Verified Reviews - EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MECHANICS A-SOLIDS
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

骑着狼放羊 2023-08-07

Extremely slow, there are reasons for the low impact factor.
Submitted on 2/13/2023.
Under review on 2/18/2023.
Required reviews complete on 3/11/2023.
Major revision given with a 2-month timeframe.
Sent to two reviewers for the first review.
Revised manuscript submitted on 5/4/2023.
Under review on 5/6/2023.
Date changed on 5/16/2023.
Date changed on 6/9/2023.
One reviewer completed on 6/15/2023.
Date changed on 6/25/2023.
Second reviewer accepted the review on 6/29/2023.
Second reviewer completed the review on 8/1/2023.
In the tracking system, four reviewers were invited. It seems that two of the first reviewers declined.
The editor from Tsinghua University has not processed it yet today.

Tongxiaomu 2023-05-19

How are you doing now?

ZZH 2023-04-18

It has been 21 days, still in the hands of editing.

ZZH 2023-04-11

I have been working on this submission for more than half a month, and it is still in the hands of the editor. Why is it taking so long?

jqd583 2022-06-07

Solid Mechanics authoritative journals. Now the efficiency is getting higher, receiving review comments in 20 days, two reviewers, their opinions are very professional, and they have high writing requirements. After submitting the revised manuscript, it will be accepted within a week.

元帅呀 2022-02-23

2021.10.15 Submission
2021.12.10 Two reviewers, major revisions in comments
2022.1.10 Revised
2022.2.23 Accepted

小兔子 2021-08-21

Pushed for 11 months, made a small repair, and the result is not bad.

小兔子 2021-08-09

It has been 11 months, and it is still under review. Why is it taking so long for me?

天马 2021-06-24

Posted on February 6, 2021,
Two major repair suggestions on March 12, 2021,
Returned for repair on April 12, 2021,
One minor repair suggestion on June 9, 2021,
Returned for repair on June 15, 2021,
Accepted on June 22, 2021.

L^_^ 2021-04-20

From submission to acceptance, a total of 9 months were taken, with the first review lasting 5 months, the second review lasting 3 months, and a major revision in between. The article was published online one month after acceptance.
There was one reviewer who provided very detailed comments, including 11 major comments, 11 figures in general, and 18 minor comments. Each of these comments needs to be carefully addressed.
2020.07.15 - Submitted to the journal
2020.12.19 - Major revision
2021.01.02 - Revision submitted to the journal
2021.01.05 - Under review
2021.04.10 - Accepted
2021.04.16 - Available online

小兔子 2021-04-14

It has been 7 months. Still under review.

小刘2021 2021-03-18

Submitted, outcome unknown.

XIAOQI 2021-03-03

Two months later, it was rejected and the two reviewers raised over 20 questions. The editor rejected it.

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now