Verified Reviews - Food Chemistry
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

xiong08 2023-06-04

1.5 Submission
1.28 External review
6.4 Still in external review, there have been several changes in the review status along the way, I suspect they have found eight reviewers!
Completely different from the review speed when submitted in 2021, it's torturous.

catalysischina 2023-06-02

3.23 Submission
5.30 Acceptance
This is a summary, not an invited submission. There were 4 reviewers, one rejection, 3 revisions, and the editor requested major revisions. After the initial submission, there were 3 reviewers' comments, minor revisions mainly related to language.

坏男孩 2023-06-02

May I ask if the original poster has been waiting for a year and still hasn't received it? Haven't you followed up?

zaodidixun 2023-06-01

2022.5.7 Submitted
2023.6.1 Under review
It has been over a year and there is still no response, it is really too slow...

dulian21 2023-05-31

May 31, 2023 Still under review.

著名只吃不长前辈 2023-05-31

FC is simply too slow! Last year I submitted an article, waited for 2 months, then spent another month with the editor, only to be directly rejected. I quickly submitted it to Fond Research International, and it was promptly reviewed and accepted. The journal is good, but the submission process is really dragging. If the editors have such a heavy workload, why do they publish thousands of articles in a year and still not impact the impact factor...
I submitted it on May 25th, and it is still "Submitted to Journal" as of May 31st.

可乐可不乐 2023-05-29

5.21 under review
5.29 under review
Update: May 23, 2023. The revised draft has not received any feedback from the two reviewers. It seems like it will take another month. It's interesting how some papers in FC are reviewed and published within a month, while others take more than half a year.

念N 2023-05-26

There are two reviewers in total, with a total of 21 comments. The editor has given two weeks for revision.

zhu猪虾 2023-05-26

It has been a month for me too, I don't know what's going on.

dawnny 2023-05-26

20230406 submitted to journal
0422 sent back to author (issue with word count)
0424 resubmit
0425 with editor
0427 with editor (update)
It has been a month with the editor, can't they just reject or approve it already? Does anyone know what's going on?

dulian21 2023-05-25

September 12, 2022 - Submission
March 1, 2023 - Major revision
March 14, 2023 - Revised
May 12, 2023 - Minor revision
May 16, 2023 - Revised
May 20, 2023 - Under review
May I ask how long it usually takes for external experts to review a minor revision?

Berry_Fun 2023-05-25

2023.05.19 minor revision
2023.05.22 resubmit
2023.05.23 under review
Encountering a busy reviewer is also helpless.
The track service shows that in the previous round, two reviewers accepted the review invitation and provided their comments the next day, agreeing to accept.
Only one reviewer remained, waiting for more than a month after accepting the review invitation, and then provided a single comment... minor revision.
After submitting again this time, the editor sent it for review again, and I don't know how long I will have to wait.
This is the first time I have had such a submission experience, really testing my mentality.

半生人 2023-05-25

I invested in November of last year...

半生人 2023-05-25

It's already May 25th, the last time the date changed was May 9th under review. I have already adopted a "Buddha-like" attitude, as it has been six and a half months and the first review is still not completed.

可乐可不乐 2023-05-23

5.20 resubmit, with editor

wyz 227425 2023-05-23

5.22 Under Review

wyz 227425 2023-05-22

Has the feedback come back? So fast!

可乐可不乐 2023-05-18

Which official account is it, may I ask?

MINE-MY 2023-05-17

12.11 with editor
1.17 under review
2.15 review complete
Four reviewers, averaging one week to complete one
2.24 major revision
3.09 return for modification
3.18 under review
4.9 required reviews complete
4.11 minor review, only editor's comments
4.21 return for minor revision
5.1 accept
It took about five months, but during that time, there was a Christmas holiday equivalent to ten and a half days when foreigners did not work. Overall, there was not a long wait between steps. Basically, every week, the public account would inform you of the progress, how many reviewers were contacted, and how many were completed. It was quite convenient.

坏男孩 2023-05-17

Submitted on October 24, 2022, it has been almost 7 months today and I still haven't received the initial review results! The editor took three months to urge for revisions before submitting it for review, and it has been over three months since then. The date has changed several times, but there is still no outcome.

bin 2023-05-15

5.14 is under review.
5.14 has invited a new group of reviewers. It has been 6 months since the submission on December 2, 2022, and I still haven't received a decision. I'm starting to regret it.

xiaozx 2023-05-15

How is it so fast?

念N 2023-05-15

4.14 submitted to journal
4.21 with editor
5.02 with editor
5.03 under review
5.11 under review

Translation:

4.14 - Submitted to the journal
4.21 - Under the editor's consideration
5.02 - Still with the editor
5.03 - Under review
5.11 - Still under review

keem 2023-05-12

2.10 submitted to journal
2.27 with editor
3.2 with editor
3.3 under review
3.9 under review
3.15 under review
3.30 rrc, major revisions
4.26 resubmit, with editor
4.27 under review
5.8 under review
5.10 rrc
5.11 accept

Translated into English:

2.10 - Submitted to the journal
2.27 - With editor
3.2 - With editor
3.3 - Under review
3.9 - Under review
3.15 - Under review
3.30 - Revise and resubmit (rrc), major revisions required
4.26 - Resubmitted, with editor
4.27 - Under review
5.8 - Under review
5.10 - Revise and resubmit (rrc)
5.11 - Accepted

zhhhui 2023-05-11

Last year, I submitted once but it was rejected after two months without being reviewed.
Today, I tried again and the process was quick. Submitted on 4.1,
With the editor on 4.18,
Under review on 4.18,
On 4.19, both reviewers connected and received the manuscript for review.
On 5.2, the first reviewer's comments were submitted.
On 5.9, the second reviewer's comments were submitted.
Currently, it is still required to complete the reviews.
I feel that luck is still very important.

Moira CL 2023-05-10

2023.05.10 with editor

Berry_Fun 2023-05-09

2023.04.13 resubmit
2023.04.18 required revisions completed
It has been almost a month since the revised manuscript was submitted...
Continuing to wait...

dawnny 2023-05-08

20230406 submit to journal
0422 sent back to author (issue with word count)
0424 resubmit
0425 with editor
0427 with editor (update)
...

可乐可不乐 2023-05-06

5.1 major revision and reconsideration
There were four reviewers, and their comments were both loved and hated. The love was for their recognition, while the hate was because it seemed like some of the reviewers hadn't actually read the article. The editor provided a 21-day timeframe.

wyz 227425 2023-05-03

4.28 Under Review translates to "4.28 is currently being reviewed."

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now