Verified Reviews - ENVIRONMENTAL GEOCHEMISTRY AND HEALTH
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

LzLzzzzz 2023-08-04

You can send an email to the editor to inquire.

Access 2023-07-31

Why is it always in a waiting state after submitting the manuscript?

wellbetter 2023-07-30

I carefully looked at it myself, and the details are ready to be assigned to an editor.

wellbetter 2023-07-29

I am also under peer review on the same day of submission. Is it normal for it to show as "peer review"?

里克尔谋 2023-07-13

The issue of manuscript review speed is influenced by many factors. In academic papers, strength, luck, effort, and direction are all indispensable.

里克尔谋 2023-07-12

Personal experience, for sharing purposes only, wishing all colleagues success in their endeavors.

兽兽1 2023-07-10

Can I change the order of authors in this revised journal?

LzLzzzzz 2023-06-28

How did it suddenly become Q2? I remember it was still Q1 a while ago.

里克尔谋 2023-06-26

Indeed, the review system has been changed. We need to click on the link in the original system to access it. As for the speed, it depends on the direction. My junior sister, who reviews heavy metal-related topics, is very slow. As for me, I analyze toxicology, and I have already had to revise my work twice in a month.

兽兽1 2023-06-26

Thank you, I see the status is: Ready to be assigned to an editor.

LzLzzzzz 2023-06-26

You can click on "track all submission" to see the specific status, such as editor appointed or reviewers accepted.

LzLzzzzz 2023-06-26

I feel the same way, it has been two months since one reviewer accepted it.

兽兽1 2023-06-25

Has the submission system been changed? It feels completely different from the status provided by the seniors.

兽兽1 2023-06-25

What does "Submission under peer review on the same day" mean?

要努力科研呀 2023-06-23

May I ask what should be done if the editing cannot be saved? After clicking "save," it keeps spinning and after refreshing, the previous modifications are not displayed. I am using Microsoft's browser.

要努力科研呀 2023-05-08

May I ask how many days after you make the changes will you notify me of the acceptance?

SWJTU念 2023-01-05

投稿日期为10月14日,经过14天的小修修改后,于1月4日被接收,整个过程不到三个月。这是我第一次投稿SCI期刊,对于这个期刊我还是满意的。

人生1 2022-12-03

I'm sorry, but I don't have the ability to browse the internet or access specific web pages. However, I can help with translating the given text. The translation of the text from Chinese to English is: "The submission page for 'Submit revision' cannot be opened, or is the repair on that page? Thank you very much."

人生1 2022-12-03

Can't open the repair page? May I ask which repair page were you on at that time? Thank you.

钱小雅 2022-09-10

The journal is very good, and the reviewers' comments are also very good. The only problem is that the review process is slow. I submitted in January, went through two rounds of revisions, and got accepted in August. However, it has been a month since then, and I still haven't received the galley proof. I am very anxious. Can anyone please tell me how long it takes to receive the galley proof and how long until it is published online after acceptance in the journal "Environmental geochemistry and health"? (I'm afraid I won't be able to use it in time for applying for a scholarship.)

xianglechen 2022-08-27

Pretty good journal, but the speed is really slow. The deadline for revisions is two months, but I returned it in about 20 days. Below is a detailed timeline of my submission and its status for reference:

3.25: New submission
3.27: Editor assigned
4.2: Reviewers assigned
4.7: Reviewers assigned
4.22: Under review
6.21: Reviewers assigned
7.4: Reviewers assigned
7.4: Under review
7.7: Reviews completed
7.8: Editor assigned
7.28: Major revisions
8.15: Revision submitted
8.17: Editor assigned
8.18: Editor invited
8.19: Under review
8.22: Under review
8.25: Reviews completed
8.26: Editor assigned
8.27: Accept

ldt2222 2022-07-10

It is indeed too slow. The initial review took three months, and after sending a reminder letter, the editor only started processing it. There is only one reviewer (possibly unable to find other reviewers). The minor revisions had two suggestions, which were returned in ten days. Then, after a month, it was accepted.

sometime naive 2022-03-16

This journal is slow in terms of speed, but otherwise it is acceptable. Let me share the submission process in this journal. After submitting, it took half a month for the initial review, followed by a three-month first-round review. The editor provided minor revisions, and after resubmission, it took another two months before the paper was accepted directly.

葫芦娃 2021-12-23

The publication is pretty good, except it's a bit slow, everything else is great. I submitted it for over 3 months and it was accepted after a major revision. After all, it's quite good to have one published in a mainstream journal in the field of environmental risk assessment!

小白鼠的心路历程 2021-10-26

July 6, 2021 - Posted
July 8 - Under review
July 11 - Date changed
August 24 - Major review
September 3 - Revised, Editor assigned
September 4 - Under review
October 19 - Editor assigned
October 21 - Accept

seven11111 2021-08-19

Dear, what is the Research Square author dashboard? Will it have an impact on the later stages of the article?

Dr. Cao1994 2021-07-17

24 May 2021 Submitted
20 Jun 2021 Reviewers Assigned
As of 7.17, Reviewers Assigned
Does "Reviewers Assigned" in this journal mean "under review"?

Dr. Cao1994 2021-07-17

Congratulations on being hired. My current status is "Reviewers Assigned." Does this status mean "under review," or does it mean that the experts haven't accepted the review yet?

米修D 2021-05-07

From submission to acceptance, it went through two major revisions and one minor revision, with a change of reviewers in between, leading to the second major revision. The whole process took a total of 16 months. The specific review process is as follows:

09 Jan 2020: Submission Confirmation
10 Apr 2020: Major Revision
26 May 2020: Author Revision
24 Oct 2020: Notification to recommend 5 new reviewers. The editor informed that the 5 reviewers recommended during submission all accepted the invitation to review, but only one provided feedback on time.
16 Jan 2021: Major Revision
16 Feb 2021: Author Revision
11 Apr 2021: Minor Revision
12 Apr 2021: Author Revision
06 May 2021: Accept

zhang lei 2021-02-17

I won't mention the specific time point because it has been quite long. However, overall, I still recommend everyone to submit, mainly for the following reasons: 1. The impact factor (IF) of this journal has been on a rising trend, reaching 3.5 in 2019. It is predicted to surpass 4 in 2020/2021, making it a promising choice. 2. The duration from submission to acceptance took nearly a year, with the final acceptance on 07 Jan 2021. However, the opinions provided by the three reviewers were very professional and they will greatly enhance your article. In conclusion, apart from the slow speed, there are no other issues. Best wishes to everyone for a successful submission!

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More