函 2023-04-14

May I ask how many of your reviewers are currently accepting reviews and how many have completed the review process?

bless_lucky 2023-04-13

The review speed is super slow.
Submitted on October 10th, it was reviewed in less than two weeks. It was updated twice as "under review" in November, but the date stopped updating until March. I sent a reminder email in March, and the editor said they had received one review but was waiting for another. So the "under review" status was continuously updated (about four or five times). Finally, in late March, I received the review comments: accepted with minor revisions. I submitted the revised version on April 7th, and it was accepted on the 10th.
The characteristic of this journal is slow review process, but it is also not advisable to rush. It is recommended to wait for at least three months without any change in status before sending a reminder.

啾啾啾啾 2023-04-12

3.31 With Editor
4.2 Under review

Wishing you good luck!!!

科研新人 2023-04-11

It has been three months since submission, and it is still with the editor. It's too slow, so choose carefully~

bin 2023-04-10

Translation:

Track 4.10 Peer Review Status
Reviews Completed: 2
Review Invitations Accepted: 2
Review Invitations Sent: 2+

风筝有风~~~ 2023-04-09

Last December, I submitted it for review, and it is still under review now...

可乐可不乐 2023-04-08

Is this your first time submitting it for review? It's really outrageous. What's wrong with FC now?

半生人 2023-04-07

Not bad, the one I submitted in November last year is still under review.

东函 2023-04-07

The quality of the manuscript is just average, but the reviewers' invitations take a long time to be accepted. The editor sent out invitations to 2+ reviewers, and currently only 2 have agreed to review. No reviews have been completed yet.

可乐可不乐 2023-04-06

4.6 under review translates to "4.6 being reviewed" in English.